Abstract
The visible human body is composed of flesh and bones for the most part, yet an invisible orchestra of sensations and perceptions creates a virtual or phantom body that behaves like a shadow following every movement and gesture of its anatomical complement. This shadow becomes only “visible” to the individual when bodily integrity is affected, anatomically or cognitively. Phantom limbs have been known for a long time. They refer to the felt presence of a missing hand, leg, or other body part as if it was still in place. Reciprocally and of a supposedly cognitive origin, phantom extremities are reported by some patients that feel the virtual presence of a supernumerary limb – signifying anatomical “overcompleteness.” However, other patients feel as one of their limbs does not belong to their body – signifying “foreignness”. Various shades of the so-called body integrity identity disorder exemplify the assumed complex signification processes within the human body. The Peircean theory of signs and the Uexküllian concept of endosemiosis are combined to approach the still poorly understood phantom phenomena in light of representation and embodiment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Alviar, M. J. M., Hale, T., & Dungca, M. (2016). Pharmacologic interventions for treating phantom limb pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10(10), CD006380–CD006380. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006380.pub3.
Ambron, E., Buxbaum, L. J., Miller, A., Stoll, H., Kuchenbecker, K. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2021). Virtual reality treatment displaying the missing leg improves phantom limb pain: A small clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 35(12), 1100–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683211054164.
Amoruso, E., Kromm, M., Spampinato, D., Kop, B., Muret, D., Rothwell, J., & Makin, T. R. (2021). Stimulating the deprived motor ‘hand’ area causes facial muscle responses in one-handers. Brain Stimulation, 14(2), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.022.
Anderson, M. L. (2018). What phantom limbs are. Consciousness and Cognition, 64, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.001.
Andoh, J., Milde, C., Tsao, J. W., & Flor, H. (2018). Cortical plasticity as a basis of phantom limb pain: Fact or fiction? Neuroscience, 387, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.015.
Anghelescu, D. L., Kelly, C. N., Steen, B. D., Wu, J., Wu, H., DeFeo, B. M., & Burgoyne, L. (2016). Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain at a Pediatric Oncology Institution. Rehabilitation Oncology (American Physical Therapy Association Oncology Section), 34(3), 104–110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28163987.
Baars, B. G. (2010). NM. The brain. In Cognition, brain, and consciousness - Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123750709/cognition-brain-and-consciousness.
Barbin, J., Seetha, V., Casillas, J. M., Paysant, J., & Pérennou, D. (2016). The effects of mirror therapy on pain and motor control of phantom limb in amputees: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 59(4), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.04.001.
Beisheim, E. H., Pohlig, R. T., Medina, J., Hicks, G. E., & Sions, J. M. (2021). Body representation among adults with phantom limb pain: Results from a foot identification task. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1860.
Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(8), 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3292.
Blumberg, M. S., & Dooley, J. C. (2017). Phantom limbs, neuroprosthetics, and the developmental origins of embodiment. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(10), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.07.003
Bolognini, N., Russo, C., & Vallar, G. (2015). Crossmodal illusions in neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00212.
Boström, K. J., de Lussanet, M. H., Weiss, T., Puta, C., & Wagner, H. (2014). A computational model unifies apparently contradictory findings concerning phantom pain. Scientific Reports, 4, 5298. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05298.
Braun, N., Berisha, A., Anders, D., Kannen, K., Lux, S., & Philipsen, A. (2020). Experimental inducibility of supernumerary phantom limbs: A series of virtual reality experiments [Original Research]. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.00012
Brugger, P., Kollias, S. S., Müri, R. M., Crelier, G., Hepp-Reymond, M. C., & Regard, M. (2000). Beyond re-membering: Phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97(11), 6167–6172. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100510697.
Brugger, P., Lenggenhager, B., & Giummarra, M. J. (2013). Xenomelia: A social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204.
Bumbaširević, M., Lesic, A., Palibrk, T., Milovanovic, D., Zoka, M., Kravić-Stevović, T., & Raspopovic, S. (2020). The current state of bionic limbs from the surgeon’s viewpoint. EFORT Open Rev, 5(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.180038.
Candido Santos, L., Gushken, F., Gadotti, G. M., Dias, B. F., Pedrini, M., Barreto, S., & Fregni, M., F (2020). Intracortical inhibition in the affected hemisphere in limb amputation. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00720
Carruthers, G. (2008). Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001.
Catani, M. (2017). A little man of some importance. Brain, 140(11), 3055–3061. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx270.
