Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Sugarcane Plant–Ratoon Productivity Through Bud Chip Transplanting Geometry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for three consecutive seasons on sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) plant–ratoon system (2013–2016) at Sugarcane Research Institute, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Bihar, to study the effect of planting distance and row spacing on productivity of sugarcane planted with bud chip raised settlings by furrow-irrigated raised bed method of planting. The results revealed that growth and yield attributes, viz. leaf area index, drymatter accumulation, plant population, plant height, net assimilation rate, cane diameter and millable canes, were significantly influenced due to planting distance and row spacing. The mean higher cane yield (81.7 and 74.6 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops was obtained at 30 cm planting distance. Though the differences between 30 and 45 cm planting distance were not significant, the higher benefit/cost ratio was obtained at 45 cm planting distance. Among row spacing, planting at 90 cm row spacing showed the highest drymatter accumulation (30.6 and 28.1 t/ha), millable canes (102,000 and 116,300/ha), net returns (Rs. 137,700 and 140,600/ha) and benefit/cost ratio (1.67 and 2.40) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively. Planting of bud chip raised settlings at 90 cm row spacing significantly increased the yield of plant and ratoon canes during all the years of experimentation as well as on mean basis. Sucrose content juice was not affected by planting distance and row spacing. Correlation studies between cane yield and sucrose content with different growth and yield parameters of sugarcane plant and ratoon crops indicated that the yield of sugarcane was significantly and positively correlated with most of the growth and yield parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chakrawal, D., and N. Kumar. 2014. Response of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) varieties to various planting geometry. Indian Journal of Agronomy 59 (2): 341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, M., A. Khippal, S. Singh, R. Lal, and R. Singh. 2011. Effect of planting material and seed rate in pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) in sub-tropical India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56 (1): 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, H., F. Munsif, A. Ali, I. Muhammad, N. Haque, and M. Shahid. 2015. Evaluation of chip bud settling of sugarcane for enhancing yield to various row spacing. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research 1 (2): 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendranath, M. 1992. Cost-effectiveness of transplanting nursery- raised sugarcane bud-chip plants on commercial sugar plantations. Proceedings of ISSCT Congress 21: 332–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, D.D., C.L. Patel, and G.B. Kalaria. 2006. Effect of planting geometry and weed management on quality and yield of sugarcane. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 21 (1&2): 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawar, M.W., D.B. More, V.T. Amodkar, and S. Joshi. 2005. Effect of intersettling spacing on sugarcane yield and quality. Sugar Tech 7 (1): 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, R.N., and T.V. Sreenivasan. 1996. Developing technology for sugarcane varietal exchange through bud chips. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 11: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskar, B.S., and P.G. Bhoi. 2005. Drymatter accumulation and yield performance of pre-seasonal sugarcane Co 86032 with intra-row spacings, fertilizer levels and planting materials. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural University 30 (2): 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant, T.K. 2017. Bud chip method: A potential technology for sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) cultivation. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 5 (3): 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., W. Singh, and A. Choudhary. 2014. Nursery raising with high density sugarcane transplanting. Indian Farming 64 (1): 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, G.L., and G.P. Meade. 1955. Cane sugar hand book. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulistiono, W., Taryono, P. Yudono, and Irham. 2017. Growth analysis of transplanted sugarcane bud chips seedling in the dryland. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research 6 (1): 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navnit Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, N. Enhancing Sugarcane Plant–Ratoon Productivity Through Bud Chip Transplanting Geometry. Sugar Tech 22, 208–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00772-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00772-3

Keywords

Navigation