Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two cases of rapid progression of esophageal varices after atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report two cases of rapid progression of esophageal varices after atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Case 1: a man in his 60s with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis after viral eradication by direct acting antiviral. He was diagnosed with HCC 8 years previously. He had undergone surgical resection 4 times, radio-frequency ablation (RFA) several times, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, HCC progressed and could not be controlled by locoregional treatment. Systemic chemotherapy was, therefore, selected. Atezolizumab–bevacizumab was administered after lenvatinib and sorafenib failure. Before starting treatment, his liver function was preserved (Child–Pugh score 5 and class A). His alpha fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin levels were 3.6 ng/mL and 443 mAU/mL, respectively. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no remarkable esophageal varices before atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment. Nine months after the initiation of atezolizumab–bevacizumab, the patient was admitted for hematemesis from esophageal varices. The disease control of HCC was classified as stable disease (SD) for the liver and lung metastases, and partial response for the lymph node metastases. Neither AST nor ALT was markedly elevated in the clinical course. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for the spurting point of large esophageal varices with red wale signs was able to successfully achieve hemostasis. Atezolizumab–bevacizumab was stopped and additional EVL eradicated the esophageal varices. However, the post-banding ulcer was prolonged in comparison to usual cases. Case 2: a man in his 60s with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis after viral eradication by direct acting antiviral therapy. He was diagnosed with HCC 6 years previously. He had received RFA 2 times and TACE 7 times. Atezolizumab–bevacizumab was administered after lenvatinib failure. The disease control of HCC was classified as SD; however, the esophageal varices ruptured after 15 courses of atezolizumab–bevacizumab. Neither AST nor ALT were markedly elevated in the clinical course. The esophageal varices of these patients did not require treatment before atezolizumab–bevacizumab; however, they rapidly worsened and ruptured during atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment. Although rare, similar cases with rapid progression of portal hypertension after atezolizumab–bevacizumab have been reported. We should pay attention to the worsening of esophageal varices during atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment and poor wound healing after EVL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujiwara N, Friedman SL, Goossens N, et al. Risk factors and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of precision medicine. J Hepatol. 2018;68:526–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391:1301–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Association for the study of the liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo M, Matsui O, Izumi N, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization failure/refractoriness: JSH-LCSGJ criteria 2014 update. Oncology. 2014;87:22–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatanaka T, Naganuma A, Kakizaki S. Lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1894–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo M, Kawamura Y, Hasegawa K, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: JSH consensus statements and recommendations 2021 update. Liver Cancer. 2021;10:181–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Honma Y, Shibata M, Gohda T, et al. Rapid progression of liver fibrosis induced by acute liver injury due to immune-related adverse events of atezolizumab. Intern Med. 2021;60:1847–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riveiro-Barciela M, Gonzalez-Sans D, Marmolejo D, et al. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome associated with nivolumab: an uncommon adverse event related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2021;30:171–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology. 2014;60:715–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Campion B, Larrey E, Wagner M, et al. Portal hypertension, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and therapy by atezolizumab-bevacizumab: a “menage à trois.” Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;46:101785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. West H, McCleod M, Hussein M, et al. Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:924–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmid P, Rugo HS, Adams S, et al. Atezolizumab plus nabpaclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:44–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Imoto K, Kohjima M, Hioki T, et al. Clinical features of liver injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in Japanese patients. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:6391712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fang P, Hu J, Cheng Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of phase II trials. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e49717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Agarwal V, Sgouros J, Smithson J, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease) in a patient receiving bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2008;2:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Riveiro-Barciela M, González-Sans D, Marmolejo D, et al. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome associated with nivolumab: an uncommon adverse event related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2021;30:171–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugiyama T, Mizuno M, Aoki Y, et al. A single-arm study evaluating bevacizumab, cisplatin, and paclitaxel followed by single-agent bevacizumab in Japanese patients with advanced cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Avastin prescribing information. http://www.gene.com/gene/products/information/pdf/avastin-prescribing.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.

  22. Allaire M, Rudler M, Thabut D. Portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma: Des liaisons dangereuses…. Liver Int. 2021;41:1734–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Kakizaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Human and animal rights

All procedures followed have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

The written informed consent was obtained from patients for this case report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furusawa, A., Naganuma, A., Suzuki, Y. et al. Two cases of rapid progression of esophageal varices after atezolizumab–bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin J Gastroenterol 15, 451–459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-022-01605-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-022-01605-9

Keywords

Navigation