Chakraborty, S., Saetta, G., Simon, C., Lenggenhager, B., & Ruddy, K. (2021). Could Brain–Computer interface be a new therapeutic approach for body integrity dysphoria? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 699830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.699830.
Chandler, D. (2022). Semiotics: The basics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Semiotics-The-Basics/Chandler/p/book/9780367726539.
Collins, K. L., Russell, H. G., Schumacher, P. J., Robinson-Freeman, K. E., O’Conor, E. C., Gibney, K. D., & Tsao, J. W. (2018). A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 128(6), 2168–2176. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci94003.
Corbett, M., South, E., Harden, M., Eldabe, S., Pereira, E., Sedki, I., & Woolacott, N. (2018). Brain and spinal stimulation therapies for phantom limb pain: A systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 22(62), 1–94. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta22620.
Corniani, G., & Saal, H. P. (2020). Tactile innervation densities across the whole body. Journal of Neurophysiology, 124(4), 1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00313.2020.
da Fonseca, I. B., da Fonseca, J. B., & Pereira, V. (2013). Beyond embodiment: From internal representation of action to symbolic processes. In L. Swan (Ed.), Origins of mind (pp. 187–199). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_9.
Deely, J. (2009). Basics of Semiotics (5 ed.). Tartu University.
Dhillon, G. S., Krüger, T. B., Sandhu, J. S., & Horch, K. W. (2005). Effects of short-term training on sensory and motor function in severed nerves of long-term human amputees. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(5), 2625–2633. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00937.2004.
Dietrich, C., Walter-Walsh, K., Preissler, S., Hofmann, G. O., Witte, O. W., Miltner, W. H., & Weiss, T. (2012). Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: Proof of a principle. Neuroscience Letters, 507(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.068.
Favareau, D. (2007). How to make Peirce’s ideas clear. In G. Witzany (Ed.), Biosemiotics in transdisciplinary contexts (pp. 163–173). Umweb.
Favareau, D. (2009). The logic of signs. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary (pp. 115–148). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1_3.
Feinberg, T. E. (2009). From axons to identity: Neurological explorations of the nature of the self. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. https://wwnorton.com/books/From-Axons-to-Identity.
Fontanille, J. (2013). Figures of the body and the semiotics of imprint: Semiotic figures of the body in the humanities. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 9(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2013-0104
Fornaro, S., Patrikelis, P., & Lucci, G. (2021). When having a limb means feeling overcomplete. Xenomelia, the chronic sense of disownership and the right parietal lobe hypothesis. Laterality, 26(5), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650x.2020.1866000.
Frith, C. D. (2007). Making up the mind: How the brain creates our mental world. Wiley Blackwell. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Making+up+the+Mind%3A+How+the+Brain+Creates+Our+Mental+World-p-9781405160223
Gahrn-Andersen, R., & Prinz, R. (2021). How cyborgs transcend Maturana’s concept of languaging: A (bio)engineering perspective on information processing and embodied cognition. RFIL, 15(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.4396/2021204.
Gahrn-Andersen, R., & Prinz, R. (2023). Ensuring wholeness: Using code biology to overcome the autonomy-heteronomy divide. Biosystems, 226, 104874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104874.
Gunduz, M. E., Pinto, C. B., Velez, S., Duarte, F. G., Pacheco-Barrios, D., Lopes, K., F., & Fregni, F. (2020). Motor cortex reorganization in limb amputation: A systematic review of TMS motor mapping studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00314
Hahamy, A., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Slater, H., Malach, D., Johansen-Berg, R., H., & Makin, T. R. (2015). Normalisation of brain connectivity through compensatory behaviour, despite congenital hand absence. Elife 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04605.
Hoffman, H. G., Boe, D. A., Rombokas, E., Khadra, C., LeMay, S., Meyer, W. J., & Pitt, S. W. (2020). Virtual reality hand therapy: A new tool for nonopioid analgesia for acute procedural pain, hand rehabilitation, and VR embodiment therapy for phantom limb pain. Journal of Hand Therapy, 33(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.04.001.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008a). BIOSEMIOTICS: An examination into the signs of life and life of signs. University of Scranton. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/B/bo5932926.html
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008b). The semiotic body. Biosemiotics, 1(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9015-3.
Huang, R. S., & Sereno, M. I. (2018). Multisensory and sensorimotor maps. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 151, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63622-5.00007-3.
Igamberdiev, A. U. (1992). Organization of biosystems: A semiotic approach. In Biosemiotics. The semiotic web 1991 (pp. 125–144). Mouton de Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871388-008/.
Jappy, T. (2023). Biosemiotics and peirce. Language and Semiotic Studies, 9(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0011.
Jarvis, L. (2019a). Body-swapping: Self-attribution and body transfer illusions (BTIs). In Immersive embodiment: Theatres of mislocalized sensation (pp. 99–157). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-27971-4
Jarvis, L. (2019b). Immersive embodiment: Theatres of mislocalized sensation. Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-27971-4.
Ji, S. (2018). The cell language theory - Connecting mind and matter. World Scientific. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/p758
Kandel, E. R., Koester, J. D., Mack, S. H., & Siegelbaum, S. A. (2021). Disorders of concious and unconcious mental processes. In Principles of neural science (pp. 1473–1487). McGraw Hill. https://neurology.mhmedical.com/book.aspx?bookID=3024.
Katayama, O., Iki, H., Sawa, S., Osumi, M., & Morioka, S. (2015). The effect of virtual visual feedback on supernumerary phantom limb pain in a patient with high cervical cord injury: A single-case design study. Neurocase, 21(6), 786–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2015.1011664.
Kaur, A., & Guan, Y. (2018). Phantom limb pain: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Traumatology = Zhonghua Chuang Shang Za Zhi / Chinese Medical Association, 21(6), 366–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.04.006.
Khateb, A., Simon, S. R., Dieguez, S., Lazeyras, F., Momjian-Mayor, I., Blanke, O., & Annoni, J. M. (2009). Seeing the phantom: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of a supernumerary phantom limb. Annals of Neurology, 65(6), 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21647.
Kim, H. R., Han, J. Y., Park, Y. H., Kim, B. J., Yang, W., & Kim, S. (2017). Supernumerary phantom limb in a patient with basal ganglia hemorrhage - a case report and review of the literature. Bmc Neurology, 17(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0962-7.
Kliemann, D., Adolphs, R., Tyszka, J. M., Fischl, B., Yeo, B. T. T., Nair, R., & Paul, L. K. (2019). Intrinsic functional connectivity of the brain in adults with a single cerebral hemisphere. Cell Rep, 29(8), 2398–2407e2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.067.
Kuffler, D. P. (2018a). Coping with phantom limb pain. Molecular Neurobiology, 55(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0718-9.
Kuffler, D. P. (2018b). Origins of phantom limb pain. Molecular Neurobiology, 55(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0717-x.
Kulkarni, J., Pettifer, S., Turner, S., & Richardson, C. (2020). An investigation into the effects of a virtual reality system on phantom limb pain: A pilot study. Br J Pain, 14(2), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463719859913.
Lim, R. (2017). Self and the phenomenon of life: A biologist examines life from molecules to humanity. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10347
Limakatso, K., Bedwell, G. J., Madden, V. J., & Parker, R. (2020). The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 15(10), e0240431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240431.
Limakatso, K., Ndhlovu, F., Usenbo, A., Rayamajhi, S., Kloppers, C., & Parker, R. (2024). The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain: A cross-sectional survey. Bmc Neurology, 24(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03547-w.
Longo, M. R. (2020). Body image: Neural basis of ‘negative’ phantom limbs. Current Biology, 30(11), R644–r646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.006
Longo, M. R., Azañón, E., & Haggard, P. (2010). More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.022.
Magsino, M. A. L. (2021). A biosemiotic modeling of the body-self synechism. In A. Asun López-Varela (Ed.), Mind and matter (pp. Ch. 4). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100037.
Major, J. C. (2021). Archetypes and code biology. Biosystems, 208, 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104501.
Makin, T. R. (2021). Phantom limb pain: Thinking outside the (mirror) box. Brain, 144(7), 1929–1932. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab139.
Makin, T. R., Scholz, J., Filippini, N., Henderson Slater, D., Tracey, I., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2013). Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nature Communications, 4, 1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2571.
Malavera, A., Silva, F. A., Fregni, F., Carrillo, S., & Garcia, R. G. (2016). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for phantom limb pain in land mine victims: A double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 17(8), 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.05.003
Muret, D., & Makin, T. R. (2021). The homeostatic homunculus: Rethinking deprivation-triggered reorganisation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 67, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.08.008.
Murray, C. D. (2004). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(16), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001696764.
Murray, C. D. (2005). The social meanings of prosthesis use. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305051431
Murray, C. (2010). Amputation, prosthesis use, and phantom limb pain: An interdisciplinary perspective. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-87462-3.
Oddo, S., Thiel, A., Skoruppa, S., Klinger, D., Steis, N., Markowitsch, H. J., & Stirn, A. (2009). Neurobiological and psychological aspects of BIID - an integrative approach. In A. Stirn, S. Thiel, & S. Oddo (Eds.), Body integrity identity disorder: Psychological, neurobiological, ethical and legal aspects. Pabst Science Publishers. https://www.pabst-sciencepublishers.com/shop-checkout/detailview.html?tt_products%5BbackPID%5D=21&tt_products%5Bsword%5D=Body%20Integrity%20Identity%20Disorder&tt_products%5Bproduct%5D=225&cHash=5ff7cb018ce976131a954308dcf8b540
Osumi, M., Ichinose, A., Sumitani, M., Wake, N., Sano, Y., Yozu, A., & Morioka, S. (2017). Restoring movement representation and alleviating phantom limb pain through short-term neurorehabilitation with a virtual reality system. European Journal of Pain, 21(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.910.
Osumi, M., Inomata, K., Inoue, Y., Otake, Y., Morioka, S., & Sumitani, M. (2018). Characteristics of phantom limb pain alleviated with virtual reality rehabilitation. Pain Medicine, 20(5), 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny269
Pain, S. P. (2007). Inner representations and signs in animals. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics - The new biological synthesis (pp. 409–455). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9.
Pazzaglia, M., & Molinari, M. (2016). The embodiment of assistive devices—from wheelchair to exoskeleton. Physics of Life Reviews, 16, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.11.006.
Pourmand, A., Davis, S., Marchak, A., Whiteside, T., & Sikka, N. (2018). Virtual reality as a clinical tool for pain management. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 22(8), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0708-2
Purves, D. (2021). Why brains don’t compute. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71064-4.
Raffin, E., Giraux, P., & Reilly, K. T. (2012). The moving phantom: Motor execution or motor imagery? Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 48(6), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.003.
Raffin, E., Mattout, J., Reilly, K. T., & Giraux, P. (2012b). Disentangling motor execution from motor imagery with the phantom limb. Brain, 135(Pt 2), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr337.
Raffin, E., Richard, N., Giraux, P., & Reilly, K. T. (2016). Primary motor cortex changes after amputation correlate with phantom limb pain and the ability to move the phantom limb. Neuroimage, 130, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.063.
Raggi, A., & Ferri, R. (2019). Phantom restless legs syndrome. European Neurology, 81(5–6), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503103.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121(Pt 9), 1603–1630. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.9.1603.
Razmus, M., Daniluk, B., & Markiewicz, P. (2017). Phantom limb phenomenon as an example of body image distortion. Current Problems of Psychiatry, 18(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/cpp-2017-0013.
Ronchi, R., Bassolino, M., Viceic, D., Bellmann, A., Vuadens, P., Blanke, O., & Vallar, G. (2020). Disownership of body parts as revealed by a visual scale evaluation. An observational study. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107337.
Root, V., Muret, D., Arribas, M., Amoruso, E., Thornton, J., Tarall-Jozwiak, A., & Makin, T. R. (2022). Complex pattern of facial remapping in somatosensory cortex following congenital but not acquired hand loss. Elife 11. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76158.
Rossini, P. M., Micera, S., Benvenuto, A., Carpaneto, J., Cavallo, G., Citi, L., & Dario, P. (2010). Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(5), 777–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.001.
Saetta, G., Hänggi, J., Gandola, M., Zapparoli, L., Salvato, G., Berlingeri, M., & Brugger, P. (2020). Neural correlates of body integrity dysphoria. Current Biology, 30(11), 2191–2195e2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.001
Sattin, D., Parma, C., Lunetta, C., Zulueta, A., Lanzone, J., Giani, L., & Parati, E. A. (2023). An overview of the body Schema and body image: Theoretical models, methodological settings and pitfalls for rehabilitation of persons with neurological disorders. Brain Sci, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101410.
Scaliti, E., Gruppioni, E., & Becchio, C. (2020). And yet it moves: What we currently know about phantom arm movements. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 26(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420904326
Sebeok, T. A. (1992). ‘Tell me, where is fancy bred?‘: The biosemiotic self. In T. A. Seboek, J. Umiker-Seboek, & E. P. Young (Eds.), Biosemiotics: The biosemiotics web 1991 (pp. 333–343). Mouton de Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871388/html.
Steiner, R. (1911). Von Jesus zu Christus: Ein Zyklus von zehn Vorträgen mit einem vorangehenden öffentlichen Vortrag gehalten in Karlsruhe vom 4. bis 14. Oktober– 1911 SECHSTER VORTRAG Karlsruhe, 10. Oktober 1911 (7 ed.). Rudolf Steiner Ausgaben. https://www.steinerverlag.com/ch/rudolf-steiner-gesamtausgabe/vortraege-zur-allgemeinen-anthroposophie/von-jesus-zu-christus (1988).
Stirn, A., Thiel, S., & Oddo, S. (2009). Body integrity identity disorder: Psychological, neurobiological, ethical and legal aspects (A. Stirn, S. Thiel, & S. Oddo, Eds.). Papst Science Publishers. https://www.pabst-science-publishers.com/shop-checkout/detailview.html?tt_products%5BbackPID%5D=21&tt_products%5Bsword%5D=Body%20Integrity%20Identity%20Disorder&tt_products%5Bproduct%5D=225&cHash=5ff7cb018ce976131a954308dcf8b540
Stjernfelt, F. (2006). The semiotic body. A semiotic concept of embodiment? In W. Nöth (Ed.), Semiotic bodies, aestethic embodiments, and cyberbodies (pp. 13–48). Kassel University Press. https://portal.ub.uni-kassel.de/kup/d/9783899581430.
Stover, G., & Prahlow, N. (2020). Residual limb pain: An evidence-based review. Neurorehabilitation, 47(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-208005.
Talsma, D. (2023). Mechanical Perception. In The psychology of cognition: An introduction to cognitive neuroscience (pp. 223–251). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Psychology-of-Cognition-An-Introduction-to-Cognitive-Neuroscience/Talsma/p/book/9781032333618.
Tatu, L., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2018). Phantom sensations, supernumerary phantom limbs and apotemnophilia: Three body representation disorders. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, 41, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000475684
Thibault, P. J. (2006). Brain, mind and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/brain-mind-and-the-signifying-body-9781441171184/.
Tzvi, E., Loens, S., & Donchin, O. (2022). Mini-review: The role of the cerebellum in visuomotor adaptation. Cerebellum, 21(2), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-021-01281-4
Umezawa, K., Suzuki, Y., Ganesh, G., & Miyawaki, Y. (2022). Bodily ownership of an independent supernumerary limb: An exploratory study. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06040-x.
Vaso, A., Adahan, H. M., Gjika, A., Zahaj, S., Zhurda, T., Vyshka, G., & Devor, M. (2014). Peripheral nervous system origin of phantom limb pain. Pain, 155(7), 1384–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.018.
Vignemont, F., Pitron, V., & Alsmith, A. J. T. (2021). What is the body schema? In Y. Ataria, S. Tanaka, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Body schema and body image: New directions (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851721.003.0001
Vitacco, D., Hilti, L., & Brugger, P. (2009). Negative phantom limbs? A neurological account of body integrity identity disorder. In A. Stirn, S. Thiel, & S. Oddo (Eds.), Body integrity identity disorder: Psychological, neurobiological, ethical and legal aspects. Pabst Science Publishers. https://www.pabst-science-publishers.com/shop-checkout/detailview.html?tt_products%5BbackPID%5D=21&tt_products%5Bsword%5D=Body%20Integrity%20Identity%20Disorder&tt_products%5Bproduct%5D=225&cHash=5ff7cb018ce976131a954308dcf8b540
von Uexküll, J. (1921). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. In F. Mildenberger & B. Herrmann (Eds.), Uexküll - Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Springer Spektrum 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41700-9.
von Uexküll, T., Geigges, W., & Herrmann, J. M. (1993). Endosemiosis Semiotica, 96(1–2), 5–52. https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/semi/96/1-2/html
Wang, F., Zhang, R., Zhang, J., Li, D., Wang, Y., Yang, Y. H., & Wei, Q. (2021). Effects of mirror therapy on phantom limb sensation and phantom limb pain in amputees: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2692155211027332. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155211027332.
Wittkopf, P. G., & Johnson, M. I. (2017). Mirror therapy: A potential intervention for pain management. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 63(11), 1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1000.
Wittkopf, P. G., Lloyd, D. M., & Johnson, M. I. (2019). Managing limb pain using virtual reality: A systematic review of clinical and experimental studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(26), 3103–3117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1485183.
Zahedi, K. (2012). Body parts in language: A cognitive semiosis of human mind. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.049.
Acknowledgements
I thank Kalevi Kull and the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions that helped me further improving the article.
Funding
No funding was received for this work. The author declares no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The manuscript was written by the author. All figures were prepared by the author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Prinz, R. Phantom Signs – Hidden (Bio)Semiosis in the Human Body(?). Biosemiotics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09556-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09556-z