Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landslides and Fortified Settlements as Valuable Cultural Geomorphosites and Geoheritage Sites in the Moldavian Plateau, North-Eastern Romania

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 November 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Today, as in the past, people living in hilly and mountainous regions have had to face the consequences of mass movement processes. Archaeological remains are important elements of cultural heritage, which can be significantly affected by landslides in different environmental settings and landscape evolution phases. In the Eastern Carpathians lowlands, landslides have shaped a landscape with inaccessible escarpments tens of metres high, providing ancient populations with naturally defensive sites at which to build their fortified settlements. In this study, we present a unique geoarchaeological context, the case of Chalcolithic and Thraco-Getic (6.5 ka BP to 2500 BP) fortified settlements, for which landslides provided a favorable geomorphologic setting for their construction. At the same time, however, landslides reamin as a permanent threat to the archaeological sites. In the Moldavian Plateau, North-Eastern Romania, more than 35 sites were identified on structural plateaus bounded by wide scarps of Pleistocene to Lower Holocene landslides, on cuesta ridges bounded by scarps of Holocene landslides, or situated on hillslopes, on erosional remnants of very old landslide bodies. For nine out of the 35 sites, we discuss and evaluate the geomorphosite status according to an indirect method developed by mixing a variety of methodologies illustrated in the literature, and we classify them as geomorphosites and specifically as cultural geomorphosites. The complex geomorphological, paleogeographical, and archaeological value of these proposed geosites allow us to argue for their geoheritage status. This situation requires a detailed analysis of landslide hazard and risk for these sites, since some have already been affected by landslides in the past, and especially when considering possible protection measures and actions to preserve and to include these geoheritage sites in the geotouristic networks of North-Eastern Romania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 November 2017

    The original version of this article contained a mistake. The authors’ first name and last name were interchanged.

References

  • Alcántara-Ayala I (2009) Geomorphosite management in areas sensitive to natural hazards. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisci C, Dramis F (1991) Il concetto di attività in geomorphologia (the concept of activity in geomorphology). Geogr Fis Din Quat 14(2):193–199 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghian D, Enea SC, Pîrnău RD, Secu C (2014) Elemente de Landscape Archaeology în zona siturilor Costești-Cier și Giurgești-Dealul Mănăstirii, jud. Iași (Elements of landscape archaeology in the area of Costești-Cier and Giurgești - Dealul Mănăstirii sites, Iași county). In: ArheoVest II2 - In honorem Gheorghe Lazarovici - Interdisciplinaritate în Arheologie. JATEPress Kiadó, Szeged, pp 571–611 (in Romanian)

  • Bollati I, Pelfini M, Pellegrini L (2012) A geomorphosites selection method for educational purpose: a case study in Trebbia Valley (Emilia Romagna, Italy). Geogr Fis Din Quat 35:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonachea J, Bruschi VM, Remondo J, González-Díez A, Salas L, Bertens J, Cendrero A, Otero C, Giusti C, Fabbri A, González-Lastra JR, Aramburu JM (2005) An approach for the incorporation of geomorphologic factors into EIA of transportation infrastructures; a case study in northern Spain. Geomorphology 66:95–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti L, Tosatti G (2010) Slope instability processes affecting the Pietra di Bismantova Geosite (northern Apennines, Italy). Geoheritage 2(3):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0023-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boukhchim N, Ben Fraj T, Reynard E (2017) Lateral and “Vertico-lateral” cave dwellings in Haddej and Guermessa: characteristic geocultural heritage of Southeast Tunisia. Geoheritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0251-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromhead EN, Canuti P, Ibsen ML (2006) Landslides and cultural heritage. Landslides 3(4):273–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0062-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario 18(1):293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2009) Direct parametric methods for the assessment of geosites and geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil Verlag, München, pp 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A, Cuesta Albertos JA (2011) A statistical approach to the validation and optimization of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage 3:131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budimir MEA, Atkinson PM, Lewis HG (2014) Earthquake-and-landslide events are associated with more fatalities than earthquakes alone. Nat Hazards 72(2):895–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1044-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canuti P, Casagli N, Catani F, Fanti R (2000) Hydrogeological hazard and risk in archaeological sites: some case studies in Italy. J Cult Herit 1(2):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(00)00158-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canuti P, Margottini C, Mucho R, Casagli N, Delmonaco G, Ferretti A, Lollino G, Puglisi C, Tarchi D (2005) Preliminary results on monitoring geomorphological evolution and slope stability of Inca citadel of Machu Picchu (C101-1). In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Landslides: risk analysis and sustainable disaster management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28680-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Canuti P, Margottini C, Fanti R, Bromhead E (2009) Cultural heritage and landslides: research for risk prevention and conservation. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides—disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cayla N, Hoblea F, Biot V, Delamette M, Guyomard A (2012) De l’invisibilité des géomorphosites à la revelation géopatrimoniale. Géocarrefour 87(3–4):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Lu Y, Ng YCY (2015) The principles of geotourism. Springer Geography, Springer, Berlin, p 264

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chirica V, Tanasachi M (1984) Repertoriul arheologic al județului Iași, vol. 1–2 (Archaeological repertoire of Iaşi county), Institutul de Istorie și Arheologie “A.D. Xenopol”, Ed. Universității “Al. I. Cuza” Iași, Iași-Bucureşti, p 553 (in Romanian)

  • Chrobak A, Cebulski J (2014) Landslide in the Polish Carpathians as the potential educational Geosites. Curr Issue Tour Res 4(1):38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinovschi F, Roşu PC, Palaghianu C (2007) Specii lemnoase utilizate la împădurirea terenurilor degradate din silvostepa nordică a Moldovei. Studiu de caz (Trees species used for reforestation of degraded lands in the northern silvostepe of Moldavia. Study case), Annals of “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava 2:5–12

  • Clivaz M, Reynard E (2017) How to integrate invisible geomorphosites in an inventory: a case study in the Rhone River Valley (Switzerland). Geoheritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2017) Geomorphosites assessments of the glacial and periglacial landforms from Southern Carpathians. In: Rădoane M, Vespremeanu-Stroe A (eds) Landform dynamics and evolution in Romania. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P (2004) Géomorphologie et culture. Exemples de valorisation en Emilie Romagne (Italie). In: Reynard E, Pralong JP (eds) Paysages géomorphologiques, Institut de Géographie, Lausanne, Travaux et Recherches 27, pp 209–223

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, De Waele J (2012) Geomorphosites and natural hazards: teaching the importance of geomorphology in society. Geoheritage 4:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0058-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Bruschi VM, Piacenitini D, Saliba D, Soldati M (2011) Recognition and assessment of geomorphosites in Malta at the Il-Majjistral nature and history park. Geoheritage 3:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0034-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) landslides investigation and mitigation, transportation research board, US National Council, special report 247, Washington, DC, Chapter 3:36–75

  • Del Monte M, Fredi P, Pica A, Vergari F (2013) Geosites within Rome City center (Italy): a mixture of cultural and geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Din Quat 36:241–257. https://doi.org/10.4461/GFDQ.2013.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitroaia G (2000) Comunităţi preistorice din nord-estul României – de la cultura Cucuteni până la bronzul mijlociu (Prehistoric communities from Northeast Romania – from Cucuteni Culture to the Bronze Age). Muzeul de Istorie Piatra Neamţ, Piatra Neamt, p 336 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard R (2007) Pattern and process: towards a regional approach to national estate assessment of geodiversity. Technical series no. 2, Australian heritage commission and environment forest taskforce, Australia, Canberra

  • Fines KD (1968) Landscape evaluation: a research project in east Sussex. Reg Stud 2(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florescu AC (1966) Observaţii asupra sistemului de fortificare ale aşezărilor cucuteniene din Moldova (Observations on the fortification system of Cucuteni and settlements from Moldavia). Arheol Mold 4:23–27 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florescu AC (1971) Unele consideraţiuni asupra cetăţilor traco-getice (hallstattiene) din mileniul I î.e.n. de pe teritoriul Moldovei (Some considerations regarding the Thraco-Getic (Hallstatt) fortresses from first millenium before our era from Moldavia). Cercetări Istorice 2:103–118 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florescu AC, Melinte I (1968) Cetatea traco-getică din a doua jumătate a mil. II î.e.n., de la Moşna (jud. Iaşi) (The Thraco-Getic fortress from the second half of the 2nd millenium before our era from Moşna). SCIV 19(1):129–134 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florescu AC, Florescu M (2012) Cetățile traco-getice din secolele VI-III A. Chr. de la Stâncești (jud. Botoșani) (The Thraco-Getic fortresses of 6th-3rd centuries before Christ from Stâncești, Botoșani county). Editura Cetatea de Scaun, Târgoviște, p 181 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florescu M (1994) Cotnari - Cătălina. Cronica cercetărilor arheologice din România, 1983–2012 (Cotnari - Cătălina. The chronic of archaeologic research from Romania. Research report). Raport de cercetare. http://cronica.cimec.ro/detaliu.asp?k=96 (in Romanian). Accessed 30.10.2016

  • Fouache E, Rasse M (2009) Archaeology, geoarchaeology and geomorphosite management: towards a typology of geoarchaeosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 213–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouache E, Ecochard E, Kuzucuoglu C, Carcaud N, Ekmekci M, Ulusoy I, Ciner A, De Courtils J (2012) Palaeogeographical reconstruction and management challenges of an archaeological site listed by UNESCO: the case of the Letoon Shrine in the Xanthos plain (Turkey). Quaestiones Geographicae 31(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0002-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsema M, Pojar JJ (2007) The influence of landslides on biophysical diversity—a perspective from British Columbia. Geomorphology 89(1–2):55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsema M, Highland L, Vaugeouis L (2009) Environmental impact of landslides. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides—disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A, Viles H (2010) Landscapes and geomorphology: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 152

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grandgirard V (1997) Géomorphologie, protection de la nature et gestion du paysage. Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université de Fribourg, p 210 (in French)

  • Grandgirard V (1999) L’évaluation des géotopes. Geologica Insubrica 4(1):59–66 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11:167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionesi L, Ionesi B, Roșca L, Lungu A, Ionesi V (2005) Sarmațianul mediu și superior de pe Platforma Moldovenească (The medium and upper Sarmatian from Moldavian Platform). Editura Academiei Române, București, p 559 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiden P, Denys L, Verbruggen C, Paulissen E, Langohr R (1991) Earth science conservation and the quaternary record in northern and middle Belgium. Bull Soc Belge Géologie 100(3–4):313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan K (2015) Landforms as sacred places: implications for geodiversity and geoheritage. Geoheritage 7:177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0128-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum DB, Adler R, Hong Y, Lerner-Lam A (2009) Evaluation of a preliminary satellite-based landslide hazard algorithm using global landslide inventories. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(3):673–686. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-673-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjekstad O, Highland L (2009) Economic and social impact of landslides. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides—disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, pp 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Komac B, Zorn M, Erhartič B (2011) Loss of natural heritage from the geomorphological perspective—do geomorphic processes shape or destroy the natural heritage. Acta Geogr Slov 51(2):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacasse S, Nadim F (2009) Landslide risk assessment and mitigation strategy. In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Landslides: risk analysis and sustainable disaster management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Marchand MO’B (1968) On the quantitative inventory of the riverscape. Water Resour Res 4(4):710–717. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR004i004p00709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1969a) Landscape esthetics: how to quantify the aesthetics of a river valley. Nat Hist 78(8):36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1969b) Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers. Circ 620, US Geol Surv, Washington, DC, pp 1–14

  • Linton DL (1968) The assessment of scenery as a natural resource. Scott Geogr Mag 84:218–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugeri FR, Amadio V, Bagnaia R, Cardilo A, Lugeri N (2011) Landscapes and wine production areas: a geomorphological heritage. Geoheritage 2:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0035-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mărgărint MC, Niculiţă M (2017) Landslide type and pattern in Moldavian Plateau, NE Romania. In: Rădoane M, Vespremeanu-Stroe A (eds), Landform dynamics and evolution in Romania, Springer Geography, Springer Cham, pp 271–304 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_12

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlan V (2013) Săpături arheologice în cetatea getică de la Moşna, jud. Iaşi (Archaeological diggings in the Getic fortress from Moşna, Iaşi County). Prutul, Revistă de Cultură, Huşi 3(12):6–11. (in Romanian)

  • Nadim F, Jaedicke C, Smebye H, Kalsnes B (2013) Assessment of global landslide hazard hotspots. In: Sassa K, Rouhban B, Briceño S, McSaveney M, He B (eds) Landslides: global risk preparedness. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22087-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Natura 2000 Network Viewer, http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/, Accessed 30.10.2016

  • Newsome D, Dowling R (2006) The scope and nature of geotourism. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nicu IC (2017) Frequency ratio and GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility applied to cultural heritage assessment. J Cult Herit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niculiţă M (2011) A landform classification schema for structural landforms of the Moldavian platform (Romania). In: Hengl T, Evans IS, Wilson JP, Gould M (eds) Geomorphometry, Redlands, pp 129–132. http://geomorphometry.org/system/files/Niculita2011geomorphometry.pdf Accessed 30.10.2016

  • Niculiță M, Mărgărint MC (2014) Landslide inventory for the Moldavian Plateau. In: Proceedings of International Conference Analysis and Management of Changing Risks for Natural Hazards, 18–19 Nov 2014, Padua, Italy. http://www.changes-itn.eu/Portals/0/Content/2014/Final%20conference/abstracts/AP3_Abstract_Niculita.pdf, p 10

  • Niculiță M, Mărgărint MC, Santangelo M (2016b) Archaeological evidence for Holocene landslide activity in the eastern Carpathian lowland. Quat Int 415:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niculiță M, Bucci F, Mărgărint MC, Santangelo M (2016a) Landslides and fortified settlements as valuable geoheritage sites in the Moldavian plateau, North-Eastern Romania, Geophysical Research Abstracts 18: EGU2016–11348

  • Obreja A (1957) Observațiuni geomorfologice asupra teraselor Jijiei (Geomorphological observations on Jijia terraces). Analele Științifice ale Universității “Al. I. Cuza” din Iași (serie nouă), Secțiunea II, 3(1–2):1–11. (in Romanian)

  • Palacio-Prieto JL (2015) Geoheritage within cities: urban geosites in Mexico City. Geoheritage 7:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0136-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio-Prieto JL, Rosado-González E, Ramírez-Miguel X, Oropeza-Orozco O, Cram-Heydrich S, Ortiz-Pérez MA, Figueroa-Mah-Eng JM, Fernández de Castro-Martínez G (2016) Erosion, culture and geoheritage; the case of Santo Domingo Yanhuitlán, Oaxaca, México. Geoheritage 8:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0175-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (1993) Geomorphological assets evaluation. Z Geomorphol Supp 87:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2003) Geomorfologia culturale. Pitagora, Bologna, p 350 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2004) Pour une géomorphologie culturelle. In: Reynard E, Pralong JP (eds) Paysages géomorphologiques, Institut de Géographie, Lausanne, Travaux et Recherches 27, pp 193–207 (in French)

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2005) Geomorphosites: a bridge between scientific research, cultural integration and artistic suggestion. Il Quaternario 18(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2009) Cultural geomorphology and geodiversity. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Păunescu A, Şadurschi P, Chirica V (1976) Repertoriul arheologic al judeţului Botoşani (Archaeological repertoire of Botoşani county). vol 1. Academia de Ştiinţe Sociale şi Politice a Republicii Socialiste România, Bucureşti, p 391 (in Romanian)

  • Patrimoniul Istoric şi Arhitectural Iaşi, Romania, Arheologie (2008) http://www.monumenteiasi.ro/

  • Pelfini M, Bollati I (2014) Landforms and geomorphosites ongoing changes: concepts and implications for geoheritage promotion. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(1):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie 16(2):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica 62(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu-Dâmbovița M, Florescu M, Florescu AC (1999) Trușești. Monografie arheologică (Trușești. Archaeological monography). Editura Academiei Române, București-Iași, p 812 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu-Dâmbovița M, Văleanu M (2004) Cucuteni-Cetăţuie. Săpăturile din anii 1961–1966. Monografie arheologică (Cucuteni-Cetăţuie. The diggings from 1961 to 1966. Archaeological Monography). Muzeul de Istorie şi Arheologie Piatra Neamţ, Piatra Neamţ, p 405 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica A, Vergari F, Fredi P, Del Monte M (2016) The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage 8(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie 3:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser C, Murphy M, Larwood J (2006) Geological conservation: a guide to good practice. English Nature, Peterborough, pp 1–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2004a) Geosites. In: Goudie A (ed) Encyclopedia of geomorphology. Routledge, London, p 440

