Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geomorphosites Assessment in Karst Terrains: Anina Karst Region (Banat Mountains, Romania)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the assessment of geomorphosites for one of the most important karst regions in Romania, where geomorphological features represent the main touristic attractions due to their density and due to their representativeness for the study area. We used the Pralong method for geomorphosites assessment in the Anina karst region (Banat Mountains). Many geomorphological sites, such as karst springs, caves, gorges and karst plateaus with a high density of karst features, are situated in the study area, sites that will be evaluated as geomorphosites in this article. The present study is important in public awareness of the role of natural features in local development, drawing attention to the local authorities and to the general public regarding the role of geomorphological features in tourism development. For the Anina karst region, it is important that these geomorphosites are appropriately exploited in order to protect the karst landscape, because many studies consider it more important to protect and conserve the geomorphosites, rather than using this geomorphological heritage as a touristic direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bâca I (2011) The Băile Figa geosite (Bistriţa-Năsăud County) geomorpho-cultural assessment and tourism valorization, Analele Ştiintifice Ale Universităţii „Al I. Cuza” Iaşi, Tom LVII, s. II – c, Geografie, 69–78

  • Bucur II (1997) Formaţiunile mezozoice din zona Reşiţa-Moldova Nouă (Munţii Aninei şi estul Munţilor Locvei). Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, 214 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigna AA (1993) Environmental management of tourist caves. Environ Geol 21(3):173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Dobre R (2009) Inventorying, evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of The Ceahlău National Park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 3(1):86–96, Year II

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2010) Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: between scientific evaluation and tourist perception. Area 42(4):406–416. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2012) The evaluation of geomorphosites from the Ponoare Protected Area. Forum Geografic, Studii și Cercetări de Geografie și Protecția Mediului XI(1):54–61. doi:10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2012.037.i

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2013) The geotouristic map—between theory and practical use. Case study the central sector of the Bucegi Mountains (Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 11(1):16–22, Year VI

  • Coratza P, Bruschi VM, Piacentini D, Saliba D, Soldati M (2011) Recognition and assessment of geomorphosites in Malta at the Il-Majjistral nature and history park. Geoheritage 3(3):175–185. doi:10.1007/s12371-011-0034-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Galve JP, Soldati M, Tonelli C (2012) Recognition and assessment of sinkholes as geosites: lessons from the Island of Gozo (Malta). Quaestiones Geographicae 31(1):25–35. doi:10.2478/v10117-012-0006-8

  • Erhartič B (2010) Geomorphosite assessment. Acta Geogr Slovenica 50–2:295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuillet T, Sourp E (2011) Geomorphological heritage of the Pyrenees National Park (France): assessment, clustering, and promotion of geomorphosites. Geoheritage 3:151–162. doi:10.1007/s12371-010-0020-y

  • Gavrilă IG, Anghel T (2013) Geomorphosites inventory in the Măcin Mountains (South-Eastern Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 11(1):42–53, Year VI

  • Hoyos M, Soler V, Canaveras JC, Sánchez-Moral S, Sanz-Rubio E (1998) Microclimatic characterization of a karst cave: human impact on microenvironmental parameters of a prehistoric rock art cave (Candamo Cave, northern Spain). Environ Geol 33(4):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilieș DC, Josan N (2007) Preliminary contribution to the investigation of the geosites from Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Revista de Geomorfologie 9:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Komac B, Zorn M, Erhartič B (2011) Loss of natural heritage from the geomorphological perspective—do geomorphic processes shape or destroy the natural heritage? Acta Geogr Slovenica 51–2:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tour 2(2):80–104. doi:10.2478/cjot-2013-0005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2015) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: a case study from Vizovická Vrchovina highland (eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage. doi:10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateescu F (1961) Influențe structurale în relieful Munților Carașului. Probleme de geografie, vol VIII. Institutul de Geologie și Geografie, București, pp 205–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Miccadei E, Sammarone L, Piacentini T, D’Amico D, Mancinelli V (2014) Geotourism in the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Central Italy): the example of Mount Greco and Chiarano Valley. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 13(1):38–51, Year VII

    Google Scholar 

  • Necheș I-M (2013) From geomorphosite evaluation to geotourism interpretation. Case study: the Sphinx of Romania’s Southern Carpathians. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites 12(2):145–162, Year VI

  • Orășeanu I, Iurkiewicz A (2010) Karst hydrogeology of Romania, Ed. Fed. Română de Speologie, Oradea

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46(Supp.):4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2009) The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1:33–42. doi:10.1007/s12371-009-0003-z

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2008) Geomorphosites and geotourism. Rev Geogr Acad 2(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 2:215–222

  • Popa ME, Meller B (2009) Review of Jurassic plants from the anina (Steierdorf) coal mining area, South Carpathians, in the collections of the geological survey of Austria. Jb Geol Bundesanst 149(4):487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Popa ME, Kedzior A, Fodolică V (2010) The Anina geopark: preserving the geological heritage of the South Carpathians. Rev Roum Géol 53–54:109–113

  • Pralong J-P (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphol: Relief Processus Environ 3:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralong J-P, Reynard E (2005) A proposal for a classification of geomorphological sites depending on their tourist value. Il Quaternario Italian J Quat Sci 18(1):315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Răileanu Gr, Năstăseanu S, Boldur C (1964) Sedimentarul paleozoic și mezozoic al Domeniului getic din partea sudvestică a Carpaților Meridionali, Anuarul Comitetului Geologic, XXXIV, București, 5–58

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 3:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sencu V (1963) Cercetǎri asupra carstului din jurul localităţii Anina (Banat) – Peşterile din bazinele pâraielor Anina şi Buhui - Probleme de Geografie. vol. X, 156–177.

  • Sencu V (1964) Cercetări asupra carstului din partea sudică a localității Anina (Banat). Peșterile din bazinele pâraielor Steierdorf și Ponor. Studii și Cercetări de Geologie, Geofizică și Geografie 11:140–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Sencu V (1977) Carstul din câmpul minier Anina. St. Cerc. de Geol., Geofizică, Geografie, XXIV, 2, 199–212

  • Sencu V (1978) Munţii Aninei. Editura Sport-Turism, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphol: Relief Processus Environ 3:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toma B, Irimuș IA, Danci I, Vieru I, Neagu L (2010) Saliferous geomorphosites from East-Transylvania diapire folds and their touristic value, Paper presented at the 2nd Edition of the International Conference “The Role of Tourism in Territorial Development”

  • Warowna J, Migoń P, Gawrysiak R-K, Kiebała A, Zgłobicki W (2013) Geomorphosites of Poland—the role played by the central register of geosites. Landform Anal 22:117–124. doi:10.12657/landfana.022.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgłobicki W, Baran-Zgłobicka B (2013) Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. A case study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 5:137–149. doi:10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks to the anonymous reviewers for his valuable comments on the previous versions of this paper.

This work has been supported from the strategic grant POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133391, Project ‘Doctoral and Postdoctoral programs of excellence for highly qualified human resources training for research in the field of Life sciences, Environment and Earth Science’ co-financed by the European Social Fund within the Sectorial Operational Program Human Resources Development 2007–2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurențiu Artugyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Artugyan, L. Geomorphosites Assessment in Karst Terrains: Anina Karst Region (Banat Mountains, Romania). Geoheritage 9, 153–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0188-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0188-x

Keywords

Navigation