Abstract
Background
Accurate quantification of plaque imaging using 18F-NaF PET requires partial volume correction (PVC).
Methods
PVC of PET data was implemented by the use of a local projection (LP) method. LP-based PVC was evaluated with an image quality (NEMA) and with a thorax phantom with “plaque-type” lesions of 18-36 mL. The validated PVC method was then applied to a cohort of 17 patients, each with at least one plaque in the carotid or ascending aortic arteries. In total, 51 calcified (HU > 110) and 16 non-calcified plaque lesions (HU < 110) were analyzed. The lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) and the relative change of LBR (ΔLBR) were measured on PET.
Results
Following PVC, LBR of the spheres (NEMA phantom) was within 10% of the original values. LBR of the thoracic lesions increased by 155% to 440% when the LP-PVC method was applied to the PET images. In patients, PVC increased the LBR in both calcified [mean = 78% (−8% to 227%)] and non-calcified plaques [mean = 41%, (−9%-104%)].
Conclusions
PVC helps to improve LBR of plaque-type lesions in both phantom studies and clinical patients. Better results were obtained when the PVC method was applied to images reconstructed with point spread function modeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are frequently caused by the rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque, thus, resulting in thrombotic occlusion or distal embolization.1,2 Early calcium deposits are common constituents of atherosclerotic plaques, and, therefore, serve as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis.3 CT imaging has been used to assess the severity of vascular calcification and the atherosclerotic plaque burden.4 However, CT calcium scores do not represent the pathophysiologic behavior of plaques and, therefore, do not correlate well with cardiovascular risk factors.5
In view of the similarities between calcification extent and osteogenesis,3 18F-NaF uptake in PET has been described as a marker of ongoing calcium deposition in vulnerable plaque in the carotid arteries.6,7,8,9,10 These studies, however, showed significant discrepancies between PET and CT findings. While the areas with positive PET uptake correlated with the CT-based calcification, only a fraction of the calcifications identified on CT images presented a significant 18F-NaF uptake. Recently, Fiz et al. demonstrated an inverse correlation between calcification and 18F-NaF uptake of plaques in the carotid arteries in a cohort of 64 patients.11 These studies share one potential limitation. Due to the small size of the vulnerable plaques, which is comparable to the typical spatial resolution of PET, partial volume effects (PVE) may arise and compromise the quantification accuracy of 18F-NaF PET uptake in plaques.
Numerous approaches have been proposed for partial volume correction (PVC) in nuclear medicine applications.12,13,14,15,16 These techniques can be divided into two main categories: within-reconstruction and post-reconstruction methods,12 which include projection-based methods, such as the local projection (LP) method proposed for SPECT17,18 and for pre-clinical PET.19
While numerous studies have demonstrated the importance of PVC in neurology, psychiatry, oncology, or cardiology,16 few studies have addressed this question regarding PET quantification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques, while merely focusing on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG).2,20 More recently, Huet et al. stated the importance of implementing advanced PVC methods for a proper assessment of plaque inflammation or calcification with PET.21
The aim of this work was to evaluate a PVC method for clinical PET imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. More specifically, this was done by validating the LP method17,18 on phantom scans and subsequently applying it to clinical 18F-NaF PET images of patients with plaques in the carotid or aortic arteries.
Materials and Methods
Partial Volume Correction Method
Consider J different tissue compartments, including the lesion of interest, within a small VOI delineated in the object as shown in Figure 1a (for J = 2). The measured emission projection counts for each sinogram bin, λ i , can be modeled as the sum of the projection counts from each of the j-segmented tissue (with unit activity concentration), scaled by their respective activity, plus the counts originating from the global background outside the VOI, as shown in Eq. (1):
where λ i are the expected counts per sinogram bin, i, A j the activity for each segmented tissue j within the VOI, P ij is the resolution-blurred tissue shape function for tissue j and sinogram bin i, and \( g_{{{\text{out,}}i}} \) represents the background counts coming from the region outside the VOI in each sinogram bin i. Note that the indices i and j increase through the sinogram bins in the projected space and the segmented tissues in the image space, respectively. The tissue activities A j can be determined by fitting the measured projection data to the model in Eq. (1). Further details can be found in Appendix 1. These tissue activities (A j ) can be used as a prior in a new reconstruction procedure, which is in this study performed using the software for tomographic image reconstruction (STIR).22 This step leads to a locally “partial volume corrected (PVC)” PET image, with improved visual appearance and quantification of the lesions of interest. A schematic view of the procedure is presented in Figure 1b.
-
First, the system matrix values (P ij ) for each tissue and the global background g out,i that affects the VOI activity estimates are computed.
-
Later, the LP activities for each segmented tissue are obtained, and the activity in each voxel within the VOI is substituted with the tissue activities obtained with the LP method.
-
The resulting image is forward-projected using the STIR projector. A realistic physical modeling of the system is included within the projector, with attenuation and scatter estimates from the anatomical CT image and realistic Poisson noise (taking into account the activity concentration and the acquisition time) included into the forward projection. The scatter was estimated using a version of the Single Scatter Simulation (SSS) algorithm available in STIR.22 This step results in realistic “simulated” projection data for the given acquisition.
-
The resulting sinogram is reconstructed using a conventional “Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization” (OSEM) algorithm,23 available within the STIR library, with 5 iterations and 21 subsets. No further changes of the LP activity values were made in the new reconstruction procedure. Scatter and attenuation corrections were included into the iterative reconstruction algorithm as additive and multiplicative terms to the estimated data, respectively. This additional reconstruction procedure yields the PVC image.
The above-described procedure for PVC was employed in all the phantom and patient studies. In all cases, the standard PET images were obtained using the vendor software. Two different reconstruction algorithms were used for the reconstruction of the standard PET images: ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm23 and an OSEM reconstruction with point spread function modeling (PSF).24 All the relevant physical corrections (attenuation, scatter, normalization, decay, dead time) were included in the vendor OSEM and PSF algorithms. After reconstruction, the LP method for PVC was applied, and the LP activity values were used in an additional STIR reconstruction in order to obtain the PVC image.
Phantom Evaluations
The clinical implementation of the LP method was evaluated using acquisitions of a NEMA NU2-2012 IQ phantom25 and a human-sized thorax phantom.26 The NEMA phantom contains six fillable spheres with internal diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm (Figure 2a) with an experimental lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) of 4.95, which is in accordance with the LBR values recommended by the NEMA NU-2 2012 protocol for the measurement of image quality (two acquisitions with LBR 4:1 and 8:1, respectively33). The thorax phantom has three spherical “plaque-type” lesions of 36, 31, and 18 mm3 inserted (Figure 2b) with a LBR of 70:1, following the values suggested in Delso et al.27
NEMA IQ phantom data and the thorax phantom were acquired using a Biograph true-point true-view (TPTV) PET/CT28 and Biograph mCT PET/CT system, respectively.29 The parameters for the acquisition and the reconstruction of the data are summarized in Table 1. OSEM and PSF algorithms, both available from the vendor software, were used for the reconstruction of the acquired images.
18F-NaF PET/CT Patient Studies
The LP-based PVC method (Figure 1) was applied retrospectively to a cohort of patients with multiple myeloma, who underwent 18F-NaF PET/CT whole-body imaging to characterize bone lesions. In this work, we evaluated the 18F-NaF PET uptake in the carotid or ascending aortic arteries. In total, 17 patients (12 male, 5 female, mean age: (64 ± 9) years, range: (47-77) years) with at least one positive plaque were analyzed. Plaques were classified as calcified (HU > 110 within the plaque) and non-calcified (HU < 110), and calcification was defined as the area with a minimum density of 110 HU on CT. Given the fact that a low-dose attenuation-corrected CT (AC_CT) image was used for anatomical reference, a comparatively low HU value,10,11,30 was used as a threshold level for the definition of calcified plaque. In total, 51 calcified (HU > 110 within the plaque) and 16 non-calcified plaque lesions (HU < 110) were analyzed. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
All scans were performed on a Biograph TPTV system.27 The patients were injected with (4.3 ± 1.0) MBq/kg (range: 3.1-6.0 MBq/kg) of 18F-NaF. The post-injection delay interval was (56 ± 12) minute (range: 34-70 minute), and the PET acquisition time was 2 minute per bed position. 3D PET data were reconstructed using a PSF reconstruction with resolution modeling available from the vendor (4 iterations, 21 subsets). One-bed position image centered in the head-neck region, with 336 × 336 × 109 matrix size and 2.03 × 2.03 × 2.03 mm3 voxel size, was obtained for each patient.
Segmentation Methods
In the cases of calcified plaques and NEMA spheres, the segmentation of the local VOI was performed using a low-dose CT image (512 × 512 × 109 voxels and 1.37 × 1.37 × 2.03 mm3 per voxel) co-registered to the PET image. A threshold-based segmentation of the PET image was performed in non-calcified plaque lesions and the thorax phantom data. This segmentation was made using the 3D isocontour half-way between the maximum voxel activity and the mean background activity, as defined by Boellaard et al.31 The dependence of the PVC results on the method used for segmentation was evaluated with NEMA IQ phantom acquisitions.
Data Analysis
Phantom data The quantification accuracy was evaluated by measuring the LBR and the relative change of LBR (ΔLBR) after applying the PVC method, for each hot sphere and for each plaque-type lesion. The LBR for each hot lesion was measured using the maximum voxel activity within the sphere (LBRmax) and the mean activity within a 3D isocontour at 50% of the maximum voxel activity adapted to the mean background activity (LBRA50). The ΔLBR was calculated as
where LBR(PVC) is the lesion-to-background ratio after applying the PVC (measured from the tissue activities obtained with the LP method or from the PVC image) and LBR(noPVC) is the lesion-to-background ratio measured in the image reconstructed with the vendor software (OSEM or PSF). The activity of the background region, on other hand, was determined by drawing several VOIs in uniform regions.
Patient data The maximum HU value within the plaque was evaluated from the CT images. All plaque lesions were classified into four groups: non-calcified (HU < 110), light calcified plaque (110 < HU < 210), medium calcified plaque (210 ≤ HU < 550), and heavy calcified plaque (HU ≥ 550). For calcified plaques, the volume was determined from the CT image by defining all the voxels within the plaque. For non-calcified plaques, we measured the volume of the segmented plaque lesion from the PET threshold-based segmentation. From the PET images, the chosen figures of merit were the LBR using the maximum (LBRmax) and mean (LBRmean) pixel values within the segmented plaque lesion, and the ΔLBR after applying the partial volume correction [Eq. (2)]. The background region was depicted in an arterial region where neither calcium deposition nor increased 18F-NaF uptake was detected. This region was placed between 10 mm and 15 mm below the location of the plaque lesion. The LBR and ΔLBR for each group of patients were reported as mean ± SD.
The dependence of the LBRmax and ΔLBRmax on the density of the plaque (in HU) and the segmented volume was evaluated by fitting the data to the following analytical expression:
where the dependent variable “y” is LBR or ΔLBR and the independent variable “x” is the density or the segmented volume of the plaque. A and B are the fitting parameters. The first term of the equation represents the non-linear dependence close to x = 0 (small volume or low HU value of the plaque), while the second term represents the uniform LBR or ΔLBR values observed for large, heavy plaques. Pearson and Spearman coefficients were evaluated to test correlations between the measured variables, and a one-sided paired t test was used to evaluate statistical significant changes in the LBRmax and ΔLBRmax values obtained with the PSF, PSF + PVC, and LP methods.
In 6 of 17 patients, a small misalignment was observed between the PET and the CT image volumes in the carotid region. In these cases, we performed an additional manual fine-tuning of spatial alignment of the images following a rigid affine translation.
Results
Validation of the PVC Method and the Segmentation Approaches
Figure 3 shows the comparison of the standard OSEM and PSF reconstructions with their corresponding PVC images, for the acquisitions of the NEMA IQ phantom. The local PVC performance is illustrated for the 10-, 13-, and 17-mm spheres. The activity profiles across these spheres are shown in Figure 3(bottom). The quantification of the spheres was significantly improved when the PVC method was applied.