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2004b) Géotopes, géo(morpho)sites et paysages géomorphologiques. Institut de geographie, Travaux et Recherches, Lausanne 27, pp 124–136 (in French)

  • Reynard E (2004c) La géomorphologie et la création des paysages. In: Reynard E, Pralong JP (eds) Paysages géomorphologiques, Institut de Géographie, vol 27. Travaux et Recherches, Lausanne, pp 9–20 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2005a) Geomorphological sites, public policies and property rights. Conceptualization and examples from Switzerland. Il. Quaternario 18(1):323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2005b) Géomorphosites et paysages. Géomorphologie 11(3):181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2009) Geomorphosites and landscapes. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Panizza M (2005) Geomorphosites: definition, assessment and mapping. Géomorphologie 11(3):177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Giusti C (2017) The landscape and the cultural value of geoheritage. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritate: assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fonatan G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62(3):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanian Archaeological Repertoire (n.d.) http://ran.cimec.ro, Accessed 30.10.2016

  • Romanian Historical Monument List (n.d.) http://cultura.ro/page/17, Accessed 30.10.2016

  • Șadurschi P, Șovan OL (1986) Cetatea getică de la Cotu-Copălău (The Getic fortress from Cotu-Copălău). Hierasus 6:33–39. (in Romanian)

  • Sharples C (2002) Concept and principles of geoconservation, PDF Document, Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service, p 79, www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nfs/webpages/SJON-57W4FD Accessed 10.10.2015

  • Șovan OL, Ignat M (2005) Așezarea getică fortificată de la Cotu-Copălău (The fortified Getic settlement from Cotu-Copălău). Editura Cetatea de Scaun, Târgoviște, p 113 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace H, Larwood JG (2006) Natural foundations: geodiversity for people, places and nature. English Nature, Peterborough, p 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Văleanu MC (2003a) Aşezări neo-eneolitice din Moldova (neo and eneolithic settlements from Moldavia). Editura Helios, Iaşi, p 234 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Văleanu MC (2003b) Omul şi mediul natural în neo-eneoliticul din Moldova (The man and his environment in neo and eneolithic from Moldavia), p 286 Editura Helios, Iaşi (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Eeckhaut M, Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, Van Gils M, Van Rompaey A (2010) Human-environment interactions in residential areas susceptible to landsliding: the Flemish Ardennes case study. Area 42(3):339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00919.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G (2015) Geoheritage features in Xi’an, China: Cuihua rock avalanche likely originating from an ancient earthquake. Geoheritage 7(3):285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0132-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson E, Slaymaker O (1966) Mid-Wales, a survey of geomorphological sites. Department of Geography, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, p 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1996) Geosites—a new conservation initiative. Episodes 19:87–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP (1999) Geosites—an International Union of Geological Sciences initiative to conserve our geological heritage. Polish Geol Inst Spec Pap 2:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharia N, Petrescu-Dâmboviţa M, Zaharia E (1970) Aşezări din Moldova: de la paleolitic până în secolul al XVIII-lea (Settlements from Moldavia: from Paleolithic to the 18th century). Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucureşti, p 663 (in Romanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbenovich VG (1996) The Tripolye culture: centenary of research. J World Prehist 10:199–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Geography Department, Geography and Geology Faculty, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi. We are grateful to Prut-Bârlad Water Administration who provided us with the LIDAR data. We thank E. Reynard and to other two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript. We have used the computational facilities given by the infrastructure provided through the POSCCE-O 2.2.1, SMIS-CSNR 13984-901, No. 257/28.09.2010 Project, CERNSIM (L4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography Department, Geography and Geology Faculty, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Carol I, 20A, 700505, Iaşi, Romania

    Mihai Niculiţă & Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint

Authors
  1. Mihai Niculiţă
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihai Niculiţă.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The authors’ first name and last name were interchanged. The correct author names are given above. Also, there was a typo in Table 6 at row 3 column 5 were instead of 0.00 we changed to 0.42. The GT on that row was also changed to 0.37.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niculiţă, M., Mărgărint, M.C. Landslides and Fortified Settlements as Valuable Cultural Geomorphosites and Geoheritage Sites in the Moldavian Plateau, North-Eastern Romania. Geoheritage 10, 613–634 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0261-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0261-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation