Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Utilising Twitter for disaster management of fire events: steps towards efficient automation

  • 2nd CAJG 2019
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article introduces a novel method for processing and visualising information linked to fire events, from Twitter, which is utilised as a source of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). The fire of North East Attica (August 2017, Greece) was used as a case study. That fire resulted in the burn of 15,000 decares of woodland, while state of emergency was declared in the region and thousands of citizens were incited to leave from the area. A tweet corpus consisted of 74,292 tweets was processed, containing certain words and hashtags linked to the fire event and posted within a week since the fire occurrence. After about 24,000 classified and geo-referenced point observations were extracted, data processing was performed with the use of machine learning and of an innovative script, developed in R, for geo-referencing social media data, related to disaster management. The classification structure applied consisted of four main categories: (I) tweets related to simple fire event detection, (II) tweets related to crisis management, (III) tweets related to consequences of the fire and (IV) tweets related to the tracking of the fire event.; further sub-classifications were performed to quantify the consequences of the fire, and to indicate the precision of the geo-referenced contents. The final output consisted of scatter plots that analyse the frequency of the extracted content, along with maps that visualised the processed information. Both graphs and maps utilised certain subsets of the data, posted through Twitter in certain time periods. Author visualization approaches considered the need for having maps that can make sense to all disaster management (DM) stakeholders: from decision makers up to simple citizens and volunteers that want to protect human lives and property. The results of the current research provide steps towards efficient automation and give an initial credible overview to the readers about the generated graphs and maps, at a glance. Finally, the author’s methodological framework, at the current stage, drastically reduces the time needed for data processing to less than 2 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedin B, Babar A (2018) Institutional vs. non-institutional use of social media during emergency response: a case of twitter in 2014 Australian bush fire. Information Systems Front 20(4):729–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sharawneh J, Sinnapan S, Williams MA (2013) Credibility-based Twitter social network analysis. Web technologies and applications. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 7808:232–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Andronico L, Marincioni F (2018) Natural hazards and disaster risk reduction policies. Geographies Anthropocene 1(2):11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Arapostathis SG (2018) Automated methods for effective geo – referencing of tweets related to disaster management, International Geomatics Applications Conference – Book of abstracts (online), ISSN: 2653-9098, page 62.

  • Arapostathis SG (2019) Instagrammers report about the deadly wildfires of East Attica, 2018, Greece: an introductory analytic assessment for disaster management purposes. In: Franco Z, González JJ, Canós JH (eds) Proceedings of the 16th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management. Iscram, Valencia, Spain, pp 473–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Arapostathis SG, Karantzia M (2019) Mapping information of fire events, from VGI source (Twitter), for effective disaster management (in Greece); the fire of North-East Attica, August 2017, (Greece) case study. In: El-Askary H., Lee S., Heggy E., Pradhan B. (eds) Advances in remote sensing and geo informatics applications. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development). Springer, Cham pp 257-260

  • Arapostathis SG, Spyrou N, Drakatos G, Kalabokidis K, Lekkas E, Xanthopoulos G (2018). Mapping information related to floods, extracted from VGI sources, for effective disaster management within the Greek territory; the floods of West Attica (November 2017 Greece) case study. In 11th International Conference of the Hellenic Geographical Society.

  • Ashktorab Z, Brown C, Nandi M, Culotta A (2014). Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response. In ISCRAM.

  • Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). # Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124-147.

  • Cruz-Bello GM, Alfie-Cohen M, Morales-Zaragoza NA, Larralde-Corona AH, Reyes Perez J (2018) Flood vulnerability reduction, using a partial participatory GIS approach. A study case in Baja California Sur, Mexico., Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3/W4, 185-190

  • Daly S, Thom JA (2016) Mining and classifying image posts on social media to analyse fires. In ISCRAM.

  • Dashti S, Palen L, Heris MP, Anderson KM, Anderson TJ, Anderson S (2014) Supporting disaster reconnaissance with social media data: a design-oriented case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. In: ISCRAM

    Google Scholar 

  • De Albuquerque JP, Herfort B, Brenning A, Zipf A (2015) A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management. Int J Geographical Information Sci 29(4):667–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brito M, Evers M, Almoradie ADS (2018) Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: a multi-criteria approach. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

  • De Bruijin JA, de Moel H, Jongman B, Wagemaker J, Aerts JC (2018) TAGGS: grouping tweets to improve global geoparsing for disaster response. J Geovisualization Spatial Analysis 2(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Longueville B, Smith RS, Luraschi G (2009) Omg, from here, i can see the flames!: a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on location based social networks, pp 73–80 ACM

