Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Involvement of the Posterior Cerebellum in Reconstructing and Predicting Social Action Sequences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent advances in social neuroscience have highlighted the critical role of the cerebellum and especially the posterior cerebellar Crus in social mentalizing (i.e., theory of mind). Research in the past 5 years has provided growing evidence supporting the view that the posterior cerebellum builds internal action models of our social interactions to predict how other people’s actions will be executed, and what our most likely responses to these actions will be. This paper presents an overview of a series of fMRI experiments on novel tasks involving a combination of (a) the learning or generation of chronological sequences of social actions either in an explicit or implicit manner, which (b) require social mentalizing on another person’s mental state such as goals, beliefs, and implied traits. Together, the results strongly confirm the central role of the posterior cerebellar Crus in identifying and automatizing action sequencing during social mentalizing, and in predicting future action sequences based on social mentalizing inferences about others. This research program has important implications: It provides for the first time (a) fruitful starting points for diagnosing and investigating social sequencing dysfunctions in a variety of mental disorders which have also been related to cerebellar dysfunctions, (b) provides the necessary tools for testing whether non-invasive neurostimulation targeting the posterior cerebellum has a causal effect on social functioning, and (c) whether these stimulation techniques and training programs guided by novel cerebellar social sequencing insights, can be exploited to increase posterior cerebellar plasticity in order to alleviate social impairments in mental disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J. Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schurz M, Radua J, Tholen MG, Maliske L, Margulies DS, Mars RB, … Kanske P. Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: a neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(3):293–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000303

  3. Van Overwalle F. Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(3):829–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fehlbaum LV, Borb R, Paul K, Eickhoff SB, Raschle NM. Early and late neural correlates of mentalizing : ALE meta-analyses in adults , children and adolescents. 2021;(July):1–16.

  5. Guell X, Schmahmann J. Cerebellar functional anatomy: a didactic summary based on human fmri evidence. Cerebellum. 2020;19(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01083-9.

  6. Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, Vandekerckhove M. Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies. Neuroimage. 2014;86:554–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Overwalle F, Baetens K, Mariën P, Vandekerckhove M. Cerebellar areas dedicated to social cognition? A comparison of meta-analytic and connectivity results. Soc Neurosci. 2015;10(4):337–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1005666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabay AS, Radua J, Kempton MJ, Mehta MA. The ultimatum game and the brain: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;47:549–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Overwalle F, Ma Q, Heleven E. The posterior crus II cerebellum is specialized for social mentalizing and emotional self-experiences: a meta-analysis. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020a;15(9):905–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Overwalle F, Manto M, Cattaneo Z, Clausi S, Ferrari C, Gabrieli JDEE, … Leggio M. Consensus paper: cerebellum and social cognition. The Cerebellum. 2020;19(6):833–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-020-01155-1

  11. Van Overwalle F, Van de Steen F, van Dun K, Heleven E. Connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum during social and non-social sequencing using dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2020c;206:116326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luyten P, Campbell C, Allison E, Fonagy P. The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: state of the art and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020;16:297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cauda F, Geda E, Sacco K, D’Agata F, Duca S, Geminiani G, Keller R. Grey matter abnormality in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(12):1304–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.239111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Mello AM, Crocetti D, Mostofsky SH, Stoodley CJ. Cerebellar gray matter and lobular volumes correlate with core autism symptoms. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2015;7:631–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gong, J., Wang, J., Qiu, S., Chen, P., Luo, Z., Wang, J., … Wang, Y. (2020). Common and distinct patterns of intrinsic brain activity alterations in major depression and bipolar disorder: voxel-based meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01036-5

  16. Brady RO, Beermann A, Nye M, Eack SM, Mesholam-Gately R, Keshavan MS, Lewandowski KE. Cerebellar-cortical connectivity is linked to social cognition trans-diagnostically. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020;11(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573002

