Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous treatment of hallux valgus: What’s the evidence? A systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hallux and first MTP joint have a fundamental role in the transfer of the weight-bearing load during the normal ambulation. The aim of this paper is to review and analyze the available literature about the percutaneous surgical management of the hallux valgus to highlight its strengths and weakness, also comparing with other minimal invasive techniques. A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases has been performed, covering the period between 1981 and 2016. Various combinations of the keyword terms “PDO,” “hallux valgus,” “bunion,” “percutaneous,” “surgery,” “non-invasive,” “minimal invasive,” “burr,” “osteotomy,” “distal,” “linear,” “saw” have been used.Four papers, published from 2005 to 2015, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 464 hallux valgus has been treated with a properly percutaneous distal first metatarsal osteotomy. Mean AOFAS score, retrieved from the 4 studies included in our review, has been recorded. There are different aspects that the foot and ankle non-experienced surgeon has to consider about percutaneous surgery: limitation of the tools, radioexposure, lack of direct visual control of the osteotomy and higher costs and patient risk due to surgical time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hueter C (1870) Klinik der Gelenkkrankheiten mit Einschluss der Orthopadie. Vogel, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nix S et al (2010) Prevalence of hallux valgus in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 3:21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Matteo B et al (2017) Art in science Mondino de’ Liuzzi: The restorer of anatomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1791–1795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maffulli N et al (2011) Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull 97:149–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Botezatu I et al (2015) Minimally invasive-percutaneous surgery—Recent developments of the foot surgery techniques. J Med Life 8:87–93

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer T et al (2009) Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: a prospective multicenter study of 189 cases. Orthop Clin N Am 40:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magnan B et al (2005) Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1191–1199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pichierri P et al (2014) Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: strengths and weakness in our clinical experience. Acta Biomed 85(Supplement 2):121–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Radwan YA et al (2012) Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy versus distal Chevron osteotomy for correction of mild-to-moderate hallux valgus deformity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1539–1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Isham SA (1991) The Reverdin-Isham procedure for the correction of hallux abducto valgus. A distal metatarsal osteotomy procedure. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 8(1):81–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Prado M et al (2003) Hallux valgus. In: Masson (ed) Cirurgia percutanea del pie. Masson (SA): Barcelona, pp 57–94

  12. Bösch P et al (1990) Technik und erste ergebnisse der subkutanen distalen metatarsale-I-osteotomie. Orthopädische Praxis 25:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bösch P et al (2000) Hallux valgus correction by the method of Bösch: a new technique with a seven-to-ten-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Clin 5:485–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giannini S et al (2003) Hallux valgus surgery: the minimally invasive bunion correction (SERI). Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giannini S et al (2013) A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI). Int Orthopaed (SICOT) 37:1805–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iannò B et al (2013) Midterm results and complications after minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 34(7):969–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daley BJ et al (2015) How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg April 220(4):550–558

  18. Piquè-Vidal C (2005) The effect of temperature elevation during discontinuous use of rotatory burrs in the correction on hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 44(5):336–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tehemar SH (1999) Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:127–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shahid MS et al (2012) A comparative study of bone shortening and bone loss with use of saw blades versus burr in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Surg 18:195–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Toth K et al (2007) The effect of first ray shortening in the development of metatarsalgia in the second through fourth rays after metatarsal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 28:61–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stephens MM (2006) Does shortening of the first ray in the treatment of adolescent hallux valgus prejudice the outcome? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:858–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim KP et al (2012) Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Health Phys 103(1):80–99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindsay C et al (2016) Breast radiation exposure in female orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(21):1808–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Caravelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caravelli, S., Mosca, M., Massimi, S. et al. Percutaneous treatment of hallux valgus: What’s the evidence? A systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 102, 111–117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0512-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0512-x

Keywords

Navigation