Table 2 summarizes the performance of the PVC method by means of the dependence of the LBRmax and LBRA50 values on the sphere size (for the NEMA IQ phantom). The LBR values were obtained from the standard images (OSEM and PSF columns) and from the PVC images obtained using the CT-based (OSEM + PVC − CT, PSF + PVC − CT) and the PET-based (OSEM + PVC − PET, PSF + PVC − PET) segmentation approaches. The three columns to the right provide the sphere-to-background ratio obtained using the segmented tissue activities obtained with the LP method (LP − CT and LP − PET, see Figure 1B step 2) and the experimental values measured in a well counter (EXP). The quantification accuracy for the spheres was significantly improved when PVC was applied, yielding LBRmax and LBRA50 values close to the reference value (EXP).
The performance of the PVC method for the plaque-type lesions in the thorax phantom is summarized in Table 3. Figure 4 shows coronal views of OSEM and OSEM + PVC reconstructions of the thorax phantom with the three plaque-type lesions. Similar results were obtained for the PSF reconstructions. A significant increase in the LBRmax and LBRA50 values was observed when PVC was applied to the images (ΔLBRmax values between 115% and 328% for the three plaque lesions). Furthermore, even larger ΔLBRmax values than the ones reported above were observed when comparing the LBR values in the uncorrected images with the tissue activities obtained from the LP method (values between 155% and 475%).
Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaque
Figure 5 shows transaxial images of patients with calcified and non-calcified plaque in the carotids. After PVC, both plaque uptake and delineation of the calcified plaques improve. More specifically, a significant increase of the LBRmax was observed in both calcified [mean = 78%, (−8% to 227%)] and non-calcified plaques [mean = 41%, (−9% to 104%)], when the LP method was applied. The relation between LBRmax and ΔLBRmax with the plaque segmented volume is presented in Figure 6a, b. As expected, the ΔLBRmax increases when the volume of the plaque decreases. Figure 6c, d shows the dependence of the LBRmax and ΔLBRmax on the density of the plaque for calcified plaque lesions. In that case, the LBRmax does not demonstrate a significant dependence on plaque density in the absence of PVC. However, we observe a higher LBR for lighter plaques for the case when PVC is applied. This observation is reinforced when the identified plaques are classified into the four groups mentioned above (see materials and methods, data analysis), as can be seen in Tables 4 and 5. Note that the empirical fits in Figure 6 are presented solely to guide the eye of the readers; they do not imply a theoretical dependence, following the fitted function, of the LBR and ΔLBR values with the volume or the HU of the plaque.
Table 6 shows the fitting parameters for all the fits in Figure 6 and the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients between the measured variables. As expected, the fitting parameter A for the LBRmax vs HU curves was close to zero when no PVC was applied, demonstrating that the LBR does not depend significantly on the HU value in the PSF images. In contrast, for the PSF + PVC and LP methods, a significant dependence was observed. A similar behavior was found in the LBRmax vs volume curves. Positive correlations were found between the LBR/ΔLBR and the segmented volume or HU of the plaque in the PSF images. However, for the PSF + PVC images and the LP method, the correlation was found to be negative and significantly higher for the LP method than for the PSF + PVC images. The higher values for the Spearman correlation factor in the LP curves confirm the non-linear behavior of these curves. Significant differences between the PSF and the PSF + PVC mean LBR were found (t-statistic = −12.3, P = 5 × 10−19) and between the PSF + PVC and the LP mean LBR values (t-statistic = −6.1, P = 3 × 10−8).
Discussion
In this work, we assess the ability and usefulness of PVC for PET imaging of plaque-type lesions. Based on phantom and patient data, we are able to demonstrate that the LBR of plaque-type lesions increases by up to 475% and 227% in phantoms and patients, respectively, when adopting a PVC method that is based on a previously proposed methodology.19 The demonstrated improvements in LBR should be seen in the light of recent studies by Derlin et al. and Fiz et al., who advocate the use of 18F-NaF PET imaging for the detection and characterization of vulnerable plaques.7,10,11
Of note, the clinical implementation of the LP method differed from the pre-clinical version evaluated in previous work.19 Here, the LP method was implemented only as a post-processing step which, together with the additional STIR reconstruction, results in a PVC image. In the pre-clinical implementation, the LP method was also implemented within the reconstruction process (PVC reconstruction).19 In this work, we decided to evaluate a version of the LP method that would be easier to implement in clinical practice since it is based on a single post-processing step. This approach should make the algorithm more useful in clinical practice, where many retrospective studies do not have the projection data available and not all institutions have access to their own reconstruction algorithm. As we showed in our pre-clinical implementation, PVC reconstruction approaches can be implemented within the STIR reconstruction framework by calling the LP algorithm after each iteration.
The validation of our PVC method was performed by means of acquisition of a NEMA IQ phantom and a human-sized thorax phantom with three plaque-type lesions. Of note, the PSF matrix of the system must be known in order to ensure the best possible performance of the PVC method. Here, we made the assumption that the PSF can be described by a uniform Gaussian function, which is reasonable when the primary structures of interest (e.g., carotids) are located near the center of the PET transaxial field of view (FOV). The Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian blurring was obtained by fitting the LP tissue activities for the 37-mm sphere of the NEMA IQ phantom. As expected, the resulting FWHM values were different for the OSEM (FWHM ~ 8 mm) and PSF (FWHM ~4 mm) reconstructions. The spatially invariant PSF approximation used in this study may not work properly for lesions located far away from the center of the transaxial FOV, given the spatial variance of the PSF.32 In consequence, for lesions located far from the center of the FOV, we expect a reduced accuracy of the LP method. This limitation can be solved with a more accurate description of the PSF.
Both NEMA and thorax phantom experiments showed a significant improvement in quantification accuracy of the lesions when the PVC was applied in OSEM or PSF images (Figures 3, 4; Tables 2, 3). The LBR values for each lesion were closer to the reference in the PVC images. For lesions below 10 mm diameter, total recovery of the PVE was not achieved (Tables 2, 3), thus giving LBR values from the PVC images or from the LP tissue activities well below the experimental values. This is mainly due to two reasons: First, the PET-based segmentation will be significantly bigger than the real size of the lesion due to the spread of activity of these very small sources. Second, for these lesions, the Nyquist sampling condition (lesion sizes bigger than 3 voxels in each spatial direction, voxel size 2.03 mm) is not satisfied, and, therefore, a full recovery of the lesion activities using the LP method is not possible.19 Nonetheless, large activity recovery values were obtained when applying the PVC method. These values could be further enhanced by reducing the voxel size in the PET image and by using a more accurate segmentation from a high-resolution anatomical image.
In general, the measured LP tissue activity ratios were more accurate than those obtained after the additional reconstruction with STIR. While the lesion contrast always appeared to be quantitatively improved in the PVC image (compared to OSEM or PSF alone), the best quantitative results were nevertheless generally obtained using the directly computed LP activity values with no further image reconstruction process.
The generally higher LBR values observed in the PSF reconstructions are more likely due to Gibbs artifacts (overshoots around the boundaries of hot lesions or organs), which are usually inherent to reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery.32,33 We observed that the proposed PVC method corrected for the overestimation of activities, giving LBR closer to the experimental values in the PSF + PVC images and in the LP tissue activities obtained from the PSF images (Table 2).
The performance of the LP method for different segmentation algorithms was evaluated with the NEMA IQ phantom acquisition (Table 2). In general, slightly higher LBR values were observed when the PET threshold-based segmentation was used during PVC. This behavior was more pronounced for smaller spheres. This is due to the fact that the segmented volume of the spheres, using the 50% threshold adapted to background, was always smaller than the actual volume of the sphere (about 70-80% of the actual volume). This is in concordance with similar studies in the literature.34 However, for the plaque-type lesions in the thorax phantom and the smallest non-calcified plaques in the patients, as their size is similar to the voxel size, the LP method using a PET-based segmentation is expected to under-perform the LP method using a CT-based segmentation, due to the spread of activity of very small hot sources.
In patient images, no significant correlations were observed between 18F-NaF plaque uptake in the uncorrected images and CT-based calcifications. However, in the new reconstructed images with PVC, a significant correlation of 18F-NaF uptake and calcification density of the atherosclerotic plaque was observed, due to the better quantitative evaluation of 18F-NaF uptake in the calcified plaques (Table 6). Furthermore, the quantification and inverse correlation further improved when considering the tissue activity values obtained with the LP method (Table 6). As expected, the effect of the PVC was more significant in small calcifications, thus resulting in higher ΔLBR for the smaller light plaque lesions (Figure 6). The non-calcified plaques evaluated in this work were relatively large in size (Tables 4, 5). This result in relatively low ΔLBR values, compared with the ones obtained for light plaque lesions.
