Skip to main content
Log in

Testing and constitutive modelling of the mechanical behaviours of gravelly soil material

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, large-scale triaxial compression tests are conducted on gravelly soil material. The experimental investigation shows that gravelly soil exhibits complicated volume-dilatation/contraction behaviours that are dependent on stress level. To better describe the mechanical behaviours, an elastoplastic constitutive model is proposed within the frameworks of generalised plasticity and the critical state soil mechanics. An evolution equation of the void ratio is incorporated into the model to describe the effect of a relatively dense or loose state on the volume-change behaviours. The model has 10 material constants that could be determined using a few large-scale conventional triaxial tests. The model is then used to simulate the mechanical behaviours of gravelly soil. Comparisons between the numerical simulations and the test data show that the model is capable of capturing the mechanical behaviours of gravelly soil under various confining pressures. This research can be beneficial for understanding the mechanical behaviours of gravelly soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Geotechnique 35:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z-Y, Li X-M, Han L, Guan Y-F (2016) Critical state of rockfill materials considering particle gradation and breakage. Chin J Geotech Eng 38:1357–1364 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophe D (2011) A constitutive model for granular materials considering grain breakage. Scie China Technol Sci 54:2188–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafalias YF, Manzari MT (2004) Simple plasticity sand model accounting for Fabric Change Effects. J Eng Mech 130:622–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Huang R-Q, Gao Q-F (2017) Rainfall infiltration performance and its relation to mesoscopic structural properties of a gravelly soil slope. Eng Geol 230:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Q-F, Dong H, Huang R, Li Z-F (2019) Structural characteristics and hydraulic conductivity of an eluvial-colluvial gravelly soil. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:5011–5028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W-L, Zhu J-G, Peng W-M (2017) Study on dilatancy equation and generalized plastic constitutive model for coarse-grained soil. Chin J Geotech Eng 32:1–7 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi A, Yazdanjou V, Salimi N (2013) Shear strength characteristics of sand-gravel mixtures. Int J Geotech Eng 3:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Richart FE (1963) Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 89:33–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang SL, Ding XL, Zhang YT, Cheng W (2015) Triaxial test and mechanical analysis of rock-soil aggregate sampled from natural sliding mass. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Indraratna B, Salim W (2002) Modeling of particle breakage of coarse aggregates incorporating strength and dilatancy. Geotech Eng 155:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia YF, Xu B, Chi SC, Xiang B, Zhou Y (2017) Research on the particle breakage of rockfill materials during triaxial tests. Int J Geomech 17:04017085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YR (2013) Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MC, Gao YF (2016) Constitutive modeling of coarse-grained materials incorporating the effect of particle breakage on critical state behavior in a framework of generalized plasticity. Int J Geomech 17:04016113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HB, Zou DG (2013) Associated generalized plasticity framework for modeling gravelly soils considering particle breakage. J Eng Mech 139:606–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JM, Zou DG, Kong XJ, Liu HB (2016) Stress-dilatancy of Zipingpu gravel in triaxial compression tests. Sci China Technol Sci 59:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor M, Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC (1990) Generalized plasticity and the modelling of soil behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 14:151–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH, Schofield AN, Wroth CP (2008) On the yielding of soils. Géotechnique 8:22–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saberi M, Annan CD, Konrad JM (2017) Constitutive modeling of gravelly soil–structure interface considering particle breakage. J Eng Mech 143:04017044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Luo X-Q, Bi J-F (2018) An alternative method for internal stability prediction of gravelly soil. KSCE J Civ Eng 22:1141–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukkarak R, Pramthawee P, Jongpradist P (2017) A modified elasto-plastic model with double yield surfaces and considering particle breakage for the settlement analysis of high rockfill dams. KSCE J Civ Eng 21:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Q, Tang H, Fan L, Xiong C, Fan Z, Zhao M, Li C, Wang D, Zou Z (2018) In situ triaxial creep test for investigating deformational properties of gravelly sliding zone soil: example of the Huangtupo 1# landslide, China. Landslides 15:2499–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng MC, Chu BL, Ho YL (2013) Elastoplastic deformation characteristics of gravelly soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 139:947–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Liu H (2017) Elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage. Int J Geomech 17:04016041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu WJ, Xu Q, Hu RL (2011) Study on the shear strength of soil–rock mixture by large scale direct shear test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1235–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Tang H, Zhan H, Lei G, Cheng H (2015) Investigation of scale effect of numerical unconfined compression strengths of virtual colluvial–deluvial soil–rock mixture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H-Y, Xu W-J, Yu Y-Z (2016a) Numerical analysis of soil-rock mixture's meso-mechanics based on biaxial test. J Cent South Univ 23:685–700

  • Zhang HY, Xu WJ, Yu YZ (2016b) Triaxial tests of soil–rock mixtures with different rock block distributions. Soils Found 56:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Pande GN (1977) Some useful forms of isotropic yield surface for soil and rock mechanics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work presented in this paper were financially supported by Open Funds at the Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area (China Three Gorges University), Ministry of Education (Grant No. 2015KDZ16 and 2015KDZ15) and by Open Fund Research at the State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University (Grant No. SKHL1725).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ru-Bin Wang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Abdullah Al-Amri

Appendix: Notations and definitions

Appendix: Notations and definitions

In this study, some important qualities related to stress and strain are defined. The mean stress p, deviatoric stress q and Lode’s angle θ are respectively calculated using:

$$ p=\frac{1}{3}{\sigma}_{\mathrm{kk}},\kern1em q=\sqrt{1.5{s}_{\mathrm{ij}}{s}_{\mathrm{ij}}},\kern1em \theta =\frac{1}{3}{\sin}^{-1}\left(-\frac{27{J}_3}{2{q}^3}\right) $$
(25)

where σkk with a subscript of double “kk” denotes the sum calculation of the tensor, namely, σkk = σ11 + σ22 + σ33, sij is the deviatoric stress tensor, namely, sij = σij − ij, δij is the Kronecker tensor, with i = j, δij = 1; i ≠ j, δij = 0, and J3 is the third invariant of the deviatoric stress tensor, namely, J3 = det sij.

The volumetric strain εv and equivalent shear strain \( {\overline{\gamma}}_{\mathrm{s}} \) are calculated using:

$$ {\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{v}}={\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{kk}},\kern1em {\overline{\gamma}}_{\mathrm{s}}=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}\left({\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{ij}}-\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{v}}{\delta}_{\mathrm{ij}}}{3}\right)\left({\varepsilon}_{\mathrm{ij}}-\frac{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{v}}{\delta}_{\mathrm{ij}}}{3}\right)} $$
(26)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, JC., Li, Y., Xu, B. et al. Testing and constitutive modelling of the mechanical behaviours of gravelly soil material. Arab J Geosci 13, 523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05385-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05385-9

Keywords

Navigation