Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of electrical and magnetic methods in finding buried structure of the Alabanda Ancient Cistern in Çine Town, Aydın City, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the Electrical Resistivity Tomography and magnetic methods, including Tilt Angle and Euler Deconvolution, have been used in a comperative manner to determine the lineaments and depths of buried archeological structures. The zero contours of the tilt angle correspond to the boundaries of buried structures and the half distance between ±π/4 rad corresponds to the depth to the top of the structures. Also, in order to estimate the positions and depths of buried structures in the study area, the Euler Deconvolution method was applied to the total magnetic field data. All of the methods have a good correlation about determination of the horizontal locations and depths of the buried structures. The archeological excavations based on the geophysical investigations have demonstrated that the buried structure is an ancient cistern building because of the unearthed pools. Therefore, the interpretations of the geophysical methods and fiction of the paper were made according to the ancient cistern building. With this study, a buried ancient cistern structure was modeled and revealed by the geophysical methods for the first time. Additionally, using of these geophysical techniques in a comparative manner for the archaeogeophysical work will greatly contribute to future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anchuela OP, Blasco PD, Benito CG, Sainz AMC, Juan AP (2016) Geophysical and archaeological characterization of a modest roman villa: methodological considerations about progressive feedback analyses in sites with low geophysical contrast. Archaeol Prospect 23:105–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolopoulos GV (2014) Combined geophysical investigation for the detection of ancient metallurgical installations near Keratea City, Greece. J Appl Geophys 104:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arısoy MÖ, Koçak Ö, Büyüksaraç A, Bilim F (2007) Images of buried graves in Bayat, Afyon (Turkey) from high-resolution magnetic data and their comparison with preliminary excavations. J Archaeol Sci 34:1473–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz AM, Sauck WA, Shendi E-AH, Rashed MA, Abd El-Maksoud M (2013) Application of analytic signal and Euler Deconvolution in archaeo-magnetic prospection for buried ruins at the ancient city of Pelusium, NW Sinai, Egypt: a case study. Surv Geophys 34:395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9229-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean GE (1976) “Alabanda”, Princeton encyclopedia of classical sites, 133

  • Brinker W (1990) Wasserspeicherung in Zisternen: Ein Beitrag des Wasserversorung früher Städte. Mitteilungen des Leichweiss-Instituts für Wasserbau der Technischen Univesität Braunschweig, 109; Braunschweig

  • Büyüksaraç A, Bilim F, Ateş A, Bektaş Ö (2006) Investigation of magnetic surveying data of buried grave jars in Harmanoren Necropolis (Turkey) using linear transformations and analytic signal. J Archaeol Sci 33:910–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüksaraç A, Arısoy MÖ, Bektaş Ö, Koçak Ö, Çay T (2008) Determination of grave locations in Dedemezari Necropolis (Western Turkey) using magnetid field derivatives. Archaeol Prospect 15:267–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candansayar ME, Başokur AT (2001) Detecting small-scale targets by the 2D inversion of two-sided three-electrode data: application to an archaeological survey. Geophys Prospect 49:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claerbout JF, Muir F (1973) Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 38:826–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1985) Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan basin, New Mexico, In Hinzc WJ (Ed). The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps, Soc Expl Geophys, 181–197

  • Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophys Prospect 52:379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico D, Giannino F, Leucci G, Bottari C (2006) Integrated geophysical surveys at the archaeological site of Tindari (Sicily, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 33:961–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamanti NG, Tsokas GN, Tsourlos PI, Vafidis A (2005) Integrated interpretation of geophysical data in the archaeological site of Europos (Northern Greece). Archaeol Prospect 12:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG (2006) Integrated geophysical studies in the upper part of Sardis archaeological site, Turkey. J Appl Geophys 59:205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş TÖ, Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2008a) Magnetic and electrical resistivity tomography investigations in a Roman Legionary camp site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 15:159–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG, Kurtulmuş TÖ, Berge MA, Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2008b) Magnetic imaging and electrical resistivity tomography studies in a Roman military installation found in Satala archaeological site, northeastern Anatolia, Turkey. J Archaeol Sci 35:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG, Berge MA, Öztürk C (2011) Integrated geophysical surveys for the subsurface mapping of buried structures under and surrounding of the Agios Voukolos Church in İzmir, Turkey. J Archaeol Sci 38:2231–2242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci YL, Balkaya Ç, Şeren A, Kaya MK, Ligtfoot CS (2014) Geomagnetic and geoelectrical prospection for buried archaeological remains on the Upper City of Amorium, a Byzantine city in midwestern Turkey. J Geophys Eng 11:015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/11/1/015012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geosoft Oasis Montaj 7.0.1 Program (2008) Gravity and magnetic software, Geosoft Inc.

