Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Errors in the Extra-Analytical Phases of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Testing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total testing process consists of various phases from the pre-preanalytical to the post-postanalytical phase, the so-called brain-to-brain loop. With improvements in analytical techniques and efficient quality control programmes, most laboratory errors now occur in the extra-analytical phases. There has been recent interest in these errors with numerous publications highlighting their effect on service delivery, patient care and cost. This interest has led to the formation of various working groups whose mission is to develop standardized quality indicators which can be used to measure the performance of service of these phases. This will eventually lead to the development of external quality assessment schemes to monitor these phases in agreement with ISO15189:2012 recommendations. This review focuses on potential errors in the extra-analytical phases of clinical chemistry laboratory testing, some of the studies performed to assess the severity and impact of these errors and processes that are in place to address these errors. The aim of this review is to highlight the importance of these errors for the requesting clinician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA. 1981;245:1762–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1131–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lord Carter. Report of the review of NHS pathology services in England—chaired by Lord Carter of Coles 2006. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/ab/Archive/IRNHSPS/index.htm Accessed 23 Aug 2014.

  4. Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1348–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Konhe LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plebani M, Lippi G. To err is human. To misdiagnose might be deadly. Clin Biochem. 2010;43:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. The pathology request-test-report cycle—guidelines for requesters and pathology providers. http://www.rcpa.edu.au/static/File/Asset%20library/public%20Manual/Guidelines/The%20Pathology%20Request-Test-Report%20Cycle.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2015.

  9. Simundic A, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase—a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med. 2012;22:145–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Daves M, Dolci A, et al. Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:728–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1113–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Narayanan S, Guder WG. Preanalytical variables and their influence on the quality of laboratory results. eJIFCC, vol 13 no 1, http://www.ifcc.org/ejifcc/vol13no1/1301200107.htm. Accessed 15 July 2015.

  13. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Pelloso M, Chiozza ML. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:943–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plebani M, Laposata M, Lundberg GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:829–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sonntag O. Quality in the analytical phase. Biochem Med. 2010;20:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Plebani M, Lippi G. Improving the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:435–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, Cornes M, De Carli G, Grankvist K, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:357–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carraro P, Zago T, Plebani M. Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytical errors. Clin Chem. 2012;53:638–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lundberg GD. Adding outcome as the 10th step in the brain-to-brain laboratory test loop. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;141:767–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laposata M, Dighe A. “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:712–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;213:71–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth J, Panteghini M. Harmonization of laboratory testing—current achievements and future strategies. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:4–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Misra S, Barth JH. How good is the evidence base for test selection in clinical guidelines? Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fryer AA, Hanna FW. Managing demand for pathology tests: financial imperative or duty of care? Ann Clin Biochem. 2009;46:435–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Janssens PMW. Managing the demand for laboratory testing: options and opportunities. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1596–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lang T. Laboratory demand management of repetitive testing—time for harmonisation and an evidence based approach. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:1139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fryer AA, Smellie WSA. Managing demand for laboratory tests: a laboratory toolkit. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smellie WSA. Demand management and test request rationalization. Ann Clin Biochem. 2012;49:323–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smit I, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT. Demand management: an audit of chemical pathology test rejections by an electronic gate-keeping system at an academic hospital in Cape Town. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52:481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Carli G, Abiteboul D, Puro V. The importance of implementing safe sharps practices in the laboratory setting in Europe. Biochem Med. 2014;24:45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lippi G, Guidi GC. Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:720–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller WG, Tate JR, Barth JH, Jones GR. Harmonization: the sample, the measurement, and the report. Ann Lab Med. 2014;34:187–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Green SF. The cost of poor blood specimen quality and errors in preanalytical processes. Clin Biochem. 2013;46:1175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Plumhoff EA, Masoner D, Dale JD. Preanalytic laboratory errors: identification and prevention. Mayo Clin Commun. 2008;33:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Atay A, Demir L, Cuhadar S, Saglam G, Unal H, Aksun S, et al. Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors. Biochem Med. 2014;24:376–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:764–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobsz LA, Zemlin AE, Roos MJ, Erasmus RT. Chemistry and haematology sample rejection and clinical impact in a tertiary laboratory in Cape Town. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:2047–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nikolac N. Lipaemia: causes, interference mechanisms, detection and management. Biochem Med. 2014;24:57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lippi G, Daves M, Mattiuzzi C. Interference of medical contrast media on laboratory testing. Biochem Med. 2014;24:80–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Miler M, Simundic AM. Low level of adherence to instructions for 24-hour urine collection among hospital outpatients. Biochem Med. 2013;23:316–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Delanghe J, Speeckaert M. Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis. Biochem Med. 2014;24:89–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Procedures for collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture; approved guideline—6th ed. CLSI document H3–A6. CLSI:Wayne, PA, 2007.

  43. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sanchis-Gomar F, Lippi G. Physical activity—an important preanalytical variable. Biochem Med. 2014;24:68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M. Standardization of collection requirements for fasting samples For the Working Group on Preanalytical Phase (WG-PA) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Narayanan S. The preanalytical phase. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:429–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Plebani M. Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:700–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hammerling JA. A review of medical errors in laboratory diagnostics and where we are today. Lab Med. 2012;43:41–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vasikaran SD, Lai LC, Sethi S, Lopez JB, Sikaris KA. Quality of interpretative commenting on common clinical chemistry results in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:963–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Haeckel R, Wosniok W. Quantity quotient reporting. A proposal for a standardized presentation of laboratory results. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1203–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ceriotti F. Quantity quotient reporting. Counterpoint. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1207–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zemlin AE, Nutt L, Burgess LJ, Eiman F, Erasmus RT. Potential for medical error: incorrectly completed request forms for thyroid function tests limit pathologists’ advice to clinicians. S Afr Med J. 2009;99:668–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. MLO Med Lab Obs. 1972;4:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Campbell CA, Horvath AR. Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:135–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nutt L, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT. Incomplete laboratory request forms: the extent and impact on critical results at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:463–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rensburg MA, Nutt L, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT. An audit on the reporting of critical results in a tertiary institute. Ann Clin Biochem. 2009;46:162–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chima HS, Ramarajan V, Bhansali D. Is it necessary to repeat critical values in the laboratory?: today’s technology may have the answers. Lab Med. 2009;40:453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Toll AD, Liu MJ, Gulati G, Behling EM, Kocher WD. Does routine repeat testing of critical values offer any advantage over single testing? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:440–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Onyenekwu CP, Hudson CL, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT. The impact of repeat-testing of common chemistry analytes at critical concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:1739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rustad P, Felding P, Franzson L, Kairisto V, Lahti A, Mårtensson A, et al. The Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000: recommended reference intervals for 25 common biochemical properties. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004;64:271–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jones GD, Barker T. Reference intervals. Clin Biochem 2013; 29 (Suppl. S93–7).

  62. Yamamoto Y, Hosogaya S, Osawa S, Ichihara K, Onuma T, Saito A, et al. Nationwide multicentre study aimed at the establishment of common reference intervals for standardized clinical laboratory tests in Japan. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:1663–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sturgeon CM. Common decision limits—the need for harmonised immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Smith BR, Aguero-Rosenfeld M, Anastasi J, Baron B, Berg A, Bock JL, et al. Educating medical students in laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:533–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sandhaus LM. Brain-to-brain turnaround loop. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:1012–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hawkins R. Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32:5–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Padoan A, Chiozza ML. Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:44–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Marinova M, Marcuccitti J, Chiozza ML. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a fundamental tool for quality and patient safety. Clin Biochem. 2013;46:1170–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Plebani M, Chiozza ML, Sciacovelli L. Towards harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sciacovelli L, O’Kane M, Skaik YA, Caciagli P, Pellegrini C, Da Rin G, et al. IFCC WG-LEPS. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:835–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Salinas M, López-Garrigós M, Flores E, Santo-Quiles A, Gutierrez M, Lugo J, et al. Ten years of preanalytical monitoring and control: synthetic balanced score card indicator. Biochem Med. 2015;25:49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189: medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: IOS; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  73. http://www.rcpaqap.com.au/kimms/. Accessed 12 Aug 2015.

  74. Cornes M, Atherton J, Pourmahram G, Borthwick H, Kyle B, West J, et al. Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine; the UK situation. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kristensen GB, Aakre KM, Kristoffersen AH, Sandberg S. How to conduct external quality assessment schemes for the pre-analytical phase? Biochem Med. 2014;24:114–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Erasmus RT, Zemlin AE. Clinical audit in the laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:593–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Favaloro E. Pre-analytical variability and quality of diagnostic testing. Looking at the moon and gazing beyond the finger. N Z J Med Lab Sci. 2015;69:04–8.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vanker N, van Wyk J, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT. A six sigma approach to the rate and clinical effect of registration errors in a laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) and University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa

    Annalise E. Zemlin

Authors
  1. Annalise E. Zemlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalise E. Zemlin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The author declares that he/she has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zemlin, A.E. Errors in the Extra-Analytical Phases of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Testing. Ind J Clin Biochem 33, 154–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-017-0657-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-017-0657-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation