Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stones of Göbeklitepe, SE Anatolia, Turkey: an Example of the Shaping of Cultural Heritage by Local Geology Since the Early Neolithic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Göbeklitepe is an UNESCO World Heritage site located in SE Turkey, dating back to 11.7 ka BCE. It consists of laterally aligned, circular rooms without doors and T-shaped limestone columns up to 5 m high, placed in the middle and in the walls of the rooms. Most columns contain animal drawings. Studies have suggested that the site had a special function, e.g., as a temple. Following ~ 2 ka of use, the site was deliberately filled in with stones. Because the site is older than the beginning of the agricultural period, it is unclear what civilization constructed such large structures with only hand axes and what the meaning of the figures on the columns is. Here, the Göbeklitepe stone geology is discussed for the first time. We explain how the columns were produced from Early Miocene Fırat Formation limestones, while the filling stones originated from the thinly bedded Eocene Gaziantep Formation. Both formations are Midyat Group marine units that formed on the northern margins of the Arabian platform during the last stages (Eocene-Early Miocene) of the Neotethys. The lateral equivalents of these units are the building stones of several historical sites in Middle Eastern and African countries, like Turkey. The building stones have traditionally been named according to the production localities, i.e., Şanlıurfa Stone, regardless of the geological characteristics. We suggest emphasizing the geological diversity in names to improve the sustainability and reliability of the production and commercial use of natural stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adin H (2007) Mardin ve Midyat’ta kullanılan bina yapı taşlarının bazı fiziksel özellikleri. Mühendis Ve Makine 48(570):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Agan C, Yesilnacar MI, Genis M, Kulaksiz S, Ulusay R, Aydan O, Yucel MD (2013) A preliminary geoengineering assessment of Bazda antique underground quarries in Şanlıurfa, Turkey. The Proceeding book of the ISRM International Symposium: Rock Mechanics for Resources, Energy, and Environment (EUROCK 2013), Wroclaw, Poland, pp 93–98

  • Ağan C, Şit M (2018) Şanlıurfa Taşının bazı mühendislik özellikleri ve iktisadi yönden incelenmesi. Acad Platform J Eng Sci 6(3):145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • AGI (1977) Glossary of geology 4th edition. In: Gary M, McAffe jr RM, CL Wolf (eds). American Geological Institut, Washington DC

  • Andrews JE, Carolin SA, Peckover EN, Marca A, Al-Omari S, Rowe PJ (2020) Holocene stable isotope record of insolation and rapid climate change in a stalagmite from the Zagros of Iran. Quat Sci Rev 241:106433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASGA-UNESCO (1963) Geological map of Africa at scale of 1/5 000 000, Sheet 3, Paris

  • Atashbari V, Tingay M, Amrouch K (2018) Stratigraphy, tectonics and hydrocarbon habitat of the Abadan Plain Basin: a geological review of a prolific Middle Eastern Hydrocarbon Province. Geosciences 2018:496–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aytaç AS, Yetmen H, Şahinalp MS, Benek S, Elmastaş N, Özcanlı M, Şahap A (2016) Harran Üniversitesi Osmanbey kampüsü’nün (Şanlıurfa) fiziki coğrafyası. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 36:473–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Balossi Restelli F (2015) Hearth and home. Interpreting fire installations at Arslantepe, Eastern Turkey, from the fourth to the beginning of the second millennium BCE. Paléorient 41:127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayazıt M (2015) Hasankeyf: a cultural heritage reflecting the history (archaeometric approach). Batman Univ J Life Sci 5(2):73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellopede R, Marini P (2012) The effect of water on the strength of building stones. Am J Environ Sci 8:158–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender B (1978) Gatherer-hunter to farmer: a social perspective. World Archaeol 10:204–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon ESO (2000) Study of deterioration mechanisms and protective treatments for the Egyptian limestone of the Ayyubid city wall of Cairo. MS Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/489. Accessed 2 Oct 2021

  • Bozbay H (2016) Kim, nerede, ne zaman, nasıl ve neden yaptı? Göbekli Tepe. Bilim Ve Gelecek 149:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew G, Barazangi M, Khaled Al-Maleh A, Sawaf T (2001) Tectonic and geologic evolution of Syria. GeoArabia 6(4):573–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çanakcı H, Demirboğa R, Karakoç MB, Şirin O (2007) Thermal conductivity of limestone from Gaziantep (Turkey). Build Environ 42:1777–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolin SA, Walker RT, Day CC, Ersek V, Sloan RA, Dee MW, Talebian M, Henderson GM (2019) Precise timing of abrupt increase in dust activity in the Middle East coincident with 4.2 ka social change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik B (2019) New Neolithic centres in Şanlıurfa similar to Göbeklitepe. In: Uslu ZK (ed) Göbeklitepe; History of humankind is rewritten. Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey and Yıldız Palace Foundation, İstanbul, p 47–62

  • Cherblanc F, Berthonneau J, Bromblet Ph, Huon V (2016) Influence of water content on the mechanical behaviour of limestone; role of the clay minerals content. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2033–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare L, Kinzel M, Sönmez D, Uludağ C (2019a) Göbekli Tepe: UNESCO Dünya Miras Alanı ve Değişen Yaklaşımlar. Mimarlar Odası Mimarlık Dergisi 405:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare L, Yüncü ZT, Uludağ C (2019b) Göbekli Tepe. In: Ertürk N, Karakul Ö (eds) UNESCO World Heritage in Turkey, Published by Turkish National Commission for UNESCO, Ankara, p 523–547

  • Clare L (2019) 25-years of research at Göbeklitepe; a summary of past and recent results. In: Uslu ZK (ed) Göbeklitepe; History of humankind is rewritten. Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Turkey and Yıldız Palace Foundation, İstanbul, p 18–29

  • Cohen KM, Finney SC, Gibbard PL, Fan J-X (2013) updated) The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A (2016) Göbeklitepe ve Tanrıların Doğuşu (Translated by L.T. Basmacı from the original “Göbeklitepe; Genesis of the Gods” Bear & Company Books Pub., Rochester, Vermont, USA, 2014), ALFA yayınları, İstanbul, 517 p

  • Cookson E, Hill DJ, Lawrence D (2019) Impacts of long-term climate change during the collapse of the Akkadian Empire. J Archaeol Sci 106:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkılıç N (2012) The architectural analysis of traditional houses of Midyat- Mardin, Turkey. Int J Acad Res Part A. Nat Appl Sci, Azerbaijan 4/2:10–31

  • Dietrich L, Meister J, Dietrich O, Notroff J, Kiep J, Heeb J, Beuger A, Schütt B (2019) Cereal processing at Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, southeastern Turkey. PLoS One 14(5):0215214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan B, Yavuz AB (2002) Güneydoğu Anadolu’nun Miyosen paleocoğrafyası ve mermer yatakları ilişkisi. DEÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Dergisi 4(2):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Göncüoğlu MC, Kozlu H, Dirik K (1997) Pre-Alpine and Alpine terranes in Turkey: explanatory notes to the terrane map of Turkey. Ann Geol Pays Helleniques 37:515–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Görür N, Akkök R (1984) Facies analysis of the Midyat group (Lower Eocene to Lower Miocene) of the southeast Turkey. A study for the Research Group of Turkish Petroleum Company (TPAO), Report no. 2187, 57 p, Ankara (in Turkish)

  • Güngör-Yeşilova P, Helvacı C (2013) Germik Formasyonu Oligosen evaporitlerinin (Kurtalan, GB, Siirt) diyajenezi ve paleocoğrafik gelişimi, Türkiye. Yerbilimleri 34:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell JA, Storemyr P (2009) Ancient Egyptian quarries—an illustrated overview. In: Abu-Jaber N, Bloxam EG, Degryse P, Heldal T (eds) QuarryScapes: Ancient Stone Quarry Landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean. Geological Survey of Norway Special Publication 12, pp7–50

  • Jotheri J, Altaweel M, Tuji A, Anma R, Pennington B, Rost S, Watanabe C (2018) Holocene fluvial and anthropogenic processes in the region of Uruk in southern Mesopotamia. Quatern Int 483:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahan DS (2018) Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Doğal Taşlar. Maden Tetkik Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Fizibilite Etüdleri Daire Başkanlığı Yayını, Ankara, 37 p

  • Kaya A, Yapıcı N, Anıl M (2008) The study of usage of the Midyat stone as a covering and building material. Ç.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bülteni 19/3, 94–104 (in Turkish)