  17. Bernard JA, Mittal VA. Dysfunctional activation of the cerebellum in schizophrenia. Clin Psychol Sci. 2015;3(4):545–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614542463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang SSHS-H, Kloth AD, Badura A. The cerebellum, sensitive periods, and autism. Neuron. 2014;83(3):518–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Courchesne E, Karns CM, Davis HR, Ziccardi R, Carper RA, Tigue ZD, … Courchesne RY. Unusual brain growth patterns in early life in patients with autistic disorder: an MRI study. Neurology. 2001;57(2):245–254. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.57.2.245

  20. Limperopoulos C, Bassan H, Gauvreau K, Robertson RL, Sullivan NR, Benson CB, … DuPlessis AJ. Does cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high prevalence of long-term cognitive, learning, and behavioral disability in survivors? Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):584–593. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1041

  21. Leggio M, Molinari M. Cerebellar sequencing: a trick for predicting the future. The Cerebellum. 2015;14(1):35–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-014-0616-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baetens K, Firouzi M, Van Overwalle F, Deroost N. Involvement of the cerebellum in the serial reaction time task (SRT) (Response to Janacsek et al.). NeuroImage. 2020;220(February):117114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Friston K, Herreros I. Active inference and learning in the cerebellum. Neural Comput. 2016;28(9):1812–1839. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00863.

  24. De Zeeuw CI, Lisberger SG, Raymond JL. Diversity and dynamism in the cerebellum. Nat. Neurosci. 2020;24(February). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00754-9.

  25. Leggio MG, Chiricozzi FR, Clausi S, Tedesco AM, Molinari M. The neuropsychological profile of cerebellar damage: the sequencing hypothesis. Cortex. 2011;47(1):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kampis D, Fogd D, Kovács ÁM. Nonverbal components of Theory of Mind in typical and atypical development. Infant Behav Dev. 2017;48:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wimmer H, Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition. 1983;13:103–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saxe RR, Schulz LE, Jiang YV. Reading minds versus following rules: dissociating theory of mind and executive control in the brain. Soc Neurosci. 2006;1(3–4):284–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601000446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carlsson E, Miniscalco C, Gillberg C, Åsberg Johnels J. Assessing false-belief understanding in children with autism using a computer application: a pilot study. J Psycholinguist Res. 2018;47(5):1085–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9579-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Langdon R, Coltheart M. Mentalising, schizotypy, and schizophrenia. Cognition. 1999;71:43–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heleven E, van Dun K, Van Overwalle F. The posterior cerebellum is involved in constructing social action sequences: an fMRI study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46962-7

  32. Baron-Cohen S, O’Riordan M, Stone V, Jones R, Plaisted K. Recognition of Faux Pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999;29(5):407–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Overwalle F, De Coninck S, Heleven E, Perrotta G, Ben Taib NO, Manto M, Mariën P. The role of the cerebellum in reconstructing social action sequences: a pilot study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019;14(5): 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz032

  34. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Mechanical, behavioural and Intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 1986;4(2):113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1986.tb01003.x.

  35. Ma Q, Heleven E, Funghi G, Pu M, Baetens K, Deroost N, Van Overwalle F. Implicit learning of true and false belief sequences. Front Psychol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643594

  36. Ma Q, Pu M, Heleven E, Haihambo NP, Baetens K, Baeken C, … Van Overwalle F. The posterior cerebellum supports implicit learning of social belief sequences. Cogn Affect BehavNeurosci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00910-z

  37. Pu M, Heleven E, Delplanque J, Gibert N, Ma Q, Funghi G, Van Overwalle F. The posterior cerebellum supports the explicit sequence learning linked to trait attribution. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience. 2020;in press.

