Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of comprehensive land carrying capacity of urban–rural interlaced zone: a case study of Chenggong, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive land carrying capacity (CLCC) is an important criterion for regional coordinated development and optimization of land use spatial structure. With the continuous acceleration of China’s rapid urbanization process, how to scientifically evaluate the CLCC in the urban–rural interlaced zone has become an urgent need for quantitative research on the coordinated development of human-land relationship and effectively solves the conflict between urban and rural development. To this end, this paper takes Chenggong, a rapid development area in the urban–rural interlaced zone, as the research object and constructs a set of analytical methods for the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of the CLCC of the urban–rural interlaced zone. Firstly, 17 index factors are selected from the three dimensions of social carrying capacity, economic carrying capacity, and ecological carrying capacity to construct an evaluation index system, and the mean square deviation decision weighting method is used to determine the index weight. Secondly, use the comprehensive index method based on the mean square decision weighting to construct the CLCC evaluation model. Finally, integrate Markov model and Geographical Information System (GIS) spatial analysis method to carry out the analysis of CLCC’s spatiotemporal evolution characteristics. The results show that this method can reproduce the spatial and temporal evolution of CLCC spatial classification characteristics and spatial transition changes in the study area. The above results are reflected in the following aspects: (1) from the perspective of spatiotemporal evolution trends, Wujiaying’s CLCC evolutionary trend continued to rise. In addition, the evolutionary trend of CLCC in other regions has relatively large fluctuations. This result is more consistent with the actual situation. (2) From the perspective of spatial classification characteristics, the CLCC in the study area has a large spatial differentiation. Among them, areas below the medium carrying capacity are distributed in Luoyang, Qidian, and Dayu. However, areas with medium carrying capacity or above are distributed in Longcheng, Dounan, Wujiaying, and Majingpu. (3) From the perspective of spatial transfer changes, the CLCC levels in any two periods are in a state of transfer and change, especially the spatial transfer between low-capacity areas is more intense, which also shows that urban expansion has a greater impact on the changes in CLCC in the urban–rural interlaced zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abubakr P, B (2014) Monitoring and predicting land use change in Tripoli Metropolitan City using an integrated Markov chain and cellular automata models in GIS. Arabian J Geosci 7(10):4291–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BM (1991) Study on the productive capacity and population carrying capacity of land resources in China. China Ren-min University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssaphinou O, Vaggelatou E (2002) Compound Poisson approximation for multiple runs in a Markov Chain. Ann Inst Stat Math 54(2):411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui D, Chen X, Zeng WH (2018) Medium and long-term early warning research on water environmental carrying capacity: a case study of Kunming. Chin J Envir Sci 38(3):1174–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui G, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Cao Y, Liu X (2019) Comprehensive land carrying capacities of the cities in the Shandong Peninsula Blue Economic Zone and their spatio-temporal variations. Sustainability 11(2):439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Sarkar R (2019) Predicting the land use and land cover change using Markov model: a catchment level analysis of the Bhagirathi-Hugli River. Spat Inf Res 27(4):439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi M, Nejadsoleymani H, Mansouri R (2019) Land suitability map and ecological carrying capacity for the recognition of touristic zones in the Kalat region, Iran: a multi-criteria analysis based on AHP and GIS. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 3(6):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZM, Li P (2018) The origin and development of the concept of carrying capacity: a discussion based on the perspective of resources and environment. J Nat Resour 33(9):1475–1489

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZM, Yang YZ, Yan HM (2017) Research on the carrying capacity of resources and environment in the past 100 years: from theory to practice. Resour Sci 39(3):379–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan DJ, Zhao Z, Tan J (2019) Dynamic simulation of land use change based on logistic-CA-Markov and WLC-CA-Markov models: a case study in three gorges reservoir area of Chongqing. China Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(20):20669–20688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W (2017) Evaluation of comprehensive land carrying capacity in the Golden Triangle of the Yellow River in Shanxi, Shaanxi and Henan. Jiangsu Sci Techn Infor 2017(15):71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo HW, Sun XY, Lian LS (2016) Response of water yield function of the ecosystem to land use change in Nansi Lake Basin based on CLUE-S model and Invest model. Chin J Appli Ecolo 27(9):2899

    Google Scholar 

  • He G, Xia YL, Zhu YN (2018) Evaluation and prediction of land carrying capacity in Anhui province based on DPSIR-TOPSIS model. Bull Soil Water Conserv 223(2):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins GM, Kassam AH, Naiken L (1982) Potential population supporting capacities of lands in the developing world. Roma, Italia: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  • Jingping Xu, Fang L I, Anning Suo, et al (2019) Spatiotemporal change and carrying capacity evaluation of human coastal utilization in Liaodong Bay, China from 1993 to 2015. Chin Geogr Sci 29(3):463–473

  • Karimi H, Jafarnezhad J, Khaledi J (2018) Monitoring and prediction of land use/land cover changes using CA-Markov model: a case study of Ravansar County in Iran. Arab J Geosci 11:592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li MJ, Cheng GH, Chen YT (2004) Study on target standardization method of comprehensive evaluation. Chin J Manag Sci 12(special issue): 46–47

  • Liang W, Hui L (2019) Quantitative evaluation of Tibet’s resource and environmental carrying capacity. J Mount Sci 16(7):1702–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maria HS (2013) Mean square error optimal weighting for multitaper cepstrum estimation. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 19(80):158

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdi S, Seyed AJ, Saeed M, Sahar R (2019) A new model of ecological carrying capacity for developing ecotourism in the protected area of the North Karkheh. Iran J Indian Soc Remote Sens 47(169):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington R, Gifford R (1973) Energy and how we live. Committee for Man and Biosphere

  • Muthumanickam S, Arun C (2018) Performance analysis of 2 levels DWT-SVD based non blind and blind video watermarking using range conversion method. Microsyst Technol 24(12):4757–4765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ress WE (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. Popul Environ 17(3):195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sébastien Roussel, Hélène Rey-Valette (2007) On coastal zone social carrying capacity. Conférence du Réseau ENCORA,1–12

  • Shuo D, Jiadong Y, Yanyan W (2019) Performance evaluation of urban comprehensive carrying capacity of Harbin, Heilongjiang province in China. Chin Geogr Sci 29(4):579–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street JM (1969) An evaluation of the concept of carrying capacity. Prof Geogr 21(2):104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Yuan Y (2021) Zhong Q (2021) Evaluation of land comprehensive carrying capacity and spatio-temporal analysis of the Harbin-Changchun urban agglomeration. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(2):521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng Y, Xia W (2015) Evaluation on urban land comprehensive carrying capacity in Xi’an city under the process of urbanization. Open Cybern Syst J 9(1):1985–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unesco, Fao (1986) Carrying capacity assessment with a pilot study of Kenya: a resource accounting methodology for sustainable development. Paris and Rome: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization

  • Uyan M, Dursun AE (2021) Determination and modeling of lignite reserve using geostatistical analysis and gis. Arab J Geosci 14(4):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Liu H (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of regional resources and environmental carrying capacity using a PS-DR-DP theoretical model. J Geog Sci 29(3):363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Wu CY, Zeng F (2016) Dynamic analysis and prediction of land resources carrying capacity in poverty-stricken mountainous areas. Res Soil Water Conserv 23(6):322–326

    Google Scholar 

  • William V (1949) Road to survival. Victor Gollanez, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaoyun M, Xuyan X, Xiangqun Y (2018) Adjoining batch Markov arrival processes of a Markov chain. Acta Math Appl Sinica 34(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie QL, Jiang JY (2009) Empirical analysis of the diversity of regional land resource carrying capacity—a case of Changzhutan urban agglomeration. Syst Eng 04:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XL, Li X, Xiao CJ (2016) Regional land use layout optimization under different scenarios based on CLUE-S model. J Ecol 36(17):5401–5410

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesuph AY, Dagnew AB (2019) Land use/cover spatiotemporal dynamics, driving forces and implications at the Beshillo catchment of the Blue Nile Basin, North Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res 8(8):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan L, Wen SS, Yang K (2019a) Analysis of resources and environment carrying capacity and construction suitability in rapid urbanization region—taking the Chenggong. Kunming as Example Ecolo Sci 38(1):218–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan L, Yang K, Chen GP (2019b) Quantifying evaluation and grading of cultivated land fertility: a case study of Huaping. China Pol J Environ Stud 28(4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue DP, Dong QF (2010) Research on dynamic change of land comprehensive carrying capacity in Xi’an city. Resour Devel Market 26(6):513–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebire DA, Ayele T, Ayana M (2019) Characterizing soils and the enduring nature of land uses around the Lake Chamo Basin in South-West Ethiopia. J Ecology Environ 4(4):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Ye (2018) Multi scenario simulation analysis of environmental carrying capacity in western region based on fusion support vector machine regression prediction algorithm. Clust Comput 22(86):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XJ, Zhou QG (2017) Evaluation and prediction of land carrying capacity based on entropy weight TOPSIS and grey model—taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. Resour Devel Market 33(6):666–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Chen JW, Zhou P (2016) Assessment of land carrying capacity of island cities based on an improved ecological footprint model: a case study of Zhoushan City. Econo Geogr 36(6):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XY, Yuan GW, Jiaoxin M (2018) Assessment of environmental carrying capacity of marine resources in Lianyungang. Marine Environ Sci 37(4):537–544

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Kunming Water Affairs Bureau. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41761081) and the Science Research Foundation of Yunnan Education Bureau 2020 (No. 2020J0098).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, L. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of comprehensive land carrying capacity of urban–rural interlaced zone: a case study of Chenggong, China. Arab J Geosci 15, 591 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09784-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09784-y

Keywords

Navigation