Skip to main content
Log in

Riverbank retreat analysis of the U-Tapao River, southern Thailand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riverbank retreat is a result of complex combinations of several processes, including subaerial processes, fluvial erosion, and bank failure. The objective of this study was to analyze riverbank retreat of six representative riverbanks along the U-Tapao River in southern Thailand using a process-based riverbank retreat model. Field and laboratory tests were conducted to determine index and engineering properties of the riverbank soil required in the modeling. In particular, the erodibility parameters of the riverbank soil were estimated using empirical formulae, measured in situ by performing a submerged jet test, and estimated from long-term bank retreat simulations using the Bank Stability and Toe Erosion Model (BSTEM) incorporated with a lumped adjustment factor. The observed bank retreat over the period from 2002 to 2016 obtained from analysis of aerial imagery was used to verify the validity of the riverbank retreat results. Good agreement with the observations was obtained from BSTEMs using adjusted erodibility parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Madhhachi AT, Hanson GJ, Fox GA, Tyagi AK, Bulut R (2013) Deriving parameters of a fundamental detachment model for cohesive soils from flume and jet erosion tests. T ASABE 56(2):489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee on Hydraulics, Bank Mechanics, and Modeling of River Width Adjustment (1998) River width adjustment: I processes and mechanisms. J Hydraul Eng 124(9):881–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisdell FW, Anderson CL, Hebaus GG (1981) Ultimate dimensions of local scour. J Hydraul Eng Div 107(HY3):327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Briaud JL, Ting FCK, Chen HC, Cao Y, Han SW, Kwak KW (2001) Erosion function apparatus for scour rate predictions. J Geotech Geoenviron ASCE 127(2):105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camporeale C, Perona P, Porporato A, Ridolfi L (2007) Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Rev Geophys 45:RG1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancienne RM, Fox GA, Simon A (2008) Influence of seepage undercutting on the stability of root-reinforced streambanks. Earth Surf Proc Land 33(1):1769–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LA, Wynn TM (2007) Methods for determining streambank critical shear stress and soil erodibility: implications for erosion rate predictions. T ASABE 50(1):95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper PR, Maddock IP (2001) Subaerial river bank erosion processes and their interaction with other bank erosion mechanisms on the River Arrow, Warwickshire, UK. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly ER, Fox GA, Al-Madhhachi AT, Miller RB (2013) A scour depth approach for deriving erodibility parameters from jet erosion tests. T ASABE 56(6):1343–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly ER, Miller RB, Fox GA (2015) Modeling streambank erosion and failure along protected and unprotected composite streambanks. Adv Water Resour 81:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissinger EH, Little WC, Murphey JB (1981) Erodibility of streambank materials of low cohesion. T ASAE 24(3):624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissinger EH (1982) Bank erosion in cohesive materials. In: Hey RD, Bathurst JC, Thorne CR (eds) Gravel-bed rivers. John Wiley, pp. 273–287

  • Grissinger EH, Bowie AJ, Murphey JB (1991) Goodwin Creek bank instability and sediment yield. Proceeding of the 5th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, pp PS-32–PS-39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ (1990a) Surface erodibility of earthen channels at high stresses: Part I. Open channel testing. T ASABE 33(1):127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ (1990b) Surface erodibility of earthen channels at high stresses: Part II. Developing an in situ testing device. T ASABE 33(1):132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ, Cook KR (1997) Development of excess shear stress parameters for circular jet testing. ASAE Paper No. 972227. ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ, Cook KR, Simon A (1999) Determining erosion resistance of cohesive materials. Proceedings of ASCE International Water Resources Engineering Conference. Seattle, Wash, ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ, Simon A (2001) Erodibility of cohesive streambeds in the loess area of the Midwestern USA. Hydrol Process 15(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ, Temple DM (2002) Performance of bare-earth and vegetated steep channels under long-duration flows. T ASAE 45(3):695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GJ, Cook KR (2004) Apparatus, test procedures, and analytical methods to measure soil erodibility in situ. Appl Eng Agric 20(4):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke JM (1979) An analysis of the processes of riverbank erosion. J Hydrol 42:39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian JP, Torres R (2006) Hydraulic erosion of cohesive riverbanks. Geomorphology 76(1–2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphuis JW, Hall KR (1983) Cohesive material erosion by unidirectional current. J Hydraul Eng 109(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmaker T, Dutta S (2011) Erodibility of fine soil from the composite river bank of Brahmaputra in India. Hydrol Process 25(1):104–111

  • Langendoen EJ, Simon A, Alonso CV (2000) Modeling channel instabilities and mitigation strategies in Eastern Nebraska, Proceeding of the 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resource Planning and Management. ASCE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen EJ, Simon A (2008) Modeling the evolution of incised streams, II: streambank erosion. J Hydraul Eng 134(7):905–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai YG, Thomas RE, Ozeren Y, Simon A, Greimann BP, Wu K (2012) Coupling a two-dimensional model with a deterministic bank stability model. ASCE World Environmental & Water Resources Congress. Albuquerque, New Mexico May 20-24, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler DM (1992) Process dominance in bank erosion systems. In: Carling PA, Petts GE (eds) Lowland floodplain rivers, Geomorphological Perspectives. John Wiley, pp. 117–143

  • Lawler DM (1995) The impact of scale on the processes of channel-side sediment supply: a conceptual model. Effects of scale on interpretation and management of sediment and water quality. IAHS Pub 226:175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler DM, Thorne CR, Hooke JM (1997) Bank erosion and instability. In: Thorne CR, Hey RD, Newson, MD (eds) Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management. John Wiley, pp. 137–172

  • Midgley T, Fox GA, Heeren DM (2012) Evaluation of the bank stability and toe erosion model (BSTEM) for predicting lateral streambank retreat on composite streambanks. Geomorphology 145-146:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta D, Abad JD, Langendoen EJ, Garcia MH (2012) A simplified 2D model for meander migration with physically-based bank evolution. Geomorphology 163:10–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi L, Campo L, Rinaldi M (2013) Quantification of riverbank erosion and application in risk analysis. Nat Hazards 69:869–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou AN, Elhakeem M, Hilldale R (2007) Secondary current effects on cohesive river bank erosion. Water Resour Res 43:W12418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partheniades E (1965) Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils. J Hydraul Div 91:105–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Mengoni B, Luppi L, Darby SE, Mosselman E (2008) Numerical simulation of hydrodynamics and bank erosion in a river bend. Water Resour Res 44(9):W09429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Nardi L (2013) Modeling interactions between riverbank hydrology and mass failures. J Hydraul Eng 18(10):1231–1240

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmens DJ, Osterkamp WR (2001) Dam removal and reservoir erosion modeling: Zion Reservoir, Little Colorado River, AZ. Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference. March 25–29, 2001, Reno, NV, pp. IX 72–79

  • Smerdon ET, Beasley RT (1961) Critical tractive forces in cohesive soils. Agric Eng 42(1):26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A (1989) A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surf Proc Land 14:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Curini A, Darby SE, Langendoen EJ (2000) Bank and near-bank processes in an incised channel. Geomorphology 35:193–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Thomas RE (2002) Processes and forms of an unstable system with resistant, cohesive streambeds. Earth Surf Proc Land 27(7):699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Thomas RE, Klimetz L (2010) Comparison and experiences with field techniques to measure critical shear stress and erodibility of cohesive deposits. Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference on Sedimentation and Hydrologic Modeling. Reston, Va, U.S. Geological Survey. ASTM, Philadelphia, Penn

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Pollen-Bankhead N, Thomas RE (2011) Development and application of a deterministic bank stability and toe erosion model for stream restoration. In Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses, and Tools, 453-474, Geophysical Monograph Series, vol vol. 194. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoman RW, Niezgoda SL (2008) Determining erodibility, critical shear stress, and allowable discharge estimates for cohesive channels: case study in the Powder River basin of Wyoming. J Hydraul Eng 134(12):1677–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne CR (1982) Processes and mechanisms of river bank erosion. In: Hey RD, Bathurst JC, Thorne CR (eds) Gravel-bed rivers. John Wiley, pp. 227–271

  • Wan CF, Fell R (2004) Investigation of rate of erosion of soils in embankment dams. J Geotech Geoenviron 130(4):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GV, Periketi R, Fox GA, Dabney S, Shields D, Cullum RF (2007) Seepage erosion properties contributing to streambank failure. Earth Surf Proc Land 32(3):447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn T (2004) The effects of vegetation on streambank erosion. Dissertation, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech

  • Wynn TM, Mostaghimi S (2006) Effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank subaerial processes in southwestern Virginia, USA. Earth Surf Pro Land 31:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Seppo Karrila for reviewing the manuscript, Dr. Eddy Langendoen of the United States Department of Agriculture for providing BSTEM v. 5.4, and Dr. Garey Fox of Oklahoma State University for providing a JET spreadsheet for the jet test computations. Finally, the authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to the improvement of the final version of the paper.

Funding

Financial support for this study was provided by the Prince of Songkhla University and the National Research Council of Thailand, grant no. ENG570109S. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanit Chalermyanont.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semmad, S., Chalermyanont, T. Riverbank retreat analysis of the U-Tapao River, southern Thailand. Arab J Geosci 11, 295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3629-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3629-9

Keywords

Navigation