Abstract
Background
Studies suggest that patients who present with atypical chest pain and are low or low-intermediate risk can safely undergo a rapid rule-out for cardiac ischemia with serial ECGs and cardiac biomarkers followed by additional testing as needed. We sought to evaluate a novel Emergency Department (ED) protocol for patients to undergo their additional functional testing as an outpatient.
Methods
Patients presenting to the ED with atypical chest pain, normal ECG, and negative cardiac troponin felt to be low risk were referred for outpatient stress testing within 72 hours of presentation as part of a pilot program. We analyzed test characteristics, length of stay, and 30-day return visits to ED in the pilot group and compared results to a similar cohort assessed in the ED by a traditional chest pain observation protocol.
Results
A total of 156 patients were included over a 5-month period with 29.5% not returning for testing. There was a 70% reduction in length of stay for outpatient stress test protocol patients. All-cause and cardiac return visits to the ED were not significantly different between the outpatient cohort and the traditional chest pain unit group and were reduced by 47 and 75%, respectively, in patients who completed their outpatient testing. The provisional injection protocol resulted in a 81% reduction in radiation exposure when compared to traditional MPI stress protocols due to a greater utilization of exercise treadmill tests without imaging.
Conclusion
Outpatient stress testing is a reliable alternative to traditional chest pain observation with a significantly shorter length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, and improved radiation safety profile for patients when compared to traditional inpatient observation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SPECT:
-
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- ED:
-
Emergency Department
- ECGs:
-
Electrocardiograms
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- mSv:
-
Millisieverts
- ETT:
-
Exercise Treadmill Test
- MPI:
-
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
References
Kontos MC, Diercks DB, Kirk JD. Emergency department and office-based evaluation of patients with chest pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:284-99.
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Lewis WR, Turnipseed SD. Exercise testing in chest pain units: rationale, implementation, and results. Cardiol Clin 2005;23:vii.
Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Turnipseed SD, Amsterdam EA. Evaluation of chest pain suspicious for acute coronary syndrome: Use of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain evaluation unit. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:40B-8B discussion 9B.
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756-76.
Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): Developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007;116:e148-304.
Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE Jr, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:645-81.
Bourque JM, Holland BH, Watson DD, Beller GA. Achieving an exercise workload of > or = 10 metabolic equivalents predicts a very low risk of inducible ischemia: does myocardial perfusion imaging have a role? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:538-45.
Duvall WL, Levine EJ, Moonthungal S, Fardanesh M, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. A hypothetical protocol for the provisional use of perfusion imaging with exercise stress testing. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:739-47.
Duvall WL, Savino JA, Levine EJ, Hermann LK, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. Prospective evaluation of a new protocol for the provisional use of perfusion imaging with exercise stress testing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:305-16.
Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Hingorani R, Bewley B, Khan SM, et al. Stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging in an emergency department chest pain unit. J Emerg Med 2012;42:642-50.
Gowd BM, Heller GV, Parker MW. Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:1200-12.
Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e1-157.
Cousins C, Miller DL, Bernardi G, Rehani MM, Schofield P, Vano E, et al. ICRP PUBLICATION 120: Radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP 2013;42:1-125.
Paquet F, Etherington G, Bailey MR, Leggett RW, Lipsztein J, Bolch W, et al. ICRP Publication 130: Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 1. Ann ICRP 2015;44:5-188.
Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL. The future of SPECT MPI: Time and dose reduction. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:580-7.
Bufalino VJ, Berkowitz SA, Gardner TJ, Pina IL, Konig M, Payment AHAEPo, et al. American Heart Association’s call to action for payment and delivery system reform. Circulation 2017;136:e162-71.
Meyer MC, Mooney RP, Sekera AK. A critical pathway for patients with acute chest pain and low risk for short-term adverse cardiac events: Role of outpatient stress testing. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:427-35.
Disclosure
Besiana Liti, Felix Krainski, Andre Gabriel, Brett Hiendlmeyr, Akrivi Manola, William Perucki, Gene Pershwitz, Ajay Kumar, and W. Lane Duvall have nothing to disclose regarding this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.
Funding
All funding and support for this work came from within the Division of Cardiology at Hartford Hospital.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liti, B., Krainski, F., Gabriel, A. et al. Clinical effectiveness of an outpatient pathway for low-risk chest pain emergency department visits. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 27, 1341–1348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01814-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01814-9