Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geodesy ecological perspective of architectural tectonics in green building design

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the conflict between human activities and the natural environment has caused the deterioration of the natural environment and human settlements, forcing people to re-examine the relationship between man and nature and architecture and the natural environment. With the concept of sustainable development put forward, architects began to think about how to solve the impact of building on energy and environment from the root. The emergence of ecological building is based on this background, and traditional buildings ignore its ecological impact on the surrounding environment and internal micro environment, resulting in the fact that large numbers of existing green buildings are non-ecological. In view of this situation, this paper first from the ecological point of view expounds the dilemma of human survival due to the excessive destruction of the natural environment, takes architecture as the research scope, takes the ecological characteristics of green buildings as the starting point, and first analyses the impact of green buildings on the urban ecological environment from the perspective of urban design, combined with examples; the paper puts forward different ecological design strategies from the aspects of the preliminary design planning of green building, the design of each part of the building, the design of the internal environment of the building, and the ecological operation in the later stage of the building; sums up the ecological evaluation standards of green building; and finally prospects the development trend of ecological green building in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adele H, Carlos CS (2017) Health co-benefits of green building design strategies and community resilience to urban flooding: a systematic review of the evidence[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1519–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi XL (2018) Research on green building design based on life cycle [J]. J Taiyuan Univ 36(4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, You W (2018) Basic green building design: reconnecting sustainability to the vernacular[J]. Archit Des 88(6):80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju YW (2021) Analysis of the application of green building design concept in residential district design [J]. Sichuan Cement 17(5):109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2021) Analysis of the application of green concept in architectural design [J]. Low Carbon World 11(5):188–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Li PM, Ying W, Quan J et al (2015) Evaluation and selection research on external wall insulation materials based on green building energy conservation[J]. Mater Sci Forum 8(14):524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY (2018) Basic principles and specific application of green building design [J]. Shanxi Arch 44(36):25–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu LB (2021a) On the application of green building in urban planning and design [J]. Public Standard 18(9):84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu WN (2021b) Discussion on green building technology optimization in architectural design [J]. Indust Technol Forum 20(8):35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ls A, Hang YA et al (2017) An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design[J]. Build Environ 12(4):388–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu YY (2021) Application analysis of new environmental protection and energy saving technologies in water supply and drainage design and construction of modern green buildings [J]. Anhui Arch 28(05):68–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Neda Z (2015) bakhsh, Maryam, et al. Passive solar concept in green building design[J]. J Nature Sci Sustain Technol 9(3):551–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi SB (2018) Application of green building design in high-rise civil building design [J]. Intelligent City 4(21):26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian CA (2018) Application of green building design in high rise civil building design [J]. Arch Technol Dev 45(24):17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge MJ, Worden K, Pyke C (2016) Using green building as a model for making health promotion standard in the built environment[J]. Health 35(11):2062–2067

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Liu Y, Ren J et al (2017) A brief comparison of existing regional green building design standards in China[J]. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Once 59(1):012–013

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie K, Li XJ (2018) Research on regional green building [J]. Shanxi Arch 44(31):8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (2018) Embodiment of green building design concept in residential building design -taking Nanjing project design as an example [J]. Urban Hous 25(12):92–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XG (2021) Application of water saving and wastewater reuse technology in green building design [J]. Sci Econ Guide 29(13):140–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Zou P, Wang J (2016) Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects[J]. Int J Proj Manag 34(1):66–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi K, Chao TW (2015) Game-based learning for green building education[J]. Sustainability 7(5):5592–5592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QF (2018a) Analysis on the application of green building design concept in modern architectural design [J]. Shanxi Arch 44(29):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M (2018b) The relationship between green building design and green energy-saving building [J]. Sci Technol Innov Guide 15(32):98–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T (2021) Current situation, development and application of green building technology [J]. Sichuan Build Mater 47(5):30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang J, Hu F, Wang Y (2017) Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68(1):262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wang Yuzhuo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Santanu Banerjee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuzhuo, W., Yuanyuan, Y. Geodesy ecological perspective of architectural tectonics in green building design. Arab J Geosci 14, 1685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08142-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08142-8

Keywords

Navigation