  • Kazancı N, Gürbüz A (2014) Jeolojik miras nitelikli Türkiye doğal taşları. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 57:19–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm DD, Klemm R (2001) The building stones of ancient Egypt—a gift of its geology. Afr Earth Sci 33:631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knitter D, Braun R, Clare L, Nykamp M, Schütt B (2019) Göbekli Tepe: a brief description of the environmental development in the surroundings of the UNESCO World Heritage Site. Land 8(4):72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulaksiz S, Agan C (2009) Urfa (Harran) Bazda ancient underground marble quarrying. The Proceeding book of the 3rd Balkan Mining Congress (BALKANMINE 2009) Izmir, Turkey, pp 683–689

  • Kuzucuoğlu C, Çiner A, Kazancı N (2019) The geomorphological regions of Turkey. In: Kuzucuoğlu C, Çiner A, Kazancı N (eds)Landscapes and landforms of Turkey, World Series of Geomorphology, Springer, pp 41–178

  • MTA (2007) 1/100 000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları No 67, Mardin N41 Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etüdleri Dairesi, Ankara, 29 p + map

  • MTA (2008) 1:100 000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, no 57, Cizre M49 Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etüdleri Dairesi, Ankara, 42 p + map

  • MTA (2014) 1/100 000 Ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları No 219, Şanlıurfa N47 Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etüdleri Dairesi, Ankara, 13 p + map

  • MTA (2016) Geological map of Turkey at scale of 1/1 000 000. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara

  • Nairn AEM, Alsharhan AS (1997) Sedimentary basins and petroleum geology of the Middle East. Elsevier Pub, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef R (2003) Overlooking the steppe-forest: a preliminary report on the botanical remains from early neolithic Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey). Neo-Lithics 2:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykamp M, Knitter D, Schütt B (2020) Late Holocene geomorphodynamics in the vicinity of Göbekli Tepe, SE Turkey. Catena 195:104759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykamp M, Becker F, Braun R, Pöllath N, Knitter D, Peters J, Schütt B (2020b) Sediment cascades and the entangled relationship between human impact and natural dynamics at the pre-pottery Neolithic site of Göbekli Tepe, Anatolia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Published online in Wiley Online Library https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5035

  • Okay AI, Tüysüz O (1999) Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. In: Durand B, Jolivet L, Horvath E, Seranne M (eds) The Mediterranean basins: tertiary extension within the Alpine Orogen. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 156, 475–515

  • Orland IJ, He F, Bar-Matthews M, Chen G, Ayalon A, Kutzbach JE (2019) Resolving seasonal rainfall changes in the Middle East during the last interglacial period. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(50):24985–24990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton D, Anvari J, Gibson C, Last J, Bogaard A, Rosenstock E, Biehl PF (2018) A tale of two tells: dating the Çatalhöyük west mound. Antiquity 92(363):620–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkaya İ (1974) Güneydoğu Anadolu Sason ve Baykan yöresinin stratigrafisi. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 17:51–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk-Tel H, Sarıışık G (2020) Research on some effective properties in nomination of Urfa Limestone to the “Global Heritage Stone Resource” designation. Arab J Geosci 13:958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perinçek D, Duran O, Bozdoğan N, Çoruh T (1991) Stratigraphy and paleogeographical evolution of the autocthonous sedimentary rocks in the SE Turkey (Güneydoğu Türkiye’de otokton sedimanter kayaların stratigrafisi ve paleocoğrafik evrimi): Ozan Sungurlu Symposium proceedings, Turkish Petroleum Company, Ankara, p 274–305 (in Turkish)

  • Peters J, Schmidt K (2004) Animals in the symbolic world of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey: a preliminary assessment. Anthropozoologica 39:179–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters J, Schmidt K, Dietrich L, Dietrich O, Pöllath N, Kinzel M, Clare L (2019) Göbekli Tepe: Agriculture and Domestication. In: Smith C (ed) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivko D (2003) Natural stones in earth’s history. Acta Geologica 58:73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustovoytov K (2006) Soils and soil sediments at Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey: a preliminary report. Geoarchaeol Int J 21:699–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustovoytov K, Schmidt K, Taubald H (2007) Evidence for Holocene environmental changes in the northern Fertile Crescent provided by pedogenic carbonate coatings. Quat Res 67:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi MR, Mohammadi SD, Taleb Beydokhti AR (2020) Effects of mineral composition and texture on durability of sulfate Rocks in Gachsaran Formation, Iran. Geotech Geol Eng 38:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G, Peace D (2007) Hydrocarbon plays and prospectivity of the Levantine Basin, offshore Lebanon and Syria from modern seismic data. GeoArabia 12(3):99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin G, Balcı-Akova S (2019) Türkiye’nin Coğrafi İşaret Niteliğindeki Jeolojik Değerleri. Asia Minor Studies 7:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin K, Yılmaz A, Günel A (2013) Midyat taşı ve taş işçiliği; doğal ve kültürel çevre ilişkileri. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 6:315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarıışık A, Sarıışık G (2016) Investigation of engineering characteristics of Mardin Stone used in eco-building. Cogent Eng 3:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K (2002) The 2002 excavations at Göbekli Tepe (southeastern Turkey)—impressions from an enigmatic site. Neo-Lithics 2(02):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K (2003) The 2003 campaign at Göbekli Tepe (southeastern Turkey). Neo-Lithics 2(03):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K (2007) Taş Çağı Avcılarının Gizemli Kutsal alanı Göbekli Tepe; En Eski Tapınağı Yapanlar (Translated by Rüstem Aslan from the original “Sie bauten die ersten Tempel. Das rätselhafte Heiligtum der Steinzeitjäger”, published in München 2006”, 2006), Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul, 318 p

