Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comprehensive and narrative review of historical aspects and management of low-grade hallux rigidus: conservative and surgical possibilities

  • Review
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hallux rigidus, Latin for Stiff Toe, is characterized by an osteoarthritic degeneration of the articular surfaces of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The aim of this literature narrative overview is to summarize and expose the great amount of management concepts and information, including the well-codified operative procedures and the more up to date knowledge about non-operative and surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. This may provide current information for physicians, medschool attendants and researchers. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed database has been performed, up to April 1, 2017. Several different types of treatment are described in the literature for low-grade hallux rigidus. The management for hallux rigidus can involve a variety of therapeutic interventions, conservative or operative. Hallux rigidus is a complex disease characterized by several clinical and pathological findings, and to achieve optimal results, surgical treatment for low-grade forms should be chosen between several surgical techniques depending on the degree of arthritis and other different clinical conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cotterill J (1888) Stiffness of the great toe in adolescents. BMJ 1:1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davies-Colley M (1887) Contraction of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe. BMJ 1:728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Saase JL et al (1989) Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis 48:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlin MJ et al (2003) Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 24:731–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton WG et al (1997) Capsular interposition arthroplasty for severe hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 18(2):68–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shereff MJ et al (1986) Kinematics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68A(3):392–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamid KS et al (2015) Clinical Presentation and management of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin 20:391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas DE et al (2015) Hallux rigidus. Relevant Anatomy and Pathophysiology. Foot Ankle Clin 20:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Regnauld B (1986) Disorders of the great toe. In: Elson R (ed) The foot: pathology, etiology, seminology, clinical investigation and treatment. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–281

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hattrup SJ et al (1988) Subjective results of hallux rigidus following treatment with cheilectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:182–191

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlin MJ et al (2003) Hallux rigidus: grading and long term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2072–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beeson P et al (2008) Classification systems for hallux rigidus: a review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int 29:407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kon Kam King C et al (2017) Comprehensive review of non-operative management of hallux rigidus. Cureus 9(1):e987

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shamus J et al (2004) The effect of sesamoid mobilization, flexor hallucis strenghtening, and gait training on reducing pain and restoring function in individuals with hallux limitus: a clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 34:368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feltham GT et al (2001) Age-based outcomes of cheilectomy for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 22(3):192–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mulier T et al (1999) Results after cheilectomy in athletes with hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 20(4):232–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison MH et al (1963) Arthodesis for the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux valgus and rigidus. J Bone J Surg 45:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy JG et al (2006) Outcomes after interpositional arthroplasty for treatment of hallux rigidus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:210–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pulavarti RS et al (2005) First metatarsophalangeal joint replacement using the Bio-Action great toe implant: intermediate results. Foot Ankle Int 26(12):1033–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coughling MJ et al (2003) Hallux rigidus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2072–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolosi N et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of the cheilectomy for degenerative joint disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Foot Ankle Surg 54:1010–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawe ECJ, et al (2012) Early results of minimally invasive cheilectomy for painfull hallux rigidus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94B(XXII):33

  23. Morgan S, et al (2012) Minimally invasive cheilectomy: functional outcome and comparison with open cheilectomy. J Bone 94B(Supp)XLI:93

  24. Mesa-Ramos M et al (2008) Evaluation of the treatment of hallux rigidus by percutaneous surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 74:222–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Watanabe M, et al (1985) Equipments and procedures of small joint arthroscopy. In: Watanabe M (ed) Arthroscopy of small joints. Tokyo, etc: Igaku-Shoin 5:3–37

  26. Bartlett DH (1988) Arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the first metatarsal head. Arthroscopy 4:51–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davies MS, Saxby TS (1999) Arthroscopy of the metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81B:203–206

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dijk Van et al (1998) Arthroscopic surgery of the metatarsophalangeal first joint. Arthroscopy 14(8):851–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Iqbal MJ et al (1998) Arthroscopic cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. Arthroscopy 14(3):307–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kutucu E et al (2017) Arthroscopic treatment of focal osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Orthop Surg Res 12:68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paczesny LM et al (2016) Ultrasound-guided arthroscopic management of hallux rigidus. Videosurgery Miniinv 11(3):144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aldegheri R et al (1994) Articulated distraction of the hip: conservative surgery for arthritis in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:94–101

    Google Scholar 

  33. Judet R et al (1978) The use of a hing distraction apparatus after arthrolysis and arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 64(5):353–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kluesner AJ et al (2009) Ankle arthrodiastasis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 26:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Talarico LM et al (2005) Management of hallux limitus with distraction of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(2):121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Valburg AA et al (1998) Beneficial effects of intermittent fluid pressure of low physiological magnitude on cartilage and inflammation in osteoarthritis. An in vivo study. J Rheumatol 25(3):515–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abraham JS et al (2012) Hinged external fixation distraction for treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(5):604–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramanujam CL et al (2012) First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodiastasis and biologic resurfacing with external fixation: a case report. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 29:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Inge GA et al (1933) Surgery of the sesamoid bones of the great toe. Arch Surg 27:466–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Saxena A et al (2016) Return to activity after sesamoidectomy in athletically active individuals. Foot Ankle Int 24(5):415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tagoe M et al (2009) Total sesamoidectomy for painful hallux rigidus: a medium-term outcome study. Foot Ankle Int 30(7):640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bonney G et al (1952) Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus: a critical survey of operative results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 34(3):366–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kessel L et al (1958) Hallux rigidus in the adolescent. J Bone Joint Surg Br 40(4):668–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Moberg E (1979) A simple operation for hallux rigidus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 142:55–56

    Google Scholar 

  45. Waizy H et al (2010) Mid- and long-term results of the joint preserving therapy of hallux ridigus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kilmartin TE (2005) Phalangeal osteotomy versus first metatarsal decompression osteotomy for the surgical treatment of hallux rigidus: a prospective study of age-matched and condition-matched patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 44:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Regnauld B (1986) The foot: pathology, aetiology, semiology, clinical investigation and therapy. In Elson R (ed) Springer, Berling, pp 335–350

  48. Quinn M et al (1990) Keller arthroplasty with autogenous bone graft in the treatment of hallux valgus. J Foot Surg 29(3):284–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Flavin R et al (2008) A finite-element analysis study of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the hallux rigidus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(10):1334–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Watermann H (1927) Die Arthritis Deformans des Grozehen-Grungelenkes als Selbstndiges Krankheitsbild. Z Orthop Chir 48:346–355

    Google Scholar 

  51. Youngswick FD (1982) Modifications of the Austin bunionectomy for treatment of metatarsus primus elevatus associated with hallux limitus. J Foot Surg 21(2):114–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gerbert J et al (2001) Youngswick-Austin procedure: the effect of plantar arm orientation on metatarsal head displacement. J Foot Ankle Surg 40(1):8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. LaMar L et al (2006) Mechanical comparison of the Youngswick, Sagittal V and modified Weil osteotomies for hallux rigidus in a sawbone model. J Foot Ankle Surg 45(2):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Oloff LM et al (2006) A retrospective analysis of joint salvage procedures for grades III and IV hallux rigidus. J Foot Ankle Surg 47:230–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Giannini S et al (2004) What’s new in surgical options for hallux rigidus? J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(2):72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Seibert NR et al (2009) Surgical management of hallux rigidus: cheilectomy and osteotomy (phalanx and metatarsal). Foot Ankle Clin 14:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Viegas GV (1998) Reconstruction of hallux limitus deformity using a first metatarsal sagittal-Z osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(3):204–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lundeen RO et al (2000) Sliding oblique osteotomy for the treatment of hallux abducto valgus associated with functional hallux limitus. J Foot Ankle Surg 39:161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ronconi et al (2000) Distal oblique osteotomy of the first metatarsal for the correction of hallux limitus and rigidus deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg 39(3):154–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Malerba et al (2008) Distal oblique first metatarsal osteotomy in grade III hallux rigidus: a long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 29:677–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Drago JJ et al (1984) A comprehensive review of hallux limitus. J Foot Ankle Surg 23:213–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Vannini F et al (2016) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus in athletes: what is the evidence? Joints 4(2):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Easley ME et al (2010) Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:616–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Debnath UK et al (2006) Indications for and technique of first metatarsal joint arthroscopy. Foot Ankle Int 27(12):1049–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mithofer K et al (2005) The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):1911–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mithoefer K et al (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37(10):2053–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Bojanic I et al (2011) Osteochondritis dissecans of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: arthroscopy and microfracture technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 50(5):623–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ritsila V et al (1994) Periosteal and perichondral grafting in reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:259–265

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jamora H et al (1987) Reconstruction on patellar cartilage defects with free periosteal grafts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 21:175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ritsila V et al (1992) Periosteal resurfacing of the metatarsal head in hallux rigidus and Freiberg’s disease. J Orthop Rheum 5:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  71. Giannini S et al (2005) Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus in young active patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):28–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Saris D et al (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36(2):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Marlovits S et al (2005) Early post-operative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(6):451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Brittberg M (2010) Cell carriers as the next generation of cell therapy for cartilage repair: a review of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure. Am J Sport Med 38(6):1259–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Baumhauer JF et al (2016) Prospective, randomized, multi-centered clinical trial assessing safety and efficacy of a synthetic cartilage implant versus first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in advanced hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 37(5):457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Dr. Maria Pia Cumani from Scuola di Disegno Anatomico, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute (Bologna, Italy) for artwork and figures. All Authors were fully involved in the study and the preparation of the manuscript, and the material within has not been and will not be submitted for publication elsewhere.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, 2nd Clinic of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bologna, Italy

    S. Caravelli, M. Mosca, S. Massimi, A. Russo, M. Fuiano, G. Catanese & S. Zaffagnini

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore “Pizzardi”, Bologna, Italy

    C. Pungetti

Authors
  1. S. Caravelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Mosca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Massimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Pungetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Fuiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G. Catanese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. Zaffagnini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Caravelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caravelli, S., Mosca, M., Massimi, S. et al. A comprehensive and narrative review of historical aspects and management of low-grade hallux rigidus: conservative and surgical possibilities. Musculoskelet Surg 102, 201–211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0530-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0530-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation