Abstract
With the continuous development of social construction, China’s economy has a significant growth. But there is a problem of air pollution in mountainous areas. Statistics show that more than 70% of China’s cities exceed the air quality standard every year. Taking PM2.5 as the characteristic area of air pollution in a certain area, it is becoming the most urgent and important environmental problem in J urban agglomeration. At present, China has built a national ground monitoring network of air pollutants, but the existing monitoring stations are concentrated in urban areas. Suburban and rural areas without monitoring stations need to carry out air quality assessment, pollution prevention, and prediction, so these places have become “blind areas” for research. The factors that affect PM2.5 pollution are very complex, and the regional differences are also very obvious. It is difficult to determine the temporal and spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentration and the change mechanism only by using limited observation data at monitoring stations. The fuzzy multi-attribute of aerosol optical depth (AOD) products produced by satellite remote sensing provides an effective method to understand the distribution of air pollutants, pollutant diffusion, and pollution sources in a region. This paper also adopts the methods of field investigation, interview, and other investigation methods to investigate and analyze the ecological situation, the current situation of regional activities construction, and the existing problems of folk sports culture in China’s basin area. Based on fuzzy multi-attribute and mountain air PM2.5 detection, this paper applies it to the construction of folk sports activities, so as to promote the ecological environment development of Chinese folk culture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
22 November 2021
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09012-z
28 September 2021
An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08471-8
References
Abdelmadjid B, Omar S (2013) Assessment of groundwater pollution by nitrates using intrinsic vulnerability methods: a case study of the Nil valley groundwater (Jijel, North-East Ageria). Afri J Environ Sci Tech 7(10):949–960
Ahmed I, Nazzal Y, Zaidi F (2018) Groundwater pollution risk mapping using modified DRASTIC model in parts of Hail region of Saudi Arabia. Environ Eng Res 23(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.072
Almasri MN (2007) Nitrate contamination of groundwater: a conceptual management framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(3):220–242
Azubuike SE, Edet AE (2015) Vulnerability assessment of aquifers within the Oban Massif, South-Eastern Nigeria, using DRASTIC Method. Int J Sci Eng Res 6:1123–1135
Babiker IS, Mohamed MAA, Terao H, Kato K, Ohta K (2004) Assessment of groundwater contamination by nitrate leaching from intensive vegetable cultivation using geographical information system. Environ Int 29(8):1009–1017
Bazimenyera D, Zhnoghua T (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Hangzhou-Jiaxing-Huzhou Plain. China. Med Well Res J Appl Sci 8(3):550–559
Buczko U, Kuchenbuch RO, Lennartz B (2010) Assessment of the predictive quality of simple indicator approaches for nitrate leaching from agricultural fields. J Environ Manag 91:1305–1315
Chroeder JJ, Scholefield D, Cabral F, Hofman G (2004) The effect of nutrient losses from agriculture on ground and surface water quality: the position of science in developing indicators for regulation. Environ Sci Pol 7:15–23
Civita M, De Miao M (2004) Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: the Italian combined approach. Geofis Int 43:513–532
Corniello A, Ducci D, Monti GM (2004) Aquifer pollution vulnerability in the Sorrento peninsula, southern Italy, evaluated by SINTACS method. Geofis Int 43(4):575–581
Elisante E, Muzuka ANN (2016) Assessment of sources and transformation of nitrate in groundwater on the slopes of Mount Meru, Tanzania. Environ Earth Sci 75(3):1–15
Ezeh CC (2011) Geoelectrical studies for estimating aquifer hydraulic properties in Enugu state, Nigeria. Int J the Physical Sci 6(14):3319–3329
Fazelabdolabadi B, Golestan MH (2020) Towards Bayesian quantification of permeability in micro-scale porous structures—the database of micro networks. Hi-Tech Innova J 1(4):148–160. https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-04-02
Fırat EA, Ersoy H, Gültekin F (2006) Nitrate, nitrite and ammonia contamination in groundwater: a case study from Gümüşhacıköy Plain, Turkey. Asian J Wat Environ Pollut 4(1):107–118
Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S (2000) The PI method—a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 46(3):157–166
Houria B, Mahdi K, Zohra TF (2020) Hydrochemical characterisation of groundwater quality: Merdja Plain (Tebessa Town, Algeria). Civil Eng J 6(2):318–324. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091473
Hussain MR, Abed BS (2019) Simulation and assessment of groundwater for domestic and irrigation uses. Civil Eng J 5(9):1877–1892
Hussain MH, Singhal DC, Joshi H, Kumar S (2006) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in a tropical alluvial interfluve, India. Bhu-Jal News J 21:31–43
Jarray H, Zammouri M, Ouessar M, Hamzaoui-Azaza F, Barbieri M, Zerrim A, Soler A, Yahyaoui H (2017) Groundwater vulnerability based on GIS approach: case study of Zeuss-Koutine aquifer, South-Eastern Tunisia. Geofis Int 56-2:157–172
Kansoh R, Abd-El-Mooty M, Abd-El-Baky R (2020) Computing the water budget components for lakes by using meteorological data. Civil Eng J 6(7):1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091545
Khemiri S, Khnissi A, Alaya MB, Saidi S, Zargouni F (2013) Using GIS for the comparison of intrinsic parametric methods assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in scenarios of semi-arid climate. The Case of Foussana Groundwater in the Central of Tunisia. J Wat Resour Prot 5:835–845. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.58084
Kuisi MA, El-Naqa A, Hammouri N (2006) Vulnerability mapping of shallow groundwater aquifer using SINTACS model in the Jordan Valley area, Jordan. Environ Geol 50:645–650
Panagopoulos G, Antonakos A, Lambrakis N (2005) Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 14:894–911
Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28:32–53
Sener E, Sener S, Davraz A (2009) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability based on GIS and DRASTIC methods: a case study of the Senirkent-Uluborlu Basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 17:2023–2035
Shrestha S, Semkuyu DJ, Pandey VP (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability and risk to pollution in Kathmandu Valley. (Nepal). Sci Total Environ 556:23–35
Twarakavi NKC, Kaluarachchi JJ (2006) Sustainability of ground water quality considering land use changes and public health risks. J Environ Manag 81:405–419
Uma KO (2003) Hydrogeology of the perched aquifer systems in the hilly terrains of Nsukka town, Enugu State, Nigeria. Wat Resour J 14:85–92
Van Stempvoort D, Evert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compactable method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour J 18:25–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Sheldon Williamson
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Environment and Low Carbon Transportation
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09012-z
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, G., Gan, L., Yang, H. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection of PM2.5 in mountain air based on fuzzy multi-attribute and construction of folk sports activities. Arab J Geosci 14, 1847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08210-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08210-z