  • Schmidt K (2010) Göbekli Tepe- the stone age sanctuaries. New results of ongoing excavations with a special focus on sculptures and high reliefs. Documenta Praehistorica XXXVII:239–255

  • Schmidt K (2011a) Göbekli Tepe: a neolithic site in southeastern Anatolia. In: Steadman S, McMahon G (eds) The Oxford Handbook an Ancient Anatolia (10.000–323. B.C.E.). Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Schmidt K (2011b) Göbeklitepe. In: Özdoğan M, Başgelen N, Kuniholm P (eds) Neolithic in Turkey/Euphrate Basin V.2. Arkeoloji Sanat Publications, İstanbul, pp 85–138

  • Şenel M (2003) Toros Kuşağı Tektonik Birlikleri ve Bunların Korelasyonu. 56. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı Bildiri Özleri, Ankara, p 307–308

  • Sissakian VK, Abdul Ahad AD, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2016) Geology of the archeological hills and monuments, examples from Iraq. J Earth Sci Geotech Eng 6(2):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sütçü YF (2009) Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Diyarbakır N42 Paftası Açınsaması. Maden Tektik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, Ankara

  • Tarhan N, Havzaoğlu T, Beyazpirinç M (2012) Karkamış-Akçakale-Ceylanpınar (Şanlıurfa) dolayının jeolojisi, MTA, Derleme Rapor No 11498, Ankara

  • Taylor K, Mayewski PA, Alley RA, Brook EJ, Gow AJ, Grooten PM, Meese D, Saltzman ES, Severinghaus J, Twickler MS, White JMC, Whitlow S, Zielinski G (1997) The Holocene-Younger Dryas transition recorded at Summit, Greenland. Science 278(5339):825–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgut P, Yesilnacar MI, Bulut H (2008) Physico-thermal and mechanical properties of Şanlıurfa limestone, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Env 67:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkkan A (2011) The stratigraphy of Yavuzeli - Araban area (Gaziantep) and investigation of the of Fırat formation reefal limestones as natural building materials. Ms Thesis, Çukurova University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Geological Engineering, Adana, 71 p

  • Ulu Ü (1996) 1/100 000 Ölçekli Açınsama Nitelikli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları Serisi Urfa K 25 Paftası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etüdleri Dairesi no 42, Ankara, 10 pp

  • Vasarhelyi B (2005) Statistical analysis of the influence of water content on the strength of the Miocene limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Field studies of this project were realized thanks to the logistical support of the Turkish National Commission for UNESCO and Şanlıurfa Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism. Petrographic and mineralogical analyses were completed in Ankara University Geological Engineering Laboratories. Members of Jemirko (Turkish ProGEO group) contributed to the desktop studies and preparation of this paper. Dr. Kıymet Deniz analyzed samples in Raman microscopy, Yaşar Suludere helped for the preparation of Figures 1 and 5, Ms Reetta Saikku read and corrected the text, and the journal reviewers improved significantly the early version of the manuscript. Authors are grateful for all contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nizamettin Kazancı.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Global Heritage Stone Resource: The sustainable way forward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazancı, N., Lopes, Ö.A. Stones of Göbeklitepe, SE Anatolia, Turkey: an Example of the Shaping of Cultural Heritage by Local Geology Since the Early Neolithic. Geoheritage 14, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00694-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00694-9

Keywords

Navigation