Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Property rights in urban regeneration projects in Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The world’s urban population has increased rapidly since the 1950s mainly because of rural-to-urban migration. This rapid increase has led to the construction of illegal settlements, in particular, in the megacities of developing countries. Being one of those countries, Turkey has more than two million squats and a large number of unlicensed buildings. Considering that a large part of the country lies on an earthquake zone, this low-quality building stock is a big threat to their inhabitants. Moreover, this issue can only be eliminated with the renewal of the unsafe buildings. At this point, urban regeneration (UR) projects that are in progress in the country are a powerful tool for providing safe and healthy building stock and environments. In this paper, we describe the Turkish method of UR and the property rights given to stakeholders, discuss the issues experienced in the projects, and provide some solutions for the aforementioned issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFAD (2015) Deprem Bölgeleri Haritası, T.C. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/Shared/DepremHaritalari.aspx. Accessed 09/07/2015.

  • Akkar Ercan M (2011) Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul. Habitat Int 35:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baharoglu D, Leitmann J (1998) Coping strategies for infrastructure: How Turkey’s spontaneous settlements operate in the absence of formal rules. Habitat Int 22:115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud A, Brueckner JK (2005) Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Sci Urban Econ 35:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cete M, Durduran SS, Geymen A (2009) Urban information systems in Turkey P I Civil Eng-Munic 162:103–109 doi:10.1680/muen.2009.162.2.103

  • DESA-UN (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). United Nations,

  • Elicin Y (2014) Neoliberal transformation of the Turkish city through the Urban Transformation Act. Habitat Int 41:150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erman T (2001) The politics of squatter (gecekondu) studies in Turkey: the changing representations of rural migrants in the academic discourse. Urban Stud 38:983–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Güzey Ö (2009) Urban regeneration and increased competitive power: Ankara in an era of globalization. Cities 26:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan GF (2012) Regeneration as an approach for the development of informal settlements in Cairo metropolitan Alexandria. Engineering J 51:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • He S (2007) State-sponsored gentrification under market transition the case of Shanghai. Urban Aff Rev 43:171–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandilli Rasathanesi (2015) Büyük depremler, BOUN KOERI regional earthquake-tsunami monitoring center, Bogazici University. See http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/2/deprem-bilgileri/buyuk-depremler/ (accessed 09/07/2015).

  • Karadağ A, Mirioğlu G (2012) Bayraklı Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesi Üzerine Coğrafi Değerlendirmeler. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 57:21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Keleş R (1997) Kentleşme politikası. İmge Kitabevi,

  • Keleş R (2006) Kentleşme Politikası, Dokuzuncu Baskı İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, 780s

  • Özmen B (2014) Assessment of the statistical earthquake hazard parameters for the central Anatolia region, Turkey Arabian J Geosci:1–11

  • TBMM (2010) Deprem Riskinin Araştırılarak deprem Yönetiminde Alınmasi Gereken Önlemlerin Belirlenmesi Amacıyla Kurulan Meclis Araştırması Komisyonu Raporu. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • TMMOB (2004) Kaçak Yapılaşma İle İlgili Süreçler, Sorunlar, Çözüm Onerileri Değerlendirme Raporu. TMMOB,

  • TOKİ (2014) The Housing Development Administration http://www.toki.gov.tr. Accessed February 6, 2014

  • UN-Habitat (2003) The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements 2003.

  • Uysal ÜE (2012) An urban social movement challenging urban regeneration: the case of Sulukule. Istanbul Cities 29:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun B, Çete M, Palancıoğlu HM (2010) Legalizing and upgrading illegal settlements in Turkey. Habitat Int 34:204–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakode HB, Baier K, Jha R, Azzam R (2014) Analysis of urban growth using Landsat TM/ETM data and GIS—a case study of Hyderabad. India Arabian J Geosci 7:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng HW, Shen GQ, Wang H (2014) A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat Int 41:272–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Office of Scientific Research Projects at Izmir Katip Celebi University that funded this study under the project entitled “Property Issues Experienced in Urban Transformation Projects and Proposals for Resolutions: Case Study of Izmir”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Cete.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cete, M., Konbul, Y. Property rights in urban regeneration projects in Turkey. Arab J Geosci 9, 459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2496-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2496-5

Keywords

Navigation