Abstract
After the occurrence of an earthquake near Cairo on October 1992 (Mw 5.8), the Egyptian authorities established the Egyptian National Seismological Network (ENSN), which was targeted to monitor the seismic activity in and around Egypt. The ENSN started operation in 1997 with 66 stations installed by the National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG). Almost 55,000 events were recorded up until 2018 since the time of ENSN’s operation. After more than 20 years of establishing ENSN, a scientific project was funded to review the detectability of the stations by different methods; so, the goal of this research is to evaluate the magnitude of completeness (Mc) which represents an important parameter for instrumental catalog studies using different catalog-based methods. The Mc is calculated based on deflection from the linear relation of frequency-magnitude of the recorded events in ENSN’s catalog. Calculation of Mc is indispensable for knowing and clarifying the seismicity parameters such as the b value in the Gutenberg-Richter equation. Three different methods were used, i.e., maximum curvature method (MAXC), b value stability approach (MBS), and entire magnitude range method (EMR). The results determine the variations among different methods, up to 0.5 magnitudes unit is observed. The importance of this study comes from its concentrate on the detectability of ENSN’s stations to show their efficiency for recording seismic events with high accuracy and for contributing in evaluation of seismic hazard in Egypt, in seismic engineering applications to mitigate earthquake risk, and in changing the position of bad recording stations to a quieter place with minimum noise level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel Hafiez HE (2015a) Estimating the magnitude of completeness for assessing the quality of earthquake catalogue of the ENSN, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 8(11):9315–9323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1929-x
Abdel Hafiez HE (2015b) Magnitude scales regression for Egyptian seismological network. Arab J Geosci 8(10):7941–7954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1807-6
Abdel Hafiez HE, Tawfiek A (2020) A review of the Egyptian National Seismological Network after 20 years of operation. NRIAG J Astronomy Geophys 9:330–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/20909977.2020.1744802
Abdel Hafiez HE, Toni M (2019) Ambient noise level and site characterization in northern Egypt, Pure Appl. Geophys. 176(2019):2349–2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02112-8
Amorèse D (2007) Applying a change-point detection method on frequency-magnitude distributions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1742–1749. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060181
Cao A, Gao SS (2002) Temporal variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc. Geophys Res Lett 29(9):48–41. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013775
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34(4):185–188
Habermann RE (1987) Man-made changes of seismicity rates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(1):141–159
Hussein HM, Abou Elenean KM, Marzouk IA, Peresan A, Korrat IM, Abu El-Nader E, Panza GF, El-Gabry MN (2008) Integration and magnitude homogenization of the Egyptian earthquake catalogue. Nat Hazards 47:525–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9237-3
Ishimoto M (1936) Observations of earthquakes registered with the microseismograph constructed recently. Bull Earthq Res Inst, Univ Tokyo 17:443–478
Kebeasy, R.M. (1990). Induced seismicity and changes in water level at Aswan Reservoir, Egypt, Gerlands Beitragezur Geophysik
Mignan A, Werner MJ, Wiemer S, Chen CC, Wu YM (2011) Bayesian estimation of the spatially varying completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(3):1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100223
Ormeni R, ÖZTÜRK S, Akli F, ÇELIK K (2017) Spatial and temporal analysis of recent seismicity in different parts of the Vlora-Lushnja-Elbasani-Dibra Transversal Fault Zone, Albania. Austrian JEarth Sci 110(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.17738/ajes.2017.0015
Polat O, Goek E, Yilmaz D (2008) Earthquake hazard of the Aegean extension region (West Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 17:593–614
Rydelek PA, Sacks IS (1989) Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogs and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature 337:251–253 4, 7, 14, 15, 23, 24
Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(4):859–869. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990114
Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2):684–698. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007
Zúñiga FR, Wyss M (1995) Inadvertent changes in magnitude reported in earthquake catalogs: their evaluation through b-value estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(6):1858–1866
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the Department of Seismology, NRIAG, Egypt, for providing this study with seismic data.
Funding
This project was supported financially by the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt (Grant No. 25553).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Current Advances in Geological Research of Egypt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hafiez, H.E.A., Toni, M. Magnitude of completeness for the Northern stations of the Egyptian National Seismological Network. Arab J Geosci 13, 458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05461-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05461-0