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Earle P, Guy M, Buckmaster R, Ostrum C, Horvath S, Vaughan A (2010) OMG earthquake! Can Twitter improve earthquake response? Seismol Res Lett 81(2):246–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field K, O’Brien J (2010) Cartoblography: experiments in using and organising the spatial context of micro-blogging. Transactions GIS 14:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakeris P, Avgerinakis K, Karakostas A, Vrochidis S, Kompatsiaris I (2018) People and vehicles in danger-a fire and flood detection system in social media. In: 2018 IEEE 13th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP), pp 1–5 IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Girres JF, Touya G (2010) Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Transactions GIS 14(4):435–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg N, Joseph K, Friedland L, Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D (2019) Fake news on twitter during the 2016 US Presidential election. Science 363(6425):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunder-Fahrer S, Schlaf A, Wustmann S (2018) How social media text analysis can inform disaster management GSCL 2017. LNAI 10713:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M, Basiouka S, Antoniou V, Ather A (2010) How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. Cartographic J 47(4):315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herfort B, de Albuquerque JP, Schelhorn SJ, Zipf A (2014) Exploring the geographical relations between social media and flood phenomena to improve situational awareness. In: Connecting a digital Europe through location and place. Springer, Cham, pp 55–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huiji G, Barbier G (2011) Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE 480 Intelligent Systems 26(3):1541–1672

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacus SM, Porro G, Salini S, Siletti E (2017) How to exploit big data from social networks: a subjective well-being indicator via twitter. Proc E Report 114:537–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran M, Castillo C, Lucas J, Meier P, Vieweg S (2014) AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp 159–162 ACM

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Imran M, Elbassuoni S, Castillo C, Diaz F, Meier P (2013) Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. In Iscram.

  • Jiang B, Thill JC (2015) Volunteered Geographic Information: towards the establishment of a new paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Barbier G, Abbasi MA, Liu H (2011) Tweettracker: An analysis tool for humanitarian and disaster relief. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.

  • Li Z, Wang C, Emrich CT, Guo D (2018) A novel approach to leveraging social media for rapid flood mapping: a case study of the 2015 South Carolina floods. Cartography Geographic Information Sci 45(2):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall K (2011) Understanding the impact of volunteered geographic information during the Queensland floods. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Digital Earth (ISDE 7) (pp. 66-74). Western Australian Land Information System.

  • Morstatter F, Pfeffer J, Liu H, Carley KM (2013) Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming app with Twitter’s firehose. In Seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.

  • Ngamassi L, Malik A, Zhang J, Edbert D (2017) Social media visual analytic toolkits for disaster management: a review of the literature. In ISCRAM.

  • Onorati T, Díaz P, Carrion B (2019) From social networks to emergency operation centers: a semantic visualization approach. Future Generation Comput Syst 95:829–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Barua U, Khatun F, Islam I, Rafiq R (2018) Participatory vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management. Nat Hazards 93:1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3364-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resch B, Usländer F, Havas C (2018) Combining machine-learning topic models and spatiotemporal analysis of social media data for disaster footprint and damage assessment. Cartography Geographic Information Sci 45(4):362–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2010) Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 851-860). ACM.

  • Scholz S, Knight P, Eckle M, Marx S, Zipf A (2018) Volunteered Geographic Information for disaster risk reduction—the missing maps approach and its potential within the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Remote Sens (Basel) 10(8):1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnappan S, Farrell C, Stewart E (2010) Priceless tweets! A study on Twitter messages posted during crisis: Black Saturday. ACIS 2010 Proceedings, 39.

  • Skopeliti A, Tzavella K (2018) Assessment of VGI in crises management: Record - Μapping - Evaluation.

  • Smith L, Liang Q, James P, Lin W (2017) Assessing the utility of social media as a data source for flood risk management using a real-time modelling framework. J Flood Risk Manag 10(3):370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA (2007) Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. arXiv preprint cs/0702140.

  • Yin J, Karimi S, Lampert A, Cameron M, Robinson B, Power R (2015) Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. In Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong X, Duckham M, Chong D, Tolhurst K (2016) Real-time estimation of wildfire perimeters from curated crowdsourcing. Sci Rep 6:24206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harokopio University, Kallithea, Greece

    Stathis G. Arapostathis

Authors
  1. Stathis G. Arapostathis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stathis G. Arapostathis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hesham El-Askary

This paper was selected from the 1st Conference (Tunisia November 2018, short paper published in 2019)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arapostathis, S.G. Utilising Twitter for disaster management of fire events: steps towards efficient automation. Arab J Geosci 14, 667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06768-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06768-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation