Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of geostress field on dynamic mechanical behavior of intact rock

  • GMGDA 2019
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high magnitude of in situ geostress under deep underground conditions and the intermediate principal stress under complex stress conditions have a significant influence on the static or dynamic mechanical behavior and strength characteristics of intact rock material. The constitutive relationship for quasi-brittle materials (e.g., intact rock or concrete) subjected to large strains, high strain rates, high pressures, and complex stress states was investigated, but the mechanical behavior and strength characteristics for rock under high pressures and complex stress states have not yet been elucidated. This study mainly focuses on constitutive modeling and theoretical prediction of the dynamic mechanical behavior and strength characteristics for rock under high dynamic pressures and complex stress states. A damaged elastoplastic constitutive model for intact rock is established in this study by taking the influence of a high strain rate, high pressure, and complex stress state into account. The failure mechanism of deeply buried rock engineering under high in situ stress and an additional impact pressure from a high-velocity underground impact was analyzed in this paper. The influence of the high pressure and intermediate principal stress on the quasi-static or dynamic mechanical behavior and strength characteristics of the deeply buried rock was investigated under a complex stress state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 6(4):189–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M (2008) Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries—Insight from numerical modeling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 45:763–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 41(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Wang CP, Liu JF, Liu J, Wang J, Jia Y, Shao JF (2015) Damage and plastic deformation modeling of Beishan Granite under compressive stress conditions. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 48(4):1623–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanchak SJ, Forrestal MJ, Young ER (1992) Perforation of concrete slabs with 48 MPa (7 ksi)and 140 MPa (20 ksi) unconfined compressive strengths. International Journal of Impact Engineering 12(1):I-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE 106:1013–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR (2011) Numerical algorithms and material models for high-velocity impact computations. International Journal of Impact Engineering 38(6):456–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR, Holmquist TJ (1992) A computational constitutive model for brittle materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures. In: Meyers, Murr and Staudhammer, editors. Proceedings of EXPLOMET Conference. San Diego: Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

  • Johnson GR, Holmquist TJ (1994) An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials. In: Schmidt SC, Shaner JW, Samara GA, Ross M (eds) High-Pressure Science and Technology. AIP Press, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachanov LM (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep condition. Tvz Akad, Nauk. SSR. Otd. Tech. Nauk. 8(1):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 124(8):892–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre J (1971) Evaluation of dissipation and damage in metals submitted to dynamic loading. Proceedings of ICM-1, Kyoto.

  • Li YL, Ma ZY (2017) A damaged constitutive model for rock under dynamic and high stress state. Shock and Vibration 2017(15715):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Ma GW, Yu MH (2008) Penetration analysis for geo-material based on unified strength criterion. International Journal of Impact Engineering 35(10):1154–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Lv SR, Zhang LM et al (2015) A dynamic damage constitutive model for a rock mass with persistent joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:132–139

  • Liu J, Liang X, Xue Y et al (2020) Numerical evaluation on multiphase flow and heat transfer during thermal stimulation enhanced shale gas recovery. Appl Therm Eng 178:115554

  • Ma ZY, Dang FN, Liao HJ (2014) Numerical study of the dynamic compaction of gravel soil ground using the discrete element method. Granular Matter 16(6):881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index: applications and limitations. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and Environment 64:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelis P (1985) Polyaxial yielding of granular rock. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 111(8):1049–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1971) Fracture and flow of rocks under high triaxial compression. Journal of Geophysical Research 76:1255–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1972) Fracture and flow of rocks. Tectonophysics 13(11):541–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou VK, Kappos AJ (2007) Confinement-sensitive plasticity constitutive model for concrete in triaxial compression. International Journal of Solids and Structures 44(2):7021–7048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtes L, Donze FV (2013) A DEM model for soft and hard rocks: role of grain interlocking on strength. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 61(2):352–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simulia DS (2014) Abaqus 6.14 Help Documentation. USA: Dassault Systems simulia Corp.

  • Singh M, Raj A, Singh B (2011) Modified Mohr-Coulomb criterion for non-linear triaxial and polyaxial strength of intact rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 48(4):546–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YX, Cao P, Huang YH et al (2012) Nonlinear damage and failure behavior of brittle rock subjected to impact loading. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13(1):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie LX, Lu WB, Zhang QB, Jiang QH, Wang GH, Zhao J (2016) Damage evolution mechanisms of rock in deep tunnels induced by cut blasting. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 58:257–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Teng T, Dang FN, Ma ZY et al (2020) Productivity analysis of fractured wells in reservoir of hydrogen and carbon based on dual-porosity medium model. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(39):20240–20249

  • Yu MH (2004) Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th century. Advances in Mechanics 34(4):529–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MH, Zan YW, Zhao J, Yoshimine M (2002) A unified strength criterion for rock material. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 39(8):975–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang QB, Zhao J (2014) A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 47(4):1411–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research described in this paper was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51979225, 51722907) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Project (No. 300102268202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, 5 South Jinhua Road, Xi’an, 710048, Shaanxi, People’s Republic of China

    Zongyuan Ma, Faning Dang & Yanlong Li

  2. College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Middle-section of Nan’er Huan Road, Xi’an, 710064, Shaanxi, China

    Yuxiang Cheng

Authors
  1. Zongyuan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faning Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanlong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuxiang Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongyuan Ma.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geological Modeling and Geospatial Data Analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Dang, F., Li, Y. et al. Influence of geostress field on dynamic mechanical behavior of intact rock. Arab J Geosci 14, 78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06313-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06313-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation