Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of short-term litter manipulation on rangeland production, soil carbon, and nitrogen contents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the response of plant communities to litter removal or addition plays an important role in the sustainable management of rangelands. In this study, we investigated the effect of different litter removal and addition treatments on the annual forage production and on soil carbon and nitrogen contents of four rangeland communities in arid to semiarid areas of Iran. The results showed that litter removal reduced the contents of carbon and nitrogen in soil and the annual forage production. There was an 80% drop in annual forage production of Artemisia aucheri stand when whole litter mass was removed. The litter removal increased the annual production in Saccharum bengalense stand, and the highest forage production increment was seen when 50% of litter was removed. There was no significant difference between legume and non-legume plant stands owing to variations of soil nitrogen content. Due to the allelopathic effects in Artemisia aucheri stand, litter manipulation had no effect on the annual growth of annuals. The litter quality was more correlated to soil C and N contents and to annual forage production than to litter quantity in plant stands. Plant stands in semiarid rangelands were more sensitive to litter removal than to litter addition. Generally, short-term litter manipulation for a growing season had greater impacts on shrubland communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R, de Caluwe H, Beltman B (2003) Plant community mediated vs. nutritional controls on litter decomposition rates in grasslands. Ecology 84:3198–3208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angerer JP (2012) Technologies, tools and methodologies for forage evaluation in grasslands and rangelands. In: Coughenour, M.B., Harinder P.S., Makkar, H.P.S. FAO Conducting national feed assessments. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 15, Rome, Italy, pp 165-200

  • Austin AT, Vivanco L (2006) Plant litter decomposition in a semi arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benchadi W, Haba H, Lavaud C, Harakat D, Benkhaled M (2013) Secondary metabolites of Astragalus cruciatus link. And their chemotaxonomic significance. Rec Nat Prod 7:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Matzner E (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey R, Health I, Williams D (2000) Estimation of carbon budget model of the United State Forest, Sector Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurements and Monitoring Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina, October 3-5:51-59.

  • Castro- Díez P, Fierro-Brunnenmeister N, Gonza’lez-Munoz N, Gallardo A (2012) Effects of exotic and native tree leaf litter on soil properties of two contrasting sites in the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Soil 350:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C, Hobbie S, Venterea R, Tilman D (2009) Long-lasting effects on nitrogen cycling 12 years after treatments cease despite minimal long-term nitrogen retention. Glob Chang Biol 15:1755–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DC, Crossley DA, Hendrix PF (2004) Fundamentals of soil ecology. Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Perez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, Bodegom PV, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Diaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren RA, Singer MJ, Huang X (1997) Oak tree and grazing impacts on soil properties and nutrients in a California oak woodland. Biogeochem 39:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KW, Bates JD, Boyd CS (2016) Effects of intermediate-term grazing rest on Sagebrush communities with depleted understories: evidence of a threshold. Rangel Ecol Manag 69:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath TW, Eckstein RL (2008) Grass and oak litter exert different effects on seedling emergence of herbaceous perennials from grasslands and woodlands. J Ecol 96:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans RD, Rimer R, Sperry L, Belnap J (2001) Exotic plant invasion alters nitrogen dynamics in an arid grassland. Ecol Appl 11:1301–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facelli JM, Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev 57:2–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedel MH (1981) Studies of central Australian semi desert rangelands. I. range condition and the biomass dynamics of the herbage layer and litter. Aust J Bot 29:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao D, Wang X, Fu S, Zhao J (2017) Legume plants enhance the resistance of soil to ecosystem disturbance. Front Plant Sci 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01295

  • Groves CR, Anderson JE (1981) Allelopathic effects of Artemisia tridentata leaves on germination and growth of two grass species. Am Midl Nat 106:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry HAL, Brizgys K, Field CB (2008) Litter decomposition in a California annual grassland: interactions between photodegradation and litter layer thickness. Ecosystems 11:545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz JM, Ferrandis P, Copete MA, Duro EM, Zalacaın A (2006) Effect of allelopathic compounds produced by Cistus ladanifer on germination of 20 Mediterranean taxa. Plant Ecol 184:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hierro JL, Callaway RM (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil 256:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högberg P, Näsholm T, Franklin O, Högberg MN (2017) Tamm review: on the nature of the nitrogen limitation to plant growth in Fennoscandian boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 403:161–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit STR, Callaway RM, Pollock JL, Kaur J (2008) Allelopathy and plant invasions: traditional, congeneric and bio-geographical approaches. Biol Invasions 10:875–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jogar U, Moora M (2008) Reintroduction of a rare plant (Gladiolus imbricatus) population to a river floodplain - How important is meadow management? Restor Ecol 16:382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr M, Frey SD, Curtis PS (2005) Nitrogen additions and litter decomposition: a meta-analysis. Ecology 86:3252–3257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman A, Cammeraat E (2010) Biological control of beech and hornbeam affects species richness via changes in the organic layer, pH and soil moisture characteristics. Funct Ecol 24:469–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koorem K, Price JN, Moora M (2011) Species-specific effects of woody litter on seedling emergence and growth of herbaceous plants. PLoS One 6:e26505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration, Forest Ecol. Manag 220:242–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Houérou HN (2009) Bioclimatology and Biogeography of Africa. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, p 241

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liao JD, Boutton TW (2008) Soil microbial biomass responsento woody plant invasion of grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge GM, McCormick LH, Harde S (2005) Grazing studies of a Saccharum bengalense (Coolatai grass) pasture in northern New South Wales. Aust J Exp Agric 45:1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge GM, Murphy SR (2005) Ground cover in temperate native perennial grass pasture. II. Relationship with herbage and litter mass. The Rangeland Journal 24:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loydi A, Lohse K, Otte A, Donath TW, Eckstein RL (2013) Distribution and effects of tree leaf litter on vegetation composition and biomass in a forest–grassland ecotone. Plant Ecol 7:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaney WM, Smemon KA, Gross KL (2008) Impacts of C4 grass introductions on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling in C3-dominated successional systems. Oecologia 157:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrparvar M (2017) Aphids living on Artemisia and Scorzonera plants (Asteraceae) in Iran: Macrosiphoniella vallesiacae Jörg and Lample, 1988 and Uroleucon pilosellae (Börner, 1933) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) as new records. J Insect Biodivers Syst 3(1):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SRG, Lodge M, Harden S (2004) Surface soil water dynamics in pastures in northern New South Wales. 3. Evapotranspiration. Aust J Exp Agric 44:571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabeel M, Fawzia MR (2006) Allelopathic effect of Artemisia sieberi on germination and seedling growth of Anabasis setifera. Pakistan j boil Sci 9:1795–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeth MA (1988) The impact of grazing on litter and hydrology in mixed prairie and fescue grassland ecosystems of Alberta. Ph.D. Diss. Univ. of Alberta

  • Nosetto MD, Jobbagyand EG, Paruelo JM (2006) Carbon sequestration in semi-arid rangelands. Arid Environments 67:142–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrol N, Gonzalez L, Reigosa ML (2006) Allelopathy and abiotic stress. A Physiological Process with Ecological Implications, Netherlands, pp 171–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng SL, Ren H, Wu JG, Lu HF (2003) Effects of litter removal on plant species diversity: a case study in tropical Eucalyptus forest ecosystems in South China. J Environ Sci 15:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Quested H, Eriksson O (2006) Litter species composition influences the performance of seedlings of grassland herbs. Funct Ecol 20:522–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodtassana C, Tanner EVJ (2018) Litter removal in a tropical rain forest reduces fine root biomass and production but litter addition has few effects. Ecology 99:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez-Plaza P, Navas MJ, Wybraniec S, Michałowski T, Asuero AG (2013) An overview of the Kjeldahl Method of nitrogen determination. Part II. Sample preparation, working scale, instrumental finish, and quality control, critical reviews in analytical chemistry 43:224-272.

  • Sharafatmandrad M, Bahremand A, Mesdaghi M, Barani H (2010) The role of rainfall and light interception by litter on maintenance of surface soil water content in an arid rangeland (Khabr National Park, southeast of Iran). Desert 15:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelef O, Groner E (2011) Linking landscape and species: effect of shrubs on patch preference of beetles in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. J Arid Environ 75:960–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Verma PK, Singh G (2012) Total phenolic, flavonoids and tannin contents in different extracts of Artemisia absinthium. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol 1:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (1991) Nitrogen mineralization in dry tropical savanna: effects of burning and grazing. Soil Biol Biochem 23:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiesman BJ, Kummel H, Jackson R (2018) Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C4 to C3 grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies. Oecologia 186:565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavili A, Janat Rostami M, Ebrahimi Darche K (2008) Inhibitory effects of Artemisia sieberi on germination properties of Salsola rigida. Iranian J Range Desert Res 6:409–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AD, Elliott DR, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Hoon SR, Sen R (2018) The influence of trees, shrubs, and grasses on microclimate, soil carbon, nitrogen, and CO2 efflux: potential implications of shrub encroachment for Kalahari rangelands. Land Degrad Dev 29:1306–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RJ, Asakawa NM (1993) Decomposition of leaf litter from tropical forage grasses and legumes. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1351–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Richarte J, Navas ML (2006) Effects of litter and standing biomass on growth and reproduction of two annual species in a Mediterranean old-field. J Ecol 94:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JC, Fuls A, Danin A (1986) Geographical and environmental distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in the Sinai, Negev, and Judean deserts. Oecologia 70:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang Q (2013) Cultivating erect milkvetch (Astragalus adsurgens Pall.) (Leguminosae) improved soil properties in loess hilly and gullies in China. Oecologia 186:565–576

  • Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Taylor PG, Nemergut DR, Hinckley EL, Philippot L, Weintraub SR, Martin M, Townsend AR (2013) Experimental removal and addition of leaf litter inputs reduces nitrate production and loss in a lowland tropical forest. Biogeochemistry 113:629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Zammit CA (1992) Tree litter and the lower limits of subalpine herbs and grasses in the Brindabella Range, ACT. Aust J Ecol 17:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Nilsson C (1999) The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 87:984–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Jia ZQ (2014) Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen capacities of Salix cheilophila Schneid along a revegetation chronosequence in semi-arid degraded sandy land of the Gonghe Basin, Tibet Plateau. Solid Earth 5:1045–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavaleta ES, Shaw MR, Chiariello NR, Thomas BD, Cleland EE, Field CB, Mooney HA (2003) Grassland responses to three years of elevated temperature, CO2, precipitation, and N deposition. Ecol Monogr 73:585–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still CJ, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, DeFries RS (2003) Global distribution of C and C vegetation: Carbon cycle implications . Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17 (1):6-1-6-14

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Bandar Abbas Road, 7867161167, Jiroft, Iran

    Mohsen Sharafatmandrad & Azam Khosravi Mashizi

Authors
  1. Mohsen Sharafatmandrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azam Khosravi Mashizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Sharafatmandrad.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Amjad Kallel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharafatmandrad, M., Khosravi Mashizi, A. Impacts of short-term litter manipulation on rangeland production, soil carbon, and nitrogen contents. Arab J Geosci 13, 393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05422-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05422-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation