Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC framework and GIS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater management has a prominent role in the world especially in arid and semi-arid areas which have a shortage of water, and due to this serious problem, many researchers work on that for prevention and managing the water recourses to conserve and monitor sources. DRASTIC index can be put forward for estimating of groundwater vulnerability to such pollution. The main purpose of using the groundwater vulnerability model is to map groundwater susceptibility to pollution in different areas. However, this method has been used in various areas without modification, disregarding the effects of pollution type and characteristics. Thus, this technique must be standardized and approved for Kerman plain. Vulnerability evaluation to explain areas that are more vulnerable to contamination from anthropogenic sources has become a prominent element for land use planning and tangible resource management. This contribution aims at evaluating groundwater vulnerability by applying the DRASTIC index as well as employ sensitivity analyses to evaluate the comparative prominent of the model parameters for groundwater vulnerability in Kerman plain in the southeastern part of Iran. Moreover, the potential of vulnerability to pollution is more accurately assessed by optimizing the weights of the DRASTIC parameters with the single-parameter sensitivity analysis (SPSA). The new weights were calculated. The result of the study revealed that the DRASTIC-Sensitivity analysis exhibit more efficiently than the traditional method for a nonpoint source pollution. Observation of ultimate nitrate showed the result of DRASTIC-SPSA has more accuracy. The GIS method offers an efficient environment for carrying out assessments and greater capabilities for dealing with a huge quantity of spatial data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. EPA/600/2–87/035. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, USA

  • Babiker IS, Mohamed MA, Hiyama TKato K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345(1):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher Frey H, Patil SR (2002) Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal 22(3):553–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fijani E, Nadiri AA, Asghari Moghaddam A, Tsai FTC, Dixon B (2013) Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer. Iran J Hydrol 503:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focazio, M. J. (2002) Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers (Vol. 1224). US Dept. of the Interior, US Geological Survey

  • Focazio MJ, Kolpin DW, Barnes KK, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Zaugg SD, Larry B, Thurman ME (2008) A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States—II) Untreated drinking water sources. Sci Total Environ 402(2):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangadharan R, Nila Rekha P, Vinoth S (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability mapping using AHP method in coastal watershed of shrimp farming area. Arab J Geosci 2:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao J, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Wang H, Niu C, Gan Y, Gong Y (2017) Assessing groundwater vulnerability and its inconsistency with groundwater quality, based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Chaoyang District of Beijing City. Arab J Geosci 10(6):144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua S, Liang J, Zeng G, Xu M, Zhang C, Yuan Y, Li X, Li P, Liu J, Huang L (2015) How to manage future groundwater resource of China under climate change and urbanization: an optimal stage investment design from modern portfolio theory. Water Res 85:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huan H, Wang J, Teng Y (2012) Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Sci. Total Environ 440:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Zeng G, Liang J, Hua S, Yuan Y, Li X, Liu J (2017) Combined impacts of land use and climate change in the modeling of future groundwater vulnerability. J Hydrol Eng 22(7):05017007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari F, Javadi S, Golmohammadi G, Mohammadi K, Khodadadi A, Mohammadzadeh M (2016) Groundwater risk mapping prediction using mathematical modeling and the Monte Carlo technique. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari SM, Nikoo MR (2016) Groundwater risk assessment based on optimization framework using DRASTIC method. Arab J Geosci 9(20):742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi S, Hashemy SM, Mohammadi K, Howard KWF, Neshat A (2017) Classification of aquifer vulnerability using K-means cluster analysis. J Hydrol 549(27):37

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadi S, Kavehkar N, Mohammadi K, Khodadadi A, Kahawita R (2011) Calibrating DRASTIC using field measurements, sensitivity analysis and statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability. Water Int 36(6):719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal JAR, Castillo RR (2003) Aquifer vulnerability mapping in the Turbio river valley, Mexico: a validation study. Geofis Int 42(1):141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Merchant JW (2013) Modeling vulnerability of groundwater to pollution under future scenarios of climate change and biofuels-related land use change: a case study in North Dakota, USA. Sci. Total Environ 447:32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Feng C, Zeng G, Gao X, Zhong M, Li X, Li X, He X, Fang Y (2017a) Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in surface soils in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, China. Environ Pollut 225:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Zhong M, Zeng G, Chen G, Hua S, Li X, Yuan Y, Wu H, Gao X (2017b) Risk management for optimal land use planning integrating ecosystem services values: a case study in Changsha, Middle China. Sci Total Environ 579:1675–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimi ZA, Mahmoud N, Madi MA (2012) Modified DRASTIC assessment for intrinsic vulnerability mapping of karst aquifers: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 66(2):447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogaji KA, Lim HS, Abdullah K (2013) Modeling groundwater vulnerability prediction using geographic information system (GIS)-based ordered weighted average (OWA) method and DRASTIC model theory hybrid approach. Arab J Geosci:1–21

  • Morris BL, Lawrence AR, Chilton PJ, Adams BB, Calow R, Klinck BA (2003) Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation: a global assessment of the problem and options for management. Early Warning Report Series, RS 03-3, UNEP, Nairobi

  • Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Moghaddam AA (2017c) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:8562–8577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S, AA( M (2017a) Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by supervised intelligence committee machine (SICM). Sci Total Environ 691(706):574

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri AA, Sedghi Z, Khatibi R, Gharekhani M (2017b) Mapping vulnerability of multiple aquifers using multiple models and fuzzy logic to objectively derive model structures. Sci Total Environ 593:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty, 1th edn. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B (2015a) An integrated DRASTIC model using frequency ratio and two new hybrid methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards 76:543–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B (2015b) Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS. Nat Hazards 78(3):1565–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014c) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Javadi S (2015) Risk assessment of groundwater pollution using Monte Carlo approach in an agricultural region: an example from Kerman Plain, Iran. Comput Environ Urban Syst 50:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Pirasteh S, Shafri HZM (2014a) Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 71(7):3119–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat A, Pradhan B, Shafri HZM (2014b) An integrated GIS based statistical model to compute groundwater vulnerability index for decision maker in agricultural area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 42(4):777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan BT, Hitt KJ (2006) Vulnerability of shallow groundwater and drinking-water wells to nitrate in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 40(24):7834–7840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco FA, Sanches Fernandes LF (2013) The multivariate statistical structure of DRASTIC model. J Hydrol 476:442–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghfam S, Hassanzadeh Y, Nadiri AA, M( Z (2016) Localization of groundwater vulnerability assessment using catastrophe theory. Water Resour Manag 30(13):4585–4601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben Dhia H, Anselme B (2011) Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel. Agric. Water Manag 98(10):1671–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun ZB (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):2293–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha MK, Verma MK, Ahmad I, Baier K, Jha R, Azzam R (2016) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using modified DRASTIC model in Kharun Basin, Chhattisgarh, India. Arab J Geosci 9(2):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Merkel BJ, Li Y, Ye H, Fu S, Ihm D (2007) Vulnerability of groundwater in quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuhan City, China. Environ Geol 53(3):479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Zhang E, Wang X, Wenninger J, Dong J, Guo L, Huang J (2013) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the Ordos Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 69(1):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aminreza Neshat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neshat, A., Pradhan, B. Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC framework and GIS. Arab J Geosci 10, 501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3292-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3292-6

Keywords

Navigation