Abstract
This paper presents a centralized production-inventory model for an infinite planning horizon of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting a retailer, manufacturer, and remanufacturer. The demand at the retailer is satisfied through the new and remanufactured products received from the manufacturer and remanufacturer, respectively. The proposed model considers demand at the retailer and return at the remanufacturer as random. The manufacturer and remanufacturer produce the products at a finite rate, and they deliver to the retailer alternatively in multiple batches. An algorithm is developed to find the optimal-lot sizing and shipment policies of each entity of the CLSC by minimizing the expected joint total cost of the system. The results show that the CLSC is more profitable than the forward supply chain when the remanufacturing cost of the returned product is significantly low compared to the manufacturing cost of the new product, the demand variation at the retailer is low, and the fraction of demand returned is close to 1.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atasu A, Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2008) Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research. Prod Oper Manag 17(5):483–496
Chung SL, Wee HM, Yang PC (2008) Optimal policy for a closed-loop supply chain inventory system with remanufacturing. Math Comput Model 48(5–6):867–881
Dobos I, Richter K (2004) An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates. Int J Prod Econ 90(3):311–323
Dobos I, Richter K (2006) A production/recycling model with quality consideration. Int J Prod Econ 104(2):571–579
El Saadany AMA, Jaber MY (2008) The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):219–233
El Saadany AMA, Jaber MY (2010) A production/remanufacturing inventory model with price and quality dependant return rate. Comput Ind Eng 58(3):352–362
Giri BC, Sharma S (2015) Optimizing a closed-loop supply chain with manufacturing defects and quality dependent return rate. J Manuf Syst 35:92–111
Giri BC, Sharma S (2016) Optimal production policy for a closed-loop hybrid system with uncertain demand and return under supply disruption. J Clean Prod 112:2015–2028
Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res 57(1):10–18
Guide VDR Jr, Teunter RH, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Matching demand and supply to maximize products from remanufacturing. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 5(4):303–316
Hariga M, As’ad R, Khan Z (2017) Manufacturing-remanufacturing policies for a centralized two stage supply chain under consignment stock partnership. Int J Prod Econ 183(1):362–374
Hasanov P, Jaber MY, Zolfaghari S (2012) Production, remanufacturing and waste disposal models for the cases of pure and partial backordering. Appl Math Model 36(11):5249–5261
Jaber MY, El Saadany AMA (2009) The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):115–124
Jaber MY, El Saadany AMA (2011) An economic production and remanufacturing model with learning effects. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):115–127
Jaber MY, Zanoni S, Zavanella LE (2014) A consignment stock coordination scheme for the production, remanufacturing and waste disposal problem. Int J Prod Res 52(1):50–65
Jorjani S, Leu J, Scott C (2004) Model for the allocation of electronics components to reuse options. Int J Prod Res 42(6):1131–1145
Koh SG, Hwang H, Sohn KI, Ko CS (2002) An optimal ordering and recovery policy for reusable items. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):59–73
Konstantaras I, Skouri K (2010) Lot sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):326–335
Konstantaras I, Skouri K, Jaber MY (2010) Lot sizing for a recoverable product with inspection and sorting. Comput Ind Eng 58(3):452–462
Korugan A, Gupta S (1998) A multi-echelon inventory system with returns. Comput Ind Eng 35(98):145–148
Lee W (2005) A joint economic lot size model for raw material ordering, manufacturing setup, and finished goods delivering. Omega 33(2):163–174
Lin HC (2015) Two-echelon stochastic inventory system with returns and partial backlogging. Int J Syst Sci 46(6):966–975
Lund RT (1996) The remanufacturing industry: hidden giant. Boston University. http://www.bu.edu/reman/GetReports.htm. Accessed 25 June 2013
Mabini M, Pintelon L, Gelders L (1992) EOQ type formulations for controlling repairable inventories. Int J Prod Econ 28(1):21–33
Maiti T, Giri BC (2017) Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand. Int J Prod Econ 183(1):259–272