  • Godio A, Piro S (2005) Integrated data processing for archeological magnetic surveys. Lead Edge 24:1138–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karavul C, Dedebali Z, Keskinsezer A, Beyhan G, Demirkol A (2010) Magnetic and electrical resistivity image survey in a buried Adramytteion ancient city in western Anatolia, Turkey. Int J Phys Sci 5(6):876–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Kürkçü M (2015) Güney/güneybatı pısıdıa sarnıçlarına bir örnek: Sıa çifte sarnıcı. Cedrus III 3:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G, Greco F, Giorgi De L, Mauceri R (2007) Three-dimensional image of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography survey in the castle of Occhiola` (Sicily, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 34:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (2015) Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. www.geoelectrical.com

  • Loke MH, Acworth I, Dahlin T (2003) A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Explor Geophys 34:182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loperte A, Satriani A, Bavusi M, Lapenna V, Del Lungo S, Sabelli R, Gizzi FT (2011) Geophysical prospecting in archaeology: investigations in Santa Venera, south suburb of Poseidonia-Paestum, Campania, southern Italy. J Geophys Eng 8:S23–S32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HG, Singh V (1994) Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources. J Appl Geophys 32:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo L, Leucci G, Negri S (2009) GPR, ERT and magnetic investigations inside the Martyrium of St Philip, Hierapolis, Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 16:177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oruç B (2013) Yeraltı Kaynak Aramalarında Gravite Yöntemi (Matlab Kodları ve Çözümlü Örnekler). Umuttepe Yayınları, Kocaeli

    Google Scholar 

  • Oruç B, Selim HH (2011) Interpretation of magnetic data in the Sinop area of Mid Black Sea, Turkey, using tilt derivative, Euler deconvolution and discrete wavelet transform. J Appl Geophys 74:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Garcia V, Caselles JO, Clapes J, Osorio R, Martinez G, Canas JA (2009) Integrated near-surface geophysical survey of the Cathedral of Mallorca. J Archaeol Sci 36:1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesnel Y, Jrad A, Mocci F, Gattacceca J, Mathe PE, Parisot JC, Hermitte D, Dumas V, Dussoullez P, Walsh K, Miramont C, Bonnet S, Uehara M (2011) Geophysical signatures of a roman and early medieval necropolis. Archaeol Prospect 18:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbel W, Erkul E, Stümpel H, Wunderlich T, Pasteka R, Papco J, Niewönher P, Barış Ş, Çakın O, Pekşen E (2015) Discovery of a byzantine Church in Iznik/Nicaea, Turkey: an educational case history of geophysical prospecting with combined methods in urban areas. Archaeol Prospect 22:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravat D (1996) Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental investigations. J Environ Eng Geophys 1:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid AB, Alsop JM, Grander H, Millet AJ, Somerton IW (1990) Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem A, Williams S, Fairhead JD, Ravat DJ, Smith R (2007) Tilt-depth method: a simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives. Lead Edge 26:1502–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector A, Grant FS (1970) Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 35:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stampolidis A, Tsokas GN (2012) Use of edge delineating methods in interpreting magnetic archaeological prospection data. Archaeol Prospect 19:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DT (1982) EULDPH—a technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkov N, Loke MH (2006) A resistivity survey of a burial mound in the ‘Valley of the Thracian Kings’. Archaeol Prospect 13:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsokas GN, Sarris A, Pappa M, Bessios M, Papazachos CB, Tsourlos P, Giannopoulos A (1997) A large-scale magnetic survey in Makrygialos (Pieria), Greece. Archaeol Prospect 4:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsokas GN, Tsourlos PI, Stampolidis A, Katsonopoulou D, Soter S (2009) Tracing a major roman road in the area of ancient Helike by resistivity tomography. Archaeol Prospect 16:251–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türk S, Kaya B, Baykan O (2008) Batı akdeniz (likya) tarihi yerleşim merkezlerinin su iletim sistemleri. Deü Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Dergisi Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 sh. 43–57

  • Verduzco B, Fairhead DJ, Green MC, Mackenzie C (2004) New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. Lead Edge 23:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijns CCP, Kowalczyk P (2005) Theta map: edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics 70:L39–L43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolke R, Schwetlick H (1988) Iteratively reweighted least squares algorithms, convergence analysis, and numerical comparisons. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 9:907–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Dahlin T (2003) Properties and effects of measurements errors on 2D resistivity imaging. Near surface. Geophysics 1:105–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Karaaslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karaaslan, H., Karavul, C. Usefulness of electrical and magnetic methods in finding buried structure of the Alabanda Ancient Cistern in Çine Town, Aydın City, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11, 178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3524-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3524-4

Keywords

Navigation