  38. Li M, Ma Q, Baetens K, Pu M, Deroost N, Baeken C, … Van Overwalle F. Social cerebellum in goal-directed navigation. Soc Neurosci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2021.1970017

  39. Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett. 2019;688(April 2018):62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol. 1987;32(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Özdem C, Brass M, Schippers A, Van der Cruyssen L, Van Overwalle F. The neural representation of mental beliefs held by two agents. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00714-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pu M, Ma Q, Heleven E, Haihambo NP, Van Overwalle F. The posterior cerebellum and inconsistent trait implications when learning the sequence of actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021;(October 2020):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab037

  43. Haihambo N, Ma Q, Baeken C, Deroost N, Baetens K, Heleven E, Van Overwalle F. Social thinking is for doing: the posterior cerebellum supports prediction of social actions based on personality traits. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab087

  44. Frith CD, Frith U. How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res. 2006;1079(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Molinari M, Masciullo M. The Implementation of predictions during sequencing. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13(October):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pisotta I, Molinari M. Cerebellar contribution to feedforward control of locomotion. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(JUNE):1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cattaneo Z, Ferrari C, Ciricugno A, Heleven E, Schutter D, Manto M, Van Overwalle F. New horizons on non-invasive brain stimulation of the social and affective cerebellum. The Cerebellum. 2021;in press.

  48. Heleven, Elien, van Dun, K., De Witte, S., Baeken, C., & Van Overwalle, F. (2021). The role of the cerebellum in social and non-social action sequences: a preliminary LF-rTMS study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience: Brain Imaging and Stimulation.

  49. Bersani FS, Minichino A, Fattapposta F, Bernabei L, Spagnoli F, Mannarelli D, … Chiaie RD. Prefrontocerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation increases amplitude and decreases latency of P3b component in patients with euthymic bipolar disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2913–2917. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S91625

  50. Dondé C, Neufeld NH, Geoffroy PA. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on bipolar depression, mania, and euthymia: a systematic review of preliminary data. Psychiatr Q. 2018;89(4):855–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-018-9584-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Minichino A, Bersani FS, Bernabei L, Spagnoli F, Vergnani L, Corrado A, … Chiaie RD. Prefronto–cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation improves visuospatial memory, executive functions, and neurological soft signs in patients with euthymic bipolar disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2265–2270. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S79108

  52. Bation R, Mondino M, Le Camus F, Saoud M, Brunelin J. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;62:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bation R, Poulet E, Haesebaert F, Saoud M, Brunelin J. Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open-label pilot study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;65:153–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Escelsior A, Belvederi Murri M, Calcagno P, Cervetti A, Caruso R, Croce E, … Amore M. Effectiveness of cerebellar circuitry modulation in schizophrenia: a systematic review. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019;207(11):977–986. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001064

  55. Van Overwalle F, Van de Steen F, Mariën P. Dynamic causal modeling of the effective connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum in social mentalizing across five studies. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019;19(1):211–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00659-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Clausi S, Olivito G, Lupo M, Siciliano L, Bozzali M, Leggio M. The cerebellar predictions for social interactions: theory of mind abilities in patients with degenerative cerebellar atrophy. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;12(January):510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. De Zeeuw CI, Lisberger SG, Raymond JL. Diversity and dynamism in the cerebellum. Nature Neuroscience. 2020;24(February). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00754-9

Download references

Funding

This work has been supported by an SRP57 grant by the Vrije Universiteit Brussel awarded to Frank Van Overwalle, Natacha Deroost, and Chris Baeken. There is no other funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

    Frank Van Overwalle, Min Pu, Qianying Ma, Meijia Li, Naem Haihambo, Kris Baetens, Natacha Deroost, Chris Baeken & Elien Heleven

Authors
  1. Frank Van Overwalle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qianying Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meijia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naem Haihambo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kris Baetens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Natacha Deroost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chris Baeken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Elien Heleven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Van Overwalle.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Overwalle, F., Pu, M., Ma, Q. et al. The Involvement of the Posterior Cerebellum in Reconstructing and Predicting Social Action Sequences. Cerebellum 21, 733–741 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01333-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01333-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation