Skip to main content
Log in

Using the analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Isparta-Antalya highway (D-685), Turkey

  • ICCESEN 2017
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The D-685 highway, which connects Isparta to Antalya, has a dense traffic line with a length of 110 km. Landslide and debris flow are common on the road route. In some regions, rehabilitation works have been carried out by the highway commission. However, the clastic, unconsolidated, and high clay content of the lithological units in the road line causes the continuation of landslide and debris flows in different regions. Especially, heavy rain showers increase this effect. Landslide susceptibility maps based on geographical information systems (GIS) were developed to ensure safer driving on the highway and contribute to the planners. Parameters such as lithology, slope, distance from roads, distance from streams, land cover, precipitation, elevation, and aspect were used. Analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio methods were used to assess these parameters. The obtained susceptibility maps were divided into four classes as low, moderate, high, and very high. There are large areas with high and very high susceptibility in the maps produced by both methods. Some parts of the highway pass through these high and very high susceptibility areas. According to the susceptibility maps, high and very high susceptibility areas are more intense in northern and central areas within the study area. These regions are also the sections with the highest elevation. In the study area, elevation decreases from north to south, and flat areas increase toward the south. For the validation of the maps, 16 of the 81 landslide areas were used for testing purposes. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the obtained maps have a level of reliability of over 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is available.

References

  • Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Biermanns P, Haider R, Reicherter K (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China-Pakistan economic corridor (Karakoram highway), Pakistan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19:999–1022. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-999-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81:432–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GISbased weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt BP, Awasthi KD, Heyojoo BP, Silwal T, Kafle G (2013) Using geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process in landslide Hazard zonation. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences 1(2):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard and risk mapping. Proc., Fourth International Symposium on Landslides, Canadian Geotechnical Society, Toronto, Canada, 1: 307–324

  • Brabb EE, Harrod BL (1989) Landslides: extent and economic significance. A.A. Balkema Publisher, Rotterdam 385 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Tuner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides. Investigation and mitigation, Special report of the transportation research brand. Natural research council, National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp 36–75

  • Çan T, Duman TY, Olgun Ş, Çörekçioğlu Ş, Karakaya Gülmez F, Elmacı H, Hamzaçebi S, Emre Ö (2013). Türkiye Heyelan Veri Tabanı, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 11–13 November 2013, Ankara

  • Dai FC, Lee C (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213e228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 43(3):381–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Doe III WW, Harmon RS (2001) Introduction to Soil Erosion and Landscape Evolution Modeling. In: Harmon RS, Doe WW (eds) Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling. Boston, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0575-4_1

  • Dragicevic S, Lai T, Balram S (2015) GIS-based multicriteria evaluation with multiscale analysis to characterize urban landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments. Habitat International 45:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci D (2011) Zonguldak-Hisarönü Arasındaki Karadeniz Akaçlama Havzasının Kütle Hareketleri Duyarlılık Analizi. Titiz Yayıncılık, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RH (2002) The effects of logging on frequency and distribution of landslides in three watersheds on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Geomorphology 43:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi–scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günal M, Ay M, Günal AY (2017) Cross-drainage culvert design by using GIS. Special issue of the 3rd international conference on computational and experimental science and engineering (ICCESEN 2016). Acta Physıca Polonıca A 132(3)

  • Günal AY, Güven A (2015) Determination of geomorphological parameters of Damlıca Basin Using GIS. Special issue of the International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (ICCESEN 2014). Acta Physıca Polonıca A 128(2-B)

  • Günal AY, Güven A (2016) Synthetic unit hydrograph of small catchments by using GIS. Special issue of the 2nd international conference on computational and experimental science and engineering (ICCESEN 2015). Acta Physıca Polonıca A 130(1)

  • Harmouzil H, Nefeslioglu HA, Rouail M, Sezer EA, Dekayir A, Gokceoglu C (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Mediterranean coastal zone of Morocco between Oued Laou and El Jebha using artificial neural networks (ANN). Arab J Geosci 12:696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4892-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasekioğulları GD, Ercanoğlu M (2012) A new approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey). Nat Hazards 63:1157–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 56:275–370. https://corinecbstarimorman.gov.tr/corine. Accessed 15 March 2020. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/SiteCollectionDocuments/KGMdocuments/Trafik/trafikhacimharitasi/2018HacimHaritalari/Hacim2018Devlet.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2020

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2009) A fuzzy set based approach for integration of thematic maps for landslide susceptibility zonation. Georisk 3(1):30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2013) Evaluation of the consistency of landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from the Kankai watershed in East Nepal. Landslides 10:785–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74(1–4):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47:982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi S, Rezai M (2014) A GIS-based comparative study of the analytic hierarcy process, bivariate statistics and frequency ratio methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in part of the Tehran metropolis, Iran. Jgeope 4(1):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, 1/100000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları No:14 Isparta-M25 paftası, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi Ankara, 2010a

  • MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, 1/100000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları No:11 Isparta-N25 paftası, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi Ankara, 2010b

  • MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, 1/100000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları No:18 Antalya-O25 paftası, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi Ankara, 2010c

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikalovic A, Cosic I, Lazarevic D (2014) GIS based multi-criteria analysis for industrial site selection. Procedia Engineering 69:1054–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic Hiearchy process. McGrawHill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23(2):357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Ahmad B, Khezri S (2012) Evaluation and comparison of bivariate and multivariate statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping (case study: Zab basin). Arab J Geosci 6:3885–3907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Khezri S, Bin Ahmad B, Hashim M (2014) Landslide susceptibilitymapping at central Zab basin, Iran: a comparison between analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Catena 115:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RK, Alavalapatı JRR, Kalmbacher RS (2004) Exploring the Potential for Silvopasture Adoption in South-central Florida: an Applicationof SWOT-AHP Method. Agric Syst 81:185–199

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upreti BN, Dhital MR (1996) Landslide studies and Management in Nepal. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu 87 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Hervás J, Jaedicke C, Malet J-P, Montanarella L, Nadim F (2012) Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data. Landslides 9:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (1993) Application of geographical information system to landslide hazard zonation. ITC publication no 15. ITC, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 48:2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind Y, Saaty TL (1980) Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 26(7):641–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçın A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was not supported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerem Hepdeniz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Code availability

The software application is available (ArcGIS 10, AHP Template).

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hepdeniz, K. Using the analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Isparta-Antalya highway (D-685), Turkey. Arab J Geosci 13, 795 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05764-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05764-2

Keywords

Navigation