Skip to main content
Log in

The Birth and Life of Species–Cultures

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolution and life phenomena can be understood as results of history, i.e., as outcomes of cohabitation and collective memory of populations of autonomous entities (individuals) across many generations and vast extent of time. Hence, evolution of distinct lineages of life can be considered as isomorphic with that of cultures. I argue here that cultures and culture-like systems – human culture, natural languages, and life forms – always draw from history, memory, experience, internal dynamics, etc., transforming themselves creatively into new patterns, never foreseen before. This is possible thanks to the fact that all forms of life are descendants of life. Ontogeny and speciation in various lineages draw from continuous re-interpretation of conservative genetic/generic “texts”, as well as from changes of the interpretative process itself. The result is continuous appearances of new lineages-cultures and/or communities-cultures, in a semiotic process of re-interpretation and inventing new ways of living. The topic is developed here on the backgrounds of ideas presented by R. A. Rappaport in “Ritual and religion in the making of humanity” and J. Flegr in “Frozen evolution”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As to differences between complex systems (i) born and (ii) emerging de novo, see Markoš and Das (2016).

References

  • Allis, C. D., Jenuwein, T., & Reinberg, D. (2007). Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1971). The poetics of reverie. Childhood, language, and the cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2008). Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577–599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2011). A mechanistic model of meaning. Biosemiotics, 4, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1995). The search for the perfect language. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flegr, J. (2008). Frozen evolution, or, that’s not the way it is, Mr Darwin. Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2008). Ecological developmental biology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallgrímsson, B., & Hall, B. K. (Eds.). (2011). Epigenetics. Linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2001). Rethinking writing. The tyranny of alphabet and how to escape from it. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009). Rationality and the literate mind. New York: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1995 [1982]). The fundamental concepts of metaphysics. World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Hesse, H. (1990 [1943]). The glass bead game (Magister ludi). New York: Henry Holt & Co.

  • Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komárek, S. (2009). Nature and culture. The world of phenomena and the world of interpretation. München: LINCOM publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Theses on biosemiotics: prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922). Der Begriff der Genese in Physik, Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Berlin: Julius Springler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1966). On agression. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman YM (2009 [1992]) Culture and explosion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 2009.

  • Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the book of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A. (2010). Biosemiotics and the collision of modernism with the postmodernity. Cognitio (Sao Paulo), 11, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A. (2014). Biosphere as semiosphere: variations on Lotman. Sign Systems Studies, 42, 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., & Faltýnek, D. (2011). Language metaphors of life. Biosemiotics, 4, 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., & Faltýnek, D. (2015). Language and biosphere: Blurry contours as a condition of semiosis. In E. Velmezova, S. Cowley, & K. Kull (Eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and Linguistics (pp. 29–45). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., & Švorcová, J. (2009). Recorded versus organic memory. Biosemiotics, 2, 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoš, A., Grygar, F., Hajnal, L., Kleisner, K., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer: Darwin’s origin and western thought. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pátková, I., Čepl, J. J., Blahůšková, A., Neubauer, Z., & Markoš, A. (2012). Developmental plasticity of bacterial colonies and consortia in germ-free and gnotobiotic settings. BMC Microbiology, 12, 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (2010 [1999]). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schmalhausen, I. I. (1986 [1946]). Factors of evolution. The theory of stabilizing selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1994). Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taipale, M., Jarosz, D. F., & Lindquist, S. (2010). HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 11, 515–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Czech Science Foundation 13-24275S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Markoš.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markoš, A. The Birth and Life of Species–Cultures. Biosemiotics 9, 73–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1

Keywords

Navigation