For the calcified plaques, a CT-based segmentation of the local VOI was used for the PVC. A limitation of this approach, as for the majority of PVC techniques, is that it can be affected by miss-registration errors.35 We attempted to limit such errors by carefully verifying the spatial alignment of the PET and CT images prior to applying the PVC. In non-calcified lesions, a PET threshold-based segmentation of the local VOI was used for the PVC. This method works well provided the lesion is clearly visible in the non-corrected image and, therefore, can be segmented accurately. This was the case for the non-calcified lesions analyzed in this work.
Limitations and Future Work: Evaluation of Coronary Plaque
The main limitation of the method is that non-calcified lesions must be present and detectable on either PET or CT in order for the proposed PVC to be applicable. Another potential limitation of this study is the possibility of non-compensated patient motion during the acquisitions, which could also affect the co-registration of the PET and CT images, and the quantitative properties of the PET image. However, we consider involuntary motion effect to be of minor importance for this evaluation, considering the short PET acquisition time (2 minute per bed position).
Although pathological features in carotid or aortic arteries are likely representative of general atherosclerotic disease, it is known that most of the deaths from cardiovascular events result from complications of inflammatory plaques in the smaller coronary plaques.36 The application of the PVC method for the evaluation of 18F-NaF uptake in vulnerable plaque in the coronaries, however, represents a more challenging problem, due to the presence of respiratory and cardiac motion, which have to be compensated before applying the PVC.27 The evaluation of an image reconstruction framework, which incorporates motion-compensation (MoCo) and partial volume correction (PVC) for 18F-NaF PET imaging of vulnerable plaque in the coronary arteries, is currently work in progress, with first promising results in simulated data.37
New Knowlegde Gained
We have demonstrated the need for partial volume correction when imaging small structures of interest, such as atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid and aortic arteries by means of PET. PVC can lead to increased LBRmax values up to a factor of 3 in small plaque lesions.
Conclusion
The good performance of the LP-based PVC method was confirmed in both OSEM and PSF reconstructions of phantom data and clinical patients. LBR of plaque-type lesions increased by up to 475% (phantom) and 227% (patients) when PVC was applied. Results from this study following PVC further support reports of an inverse correlation of 18F-NaF uptake in calcified plaques with plaque density.
Abbreviations
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- PVE:
-
Partial volume effect
- PVC:
-
Partial volume correction
- LP:
-
Local projection
- LBR:
-
Lesion-to-background ratio
- ΔLBR:
-
Relative change of lesion-to-background ratio
- OSEM:
-
Ordered subsets expectation maximization
- PSF:
-
Point spread function
References
Weintraub HS. Identifying the vulnerable patient with rupture-prone plaque. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:3F–10F.
Izquierdo-Garcia D, Davies JR, Graves MJ, et al. Comparison of methods for magnetic resonance-guided [18-F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in human carotid arteries. Reproducibility, partial volume correction, and correlation between methods. Stroke 2009;40:86–93.
Doherty TM, Fitzpatrick LA, Inoue D, et al. Molecular, endocrine, and genetic mechanisms of arterial calcification. Endocr Rev 2004;25:629–72.
Rosa GM, Bauckneht M, Masoero G, et al. The vulnerable coronary plaque: Update on imaging technologies. Thromb Haemost 2013;110:706–22.
Pen A, Yam Y, Chen L, Dennie C, McPherson R, Chow BJ. Discordance between Framingham Risk Score and atherosclerotic plaque burden. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1075–82.
Derlin T, Richter U, Bannas P, et al. Feasibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT for imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. J Nucl Med 2010;51:862–5.
Derlin T, Wisotzki C, Richter U, et al. In vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: Correlation with atherogenic risk factors. J Nucl Med 2011;52:362–8.
Beheshti M, Saboury B, Mehta NN, et al. Detection and global quantification of cardiovascular molecular calcification by fluoro18-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A novel concept. Hell J Nucl Med 2011;14:114–20.
Chen W, Dilsizian V. Targeted PET/CT imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: Microcalcification with sodium fluoride and inflammation with fluorodeoxyglucose. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013;15:364.
Derlin T, Tóth Z, Papp L, et al. Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: A dual-tracer PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1020–7.
Fiz F, Morbelli S, Piccardo A, et al. 18F-NaF uptake by atherosclerotic plaque on PET/CT imaging: Inverse correlation between calcification density and mineral metabolic activity. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1019–23.
Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med 2007;48:932–45.
Erlandsson K, Buvat I, Pretorius H, Thomas B, Hutton BF. A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:R119–59.
Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: Principle and validation. J Nucl Med 1998;39:904–11.
Müller-Gartner HW, Links JM, Prince JL, et al. Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992;12:571–83.
Grecchi E, O’Doherty J, Veronese M, Tsoumpas C, Cook GJ, Turkheimer E. Multimodal partial-volume correction: Application to 18F-Fluoride PET/CT bone metastases studies. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1408–14.
Moore SC, Southekal S, McQuaid SJ, Kijewski MF, Mueller SP. Improved regional activity quantitation in nuclear medicine using a new approach to correct for tissue partial volume and crosstalk effects. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:405–16.
Southekal S, McQuaid SJ, Kijewski MF, Moore SC. Evaluation of a method for projection-based tissue-activity estimation within small volumes of interest. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:685–701.
Cal-González J, Moore SC, Park M-A, et al. Improved quantification for local regions of interest in preclinical PET imaging. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:7127–49.
Burg S, Dupas A, Stute S, et al. Partial volume effect estimation and correction in the aortic vascular wall in PET imaging. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:7527–42.
Huet P, Burg S, Le Guludec D, Hyafil F, Buvat I. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: Suggestions for improvement. J Nucl Med 2015;56:552–9.
Thielemans K, Tsoumpas C, Mustafovic S, et al. STIR: Software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:867–83.
Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601–9.
Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:907–21.
National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2012. Rosslyn, USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2012.
Fieseler M, Kugel H, Gigenback F, et al. A dynamic thorax phantom for the assessment of cardiac and respiratory motion correction in PET/MRI: A preliminary evaluation. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 2013;702:59–63.
Delso G, Martinez-Moller A, Bundschuh RA, Nekolla SG, Ziegler SI, Schwaiger M. Preliminary study of the detectability of coronary plaque with PET. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:2145–60.
Jakoby BW, Bercier MY, Watson CC, Bendriem B, Townsend DW. Performance characteristics of a new LSO PET/CT scanner with extended axial field of view and PSF reconstruction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2009;56:633–9.
Jakoby BW, Bercier Y, Conti M, Casey ME, Bendriem B, Townsend DW. Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:2375–89.
Xiang L, Heber D, Rausch I, et al. Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on 18F-FDG PET/MRI: Comparison with a PET/CT hybrid system. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:1503–12.
Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: A simulation study. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1519–27.
Rahmin A, Qi J, Sossi V. Resolution modeling in PET imaging: Theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. Med Phys 2013;40:064301.
Nuyts J. Unconstrained image reconstruction with resolution modelling does not have a unique solution. EJNMMI Phys 2014;1:98.
Firouzian A, Kelly MD, Declerck M. Insight on automated lesion delineation methods for PET data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Res 2012;4:69.
Bai B, Li Q, Leahy RM. MR guided PET image reconstruction. Semin Nucl Med 2013;43:30–44.
Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:C13–8.
Cal-Gonzalez J, Tsoumpas C, Lassen ML, Hacker M, Beyer T. [NaF]-PET imaging of vulnerable plaques in coronary arteries: Impact of motion-compensation and partial volume correction [Abstract]. In: 2015 IEEE NSS-MIC conference.
Acknowledgement
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna. We thank Benjamin Schmidinger, PET/CT technician at our institution, for his support in the phantom experiments.
Disclosure
Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez, Xiang Li, Daniel Heber, Ivo Rausch, Stephen C. Moore, Klaus Schäfers, Marcus Hacker, and Thomas Beyer have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on http://SpringerLink.com.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix 1: Description of the LP method
Appendix 1: Description of the LP method
Consider a reconstructed image with a detected lesion (for instance, an atherosclerotic plaque that shows increased uptake of the administered radiotracer). Our goal is to improve the quantification of the activity concentration in that lesion and removing spill-over activity from neighboring tissues. If we have a precise segmentation of organs and tissues, we can take advantage of this information and improve PET quantification based on the following:
-
It is reasonable to assume that voxels belonging to the same tissue have a more similar activity than voxels belonging to different tissues. In consequence, voxels from different tissues would be represented by different average activity values.
-
We can also estimate the PET counts assigned to the inside of the VOI which actually originated from outside the VOI.
With these assumptions, the measured data, λ i , can be modeled as
where λ i are the expected counts per sinogram bin, i, A j the activity for each segmented tissue j within the VOI, P ij is the resolution-blurred tissue shape function for tissue j and sinogram bin i, and \( g_{{{\text{out}},i}} \) represents the background counts coming from the region outside the VOI.
The joint likelihood of measuring a given projection data set, n, is given by the product of the Poisson probability density function for each measured projection ray, i, over all rays traversing the VOI:
where \( n_{i} \) are the measured counts per LOR. Taking the logarithm of the likelihood, we obtain
If we substitute the λ i values with Eq. (4), we obtain
The tissue activities A j are determined by maximizing the log-likelihood [Eq. (6)] for the expected value λ i . This can be done by taking derivatives of ln(L) with respect of each tissue activity A j and setting the results to zero:
Note that the equations in Eq. 8 cannot be solved analytically for the unknown A j′. Instead, an iterative solution for these equations is sought. Note that the values of \( \uplambda_{i} \), \( g_{{{\text{out}},i}}, \) and A j are updated in each iteration (k).
In this work, we obtain A j using the following procedure:
-
1.
Segment a VOI (containing the lesions of interest) from the registered anatomical image. Project these segmented volumes, with unity activity voxel values, through an accurate forward model to obtain P ij matrix elements which represent the contribution of segmented tissue j (with unit activity concentration) to the i’th PET line of response.
-
2.
Mask (zero) the segmented VOI from the reconstructed image, using the anatomical segmentation performed in step 1, and re-project through the same forward model to obtain g out.
-
3.
Compute all of the necessary matrix elements, \( D_{j} \) and \( H_{{jj^{\prime}}} \), which are simply short-hand expressions for collections of terms that arise from maximization of the log-likelihood:
$$ H_{{jj^{'} }}^{\left( k \right)} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i} \frac{{P_{{ij^{'} }} P_{ij} }}{{\uplambda_{i}^{\left( k \right)} }} $$(9)$$ D_{j}^{(k)} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i} \frac{{P_{ij} (n_{i} - g_{out,i}^{(k)} )}}{{\uplambda_{i}^{(k)} }}. $$(10) -
4.
From the matrix elements calculated previously, estimate the values of tissue activities by inverting the matrix H to solve equation 1, obtaining
$$ A_{j}^{(k)} = \mathop \sum \limits_{{j^{'} = 1}}^{J} \left[ {H_{jj'}^{(k)} } \right]^{ - 1} D_{j}^{(k)}. $$(11) -
5.
The procedure above is repeated from step 3 using new estimates of the \( A^{(k)}_{j} \) to compute new elements of matrices H and D, and, after that, improved estimates of the \( A^{(k)}_{j} \). This procedure is repeated until the estimates change by less than a very small amount in a single iteration. The convergence of the method is usually very fast, achieving convergence within two to three iterations.
The obtained tissue activities (A j ) can be used as a prior in a new reconstruction procedure to obtain a locally “Partial Volume Corrected (PVC)” PET image, as detailed in Figure 1. Note that the LP method conserves the total number of counts in the image, as it just re-assigns counts from one segmented region to another, seeking for consistency between the tissue segmentation and the PET activity distribution.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Cal-Gonzalez, J., Li, X., Heber, D. et al. Partial volume correction for improved PET quantification in 18F-NaF imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 25, 1742–1756 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0778-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0778-2