Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of breast density on breast cancer risk: a case control study in Japanese women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mammography is the standard examination for breast cancer screening of woman aged ≥ 40 years. High breast density on mammography indicates that mammary gland parenchyma occupy a high percentage of the breast. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with breast density and the risk of high breast density for breast cancer.

Methods

A multicenter case–control study was performed in 530 patients and 1043 controls. Breast density was classified as C1–C4 using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Clinical factors were obtained from questionnaires or medical records, and the influence of each factor (breast density, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), parity, presence or absence of breastfeeding history, age at menarche, age at first birth, and familial history of breast cancer) on breast cancer risk in all patients was calculated as an age-adjusted odds ratio (OR). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then performed in all patients and in pre- and postmenopausal and BMI-stratified groups using factors with a significant age-adjusted OR as adjustment factors.

Results

Age-adjusted ORs for breast cancer were significant for breast density, BMI, parity, and breast feeding, but not for age at menarche, age at first birth, or family history of breast cancer. In multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between breast density and breast cancer in postmenopausal women (OR for C1 vs. C2 1.90 [95% CI 1.34–2.70]; C1 vs. C4 2.85 [95% CI 1.10–7.16]). This correlation was also significant in patients in the third BMI quartile (22.3–24.5 kg/m2) (OR for C1 vs. C4 8.76 [95% CI 2.38–42.47]); and fourth BMI quartile (>24.5 kg/m2) (OR for C1 vs. C2 1.92 [95% CI 1.17–3.15]; C1 vs. C4 11.89 [95% CI 1.56–245.17]).

Conclusion

Breast density on mammography is a risk factor for breast cancer after adjustment for other risk factors. This risk is particularly high in postmenopausal women and those with a high BMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42:793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS®-Mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Ragiology; 2013. pp 181–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack VA, dos Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotsuma Y, Tamaki Y, Nishimura T, Tsubai M, Ueda S, Shimazu K, et al. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women. Breast. 2008;17:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagao Y, Kawaguchi Y, Sugiyama Y, Saji S, Kashiki Y. Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:228–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, Nagao Y, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2102–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL, Ingman WV, Henderson MA, Hopper JL, et al. Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:479–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taira N, Arai M, Ikeda M, Iwasaki M, Okamura H, Takamatsu K, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines for epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer, 2015 edition. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:343–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, Duffy S, Luben R, Day N. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1257–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishihara S, Taira N, Kawasaki K, Ishibe Y, Mizoo T, Nishiyama K, et al. Association between mammographic breast density and lifestyle in Japanese women. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67:145–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uematsu T. The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, Olshan AF, Yankaskas BC, Millikan RC. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in White and African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:571–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1087–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, Santos Silva ID, McCormack V, Baglietto L, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wada K, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Matsuo K, Oze I, Wakai K, et al. Body mass index and breast cancer risk in Japan: a pooled analysis of eight population-based cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:519–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. WCRFAIfC. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wong CS, Lim GH, Gao F, Jakes RW, Offman J, Chia KS, et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:871–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naruto Taira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain studies on animals.

Informed consent

All subjects and controls gave written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishiyama, K., Taira, N., Mizoo, T. et al. Influence of breast density on breast cancer risk: a case control study in Japanese women. Breast Cancer 27, 277–283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01018-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01018-6

Keywords

Navigation