Mawandiya BK, Jha JK, Thakkar J (2016) Two-echelon closed-loop supply chain deterministic inventory models in a batch production environment. Int J Sustain Eng 9(5):315–328
Mawandiya BK, Jha JK, Thakkar J (2017) Production-inventory model for two-echelon closed-loop supply chain with finite manufacturing and remanufacturing rates. Int J Syst Sci Oper Logist 4(3):199–218
Mitra S (2009) Analysis of a two-echelon inventory system with returns. Omega 37(1):106–115
Mitra S (2012) Inventory management in a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain with correlated demands and returns. Comput Ind Eng 62(4):870–879
Muckstadt JA, Isaac MH (1981) An analysis of single item inventory systems with returns. Nav Res Logist Q 28(2):237–254
Nahmias S, Rivera H (1979) A deterministic model for a repairable item inventory system with a finite repair rate. Int J Prod Res 17(3):215–221
Priyan S, Uthayakumar R (2015) Two-echelon multi-product multi-constraint product returns inventory model with permissible delay in payments and variable lead time. J Manuf Syst 36:244–262
Ravindran A, Phillips DT, Solberg JJ (2010) Oper Res Princ Pract. Wiley, India
Richter K (1996a) The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers. Eur J Oper Res 95(2):313–324
Richter K (1996b) The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model. Int J Prod Econ 45(1–3):443–447
Richter K (1997) Pure and mixed strategies for the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem. OR Spektrum 19(2):123–129
Richter K, Dobos I (1999) Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers. Int J Prod Econ 59(1–3):463–467
Savaskan RC, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Reverse channel design: the case of competing retailers. Manag Sci 52(1):1–14
Schrady DA (1967) A deterministic inventory model for reparable items. Nav Res Logist 14(3):391–398
Schulz T, Voigt G (2014) A flexibly structured lot sizing heuristic for a static remanufacturing system. Omega 44(1):21–31
Shi J, Zhang G, Sha J (2011) Optimal production planning for a multi-product closed loop system with uncertain demand and return. Comput Oper Res 38(3):641–650
Tai AH, Ching WK (2014) Optimal inventory policy for a Markovian two echelon system with returns and lateral transhipment. Int J Prod Econ 151:48–55
Teng HM, Hsu PH, Chiu Y, Wee HM (2011) Optimal ordering decisions with returns and excess inventory. Appl Math Comput 217(22):9009–9018
Teunter RH (2001) Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory systems. Nav Res Logist 48(6):484–495
Teunter R (2004) Lot-sizing for inventory systems with product recovery. Comput Ind Eng 46(3):431–441
Tsai DM (2012) Optimal ordering and production policy for a recoverable item inventory system with learning effect. Int J Syst Sci 43(2):349–367
Waters D (2003) Inventory control and management. Wiley, UK
Yang PC, Wee HM, Chung SL, Ho PC (2010) Sequential and global optimization for a closed-loop deteriorating inventory supply chain. Math Comput Model 52(1–2):161–176
Yuan KF, Gao Y (2010) Inventory decision-making models for a closed-loop supply chain system. Int J Prod Res 48(20):6155–6187
Yuan KF, Ma SH, He B, Gao Y (2015) Inventory decision-making models for a closed-loop supply chain system with different decision-making structures. Int J Prod Res 53(1):183–219
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Derivation of the expected shortage of the returned product at the remanufacturer during each remanufacturing cycle
From Eq. (6), we have
The expression (24) can be rewritten as
Since xr ~ N(μrT, σ2rT), the above equation can be written as
Let \(I = \int\limits_{{R_{r} - S_{r} }}^{\infty } {\left( {x_{r} - \left( {R_{r} - S_{r} } \right)} \right)f\left( {x_{r} } \right)dx_{r} }\), which can be written as
On substituting \(f\left( {x_{r} } \right) = \frac{1}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} \sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{x_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}} \right)^{2} }}\), we get
Let \(\frac{{x_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }} = y\), therefore \(dx_{r} = \sigma \sqrt {rT} dy\)
Hence, \(I = \sigma \sqrt {rT} \int\limits_{{\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}}}^{\infty } {y\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}y^{2} }} dy} + \left[ {\mu rT - \left( {R_{r} - S_{r} } \right)} \right]\int\limits_{{\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}}}^{\infty } {\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}y^{2} }} dy}\).
Let \(I_{\text{I}} = \sigma \sqrt {rT} \int\limits_{{\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}}}^{\infty } {y\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}y^{2} }} dy}\) and \(I_{\text{II}} = \left[ {\mu rT - \left( {R_{r} - S_{r} } \right)} \right]\int\limits_{{\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}}}^{\infty } {\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}y^{2} }} dy}\).
Consider the expression \(I_{\text{I}} = \sigma \sqrt {rT} \int\limits_{{\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}}}^{\infty } {y\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}y^{2} }} dy}\) and let \({{y^{2} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{y^{2} } 2}} \right. \kern-0pt} 2} = t\), therefore \(ydy = dt\).
Hence, \(I_{\text{I}} = \sigma \sqrt {rT} \int\limits_{{\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{{R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT}}{{\sigma \sqrt {rT} }}} \right)^{2} }}^{\infty } {\frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{ - t} dt} ,\) that is
Using \(S_{r} = k_{r} \sigma \sqrt {rT}\), and \(R_{r} = \mu rT - k_{r} \sigma \sqrt {rT}\) from Eq. (4), we have
Let zr = 2kr, and so
Hence, \(I_{\text{I}} = \sigma \sqrt {rT} \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\pi } }}e^{{ - \frac{1}{2}\left( { - z_{r} } \right)^{2} }}\) that is
where \(\phi ( \cdot )\) is pdf of the standard normal distribution.
Next,
Therefore,
where \(\Phi ( \cdot )\) is cdf of the standard normal distribution.
Now, from Eq. (30), \(\left[ {\mu rT - \left( {R_{r} - S_{r} } \right)} \right] = z_{r} \sigma \sqrt {rT}\), and so
Therefore, from Eq. (29), \(B(R_{r} ) = \left( {R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT} \right) + \sigma \sqrt {rT} \left[ {\phi (z_{r} ) + z_{r} \Phi (z_{r} )} \right]\) and on substituting \(\left( {R_{r} - S_{r} - \mu rT} \right) = - z_{r} \sigma \sqrt {rT}\) from Eq. (30), we get
Appendix 2: The first and second partial derivatives of EJTC(·)
and
Appendix 3: Test of convexity of the proposed model
To show the convexity of cost function in Eq. (11), all principal minors of the Hessian matrix of the cost function must be positive, i.e. \(H_{1} > 0\),\(H_{2} > 0\), \(H_{3} > 0\), \(H_{4} > 0\), \(H_{5} > 0\), \(H_{6} > 0\).
Here,
where \(H_{6} = \left| H \right|\); \(\left| \bullet \right|\) is the Hessian determinant and λij (i, j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) are the second order partial derivatives of the cost function given by Eq. (11).
The second order partial derivatives of the cost function (11) are given below:
The remaining expressions of the second order partial derivatives, i.e. \(\lambda_{11} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial k_{m}^{2} }}\), \(\lambda_{22} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial k_{l}^{2} }}\),\(\lambda_{33} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial z_{r}^{2} }}\), \(\lambda_{44} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial m^{2} }}\), \(\lambda_{55} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial l^{2} }}\), and \(\lambda_{66} = \frac{{\partial^{2} EJTC\left( \cdot \right)}}{{\partial T^{2} }}\) are mentioned in Appendix 2.
Appendix 4: Derivation of the FSC model
The expression of the EJTC per unit time of the FSC corresponding to the CLSC under study is obtained from Eq. (11) by setting the parameters associated with the returned and remanufactured products as zero (i.e. A3, h3, A4, h4, r, Ll, πr= 0). Thus, the expression for the EJTC per unit time of the FSC is given by
To minimize the EJTC in Eq. (40), we take the first partial derivatives of the EJTC in Eq. (40) with respect to each decision variable while keeping other decision variables fixed, and setting them to zero, we obtain
and
The optimal value of the decision variables km, m (integer) and T, and the corresponding EJTC of the FSC are obtained from Eqs. (41), (42), (43), and (40) by using the iterative method similar to the CLSC model as explained in Sect. 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mawandiya, B.K., Jha, J.K. & Thakkar, J.J. Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return. Oper Res Int J 20, 1623–1664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0398-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0398-x