Abstract
The clinical benefits and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced HCC are inconsistent in clinical studies. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HAIC combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We searched the database up to March 1, 2023, for studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of HAIC combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced HCC. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022323712). Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), diseases control rate (DCR), and adverse effects (AEs). The hazard ratio (HR) and odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the pooled effect. Six studies with 318 patients in the combination group and 338 patients in the control group were included. Meta-analysis showed that HAIC combined with sorafenib significantly improves OS compared with sorafenib alone (HR = 9.70, 95% CI 4.52–20.82] and HAIC combined with sorafenib significantly improves PFS compared with sorafenib alone (HR = 9.48, 95% CI 4.47–20.13). Besides, HAIC combined with sorafenib did not show significantly advantage of DCR rate (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.93–3.69), but associated with higher rates of ORR compared with sorafenib alone (OR = 9.85, 95% CI 3.05–31.85). HAIC combined with sorafenib can achieve a better effect and survival benefits than sorafenib alone in patients with advanced HCC, but the limitation should be treated with cautions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Li SH, Guo ZX, Xiao CZ, et al. Risk factors for early and late intrahepatic recurrence in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion after curative resection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2013;14:4759–63.
Cha C, Dematteo RP. Molecular mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma development. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19:25–37.
EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines. management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–43.
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2018;68:723–50.
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:25–34.
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.
Park JW, Kim YJ, Kim DY, et al. Sorafenib with or without concurrent transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The phase III STAH trial. J Hepatol. 2019;70:684–91.
He M, Li Q, Zou R, et al. sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin vs sorafenib alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:953–60.
Kokudo N, Takemura N, Hasegawa K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Japan Society of Hepatology 2017 (4th JSH-HCC guidelines) 2019 update. Hepatol Res. 2019;49:1109–13.
Xie DY, Ren ZG, Zhou J, et al. 2019 Chinese clinical guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights. Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition. 2020;9:452–63.
Kong SY, Song JJ, Jin YQ, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Clin Belg. 2023;78(2):171–9.
Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T. Current status of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Liver cancer. 2015;4:188–99.
Nouso K, Miyahara K, Uchida D, et al. Effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the Nationwide Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1904–7.
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.
Ikeda M, Shimizu S, Sato T, et al. Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:2090–6.
Kudo M, Ueshima K, Yokosuka O, et al. Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:424–32.
Zheng K, Zhu X, Fu S, et al. Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: a randomized trial. Radiology. 2022;303:211545.
Ikuta S, Aihara T, Yamanaka N. Efficacy of sequential sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective single-institution study. Contemp Oncol (Poznan, Poland). 2018;22:165–71.
Zhao Y, Lai J, Liang R, et al. Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Interv Med. 2019;2:78–83.
Knudsen ES, Gopal P, Singal AG. The changing landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma: etiology, genetics, and therapy. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:574–83.
Kudo M, Trevisani F, Abou-Alfa GK, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic guidelines and medical treatment. Liver cancer. 2016;6:16–26.
Yan J, Deng M, Kong S, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization in combination with programmed death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a mini review. iLIVER. 2022;1(4):225–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2022.10.001.
Wei J, Niu M, Yabo O, et al. Advances in artificial intelligence techniques drive the application of radiomics in the clinical research of hepatocellular carcinoma. iLIVER. 2022;1(1):49–54.
Ouyang G, Pan G, Xu H, et al. Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54:675–81.
Shimose S, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka M, et al. Lenvatinib prolongs the progression-free survival time of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: a multicenter cohort study using data mining analysis. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:2257–65.
Ueda H, Fukuchi H, Tanaka C. Toxicity and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Review). Oncol Lett. 2012;3:259–63.
Song DS, Song MJ, Bae SH, et al. A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:445–54.
Zhuang BW, Li W, Xie XH, et al. Sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:845–55.
Liu M, Shi J, Mou T, et al. Systematic review of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:1277–87.
Yan J, Deng M, Li T, et al. Efficacy and complications of transarterial chemoembolization alone or in combination with different protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. iLIVER. 2023;2(2):130–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2023.03.002.
Liu Y, Wang Y, Wei Z, et al. Exploratory study of microparticle transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma. iLIVER. 2022;1(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2022.01.001.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK and HW contributed to conceptualization; SK and JY performed validation; SK and HY were involved in writing––original draft preparation; JY and SK were involved in writing—review and editing; SK and JS provided software.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has identified any conflicts of interest and financial disclosures.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Therefore, this paper is exempt from further Ethical Committee approval.
Informed consent
All data were derived from previously published studies, so the informed consent statement is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kong, S., Yu, H., Wang, H. et al. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Gastroenterol 16, 793–802 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-023-01860-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-023-01860-4