Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography without clinical breast examination among Japanese women aged 40–49 years: analysis of data from the J-START results

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Current breast cancer screening programs worldwide offer only mammography for asymptomatic women, without clinical breast examination (CBE). The sensitivity and specificity of true asymptomatic screening mammography are important, especially in Japan.

Methods

This study used data from the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START) results, and then calculated the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography without CBE among Japanese women aged 40–49 years.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of modern film mammography, performed biennially, among Japanese women aged 40–49 years were 71.7% and 92.6%, respectively. The sensitivity of mammography alone was 47.4%. From the secondary analysis, the sensitivity of mammography alone was 44.1% for women with dense breasts and 34.8% for women with non-dense breasts.

Conclusion

The sensitivity of mammography alone of 47.4% is too low. The low sensitivity of screening mammography for true asymptomatic Japanese women aged 40–49 years places this population at an elevated risk, which can justify performing adjunctive ultrasonography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Volume 15, Breast Cancer Screening. https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Handbooks-Of-Cancer-Prevention/Breast-Cancer-Screening-2016. Accessed 10 December 2021.

  2. Uematsu T. The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uematsu T. Risk-stratified breast cancer screening. JAMA Netw Open. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2783182. Accessed 10 December 2021.

  4. Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T, Kawai M, Yamamoto S, Zheng YF, J-START Investigator Group, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:341–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harada-Shoji N, Suzuki A, Ishida T, Zheng YF, Narikawa-Shiono Y, Sato-Tadano A, et al. Evaluation of adjunctive ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among women aged 40–49 years with varying breast density undergoing screening mammography: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2121505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donnelly LF. Fifty-three cases of carcinoma of the breast: occult until mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hollingsworth A, Morse AN. Historical origins for the overestimation of mammographic sensitivity. Cureus. 2021;13:e15940.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Houssami N, Hunter K. The epidemiology, radiology and biological characteristics of interval breast cancers in population mammography screening. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017;3:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohnuki K, Tohno E, Tsunoda H, Uematsu T, Nakajima Y. Overall assessment system of combined mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2021;28:254–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uematsu T, Nakamura S, Ohuchi N. Do you know how to get the J-START quality assurance guideline? Breast Cancer. 2018;25:375–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishida T, Suzuki A, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Saito H, Yamamoto S, et al. A randomized controlled trial to verify the efficacy of the use of ultrasonography in breast cancer screening aged 40–49 (J-START): 76 196 women registered. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:134–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sprague BL, Conant EF, Onega T, Garcia MP, Beaber EF, Herschorn SD, et al. Variation in mammographic breast density assessments among radiologists in clinical practice: a multicenter observational study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:457–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizukoshi MM, Hossian SZ, Poulos A. Mammographic breast density of Japanese Women living in Australia: implications for breast screening policy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:2811–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaguchi T, Inoue K, Tsunoda H, Uematsu T, Shinohara N, Mukai H. A deep learning-based automated diagnostic system for classifying mammographic lesions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e20977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the J-START researchers and sincerely thank their staff for their efforts in collecting and monitoring the morbidity database. The content in this article is solely responsibility of the author and the views of the author do not necessarily represent those of the J-START researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayoshi Uematsu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The author has no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uematsu, T. Sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography without clinical breast examination among Japanese women aged 40–49 years: analysis of data from the J-START results. Breast Cancer 29, 928–931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01353-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01353-1

Keywords

Navigation