Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving the energy production of roof-top solar PV systems through roof design

  • Research Article
  • Architecture and Human Behavior
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Australia is receiving an average of 58 million PJ of solar radiation per year, which is about 1000 times larger than its total energy generation. Roof-top solar photovoltaic (PV) systems alone can supply a phenomenal fraction of the nation’s total energy. The architectural design and orientation of roofs have considerable impacts on the energy efficiency of roof-top solar PV systems. These aspects, however, have received scant academic attention within the literature. To address this knowledge gap, this research seeks to increase the energy production of roof-top solar PV systems through roof design. The energy generation of roof-top solar PV systems is modelled using Helioscope software, and then validated using real-time monitored data. Based on the verified model, the impact of different tilt angles and shading from surrounding obstructions upon energy generation are analyzed in detail. To ground the research in practical terms, the aesthetic design of five typical roof design patterns (including flat, shed, gable, hip, and butterfly roof) are explored to compare the energy generated from solar PV systems fitted to each design. Findings indicate that: (1) the simulated energy generation from the solar PV system is close to the monitored data, with equal annual generation; (2) the shading of surrounding obstructions can reduce the energy generation of roof-top solar PV systems considerably, where up to 24% energy loss is reported; (3) the optimal tilt angle is about 35°, which is close to the latitude angle of the studied location; and (4) the shed roof design provides the maximum potential for solar energy generation when compared to that of other roof design patterns. The energy generation variation of other aesthetic roof patterns is also presented, providing support for informed decision making on the roof design. This study contributes to the field through improving the energy production of roof-top solar PV systems based on roof design along with considering aesthetic concerns. Novel insights generated will be beneficial for researchers and government policy makers alike; the work also introduces simulation-based methodological approaches for practitioners who seek to improve the energy generation of roof-top solar PV systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad MJ, Tiwari GN (2009). Optimization of tilt angle for solar collector to receive maximum radiation. The Open Renewable Energy Journal, 2009(2): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Bhuiyan M, Rashid Khan HU, Zaman K, Hishan SS (2018). Measuring the impact of global tropospheric ozone, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide concentrations on biodiversity loss. Environmental Research, 160: 398–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhusayni S (2017). Cost benefit analysis of PV and storage installation at Murdoch University. Honours Thesis, Murdoch University, Australia. Available at https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/36733/1/ENG470%20Alhusayni%20Honours%20Thesis.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Household Energy Consumption Survey, Australia: Summary of Results. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4670.0main+features100052012.2014.04.029

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standards Institution (2013). BS 6229:2003 Flat Roofs with Continuously Supported Coverings-Code of Practice, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito MC, Gomes N, Santos T, Tenedório JA (2012). Photovoltaic potential in a Lisbon suburb using LiDAR data. Solar Energy, 86: 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Kyttä M (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46: 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulliet RW, Hirsch SW, Johnson LL, Crossley PK, Headrick DR, Northrup D (2018). The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History, 7th edn. London: Cengage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger B, Rüther R (2006). Inverter sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the light of local solar resource distribution characteristics and temperature. Solar Energy, 80: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne J, Taminiau J, Kurdgelashvili L, Kim KN (2015). A review of the solar city concept and methods to assess rooftop solar electric potential, with an illustrative application to the city of Seoul. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 830–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron PC, Boyson WE, Riley DM (2008). Comparison of PV system performance-model predictions with measured PV system performance. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro C, Morello E, Voegtle T, Golay F (2010). Digital urban morphometrics: automatic extraction and assessment of morphological properties of buildings. Transactions in GIS, 14: 497–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HY, Riffat SB, Zhu J (2010). Review of passive solar heating and cooling technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14: 781–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Hao Q, Yoon C (2018). Measuring the welfare cost of air pollution in Shanghai: evidence from the housing market. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61: 1744–1757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DR, Klein SA, Beckman WA (1984). A method for estimating the performance of photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 33: 551–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan H, Smith P (2004). Dictionary of Architectural and Building Technology, 4th edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DB (1998). Which weather data should you use for energy simulations of commercial buildings? ASHRAE Transactions, 104(2): 498–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook JA, Jones LA, Forster PM, Crook R (2011). Climate change impacts on future photovoltaic and concentrated solar power energy output. Energy & Environmental Science, 4: 3101–3109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl JS, Wilson S (2006). Oxford Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, 2nd edn. Oxford: UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalu MTB, Shackleton CM, Dalu T (2018). Influence of land cover, proximity to streams and household topographical location on flooding impact in informal settlements in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28: 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darhmaoui H, Lahjouji D (2013). Latitude based model for tilt angle optimization for solar collectors in the mediterranean region. Energy Procedia, 42: 426–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32: 480–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013). Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn C, Kennedy T (2018). Australia’s Energy Future—A Shift to Rooftop Solar. Available at https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/australias-energy-future-shift-rooftop-solar

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoscience Australia (2010). Australian Energy Resource Assessment. Available at https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/energy/resources/other-renewable-energy-resources/solar-energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Kulkarni M (2005). Design optimization of a large scale rooftop photovoltaic system. Solar Energy, 78: 362–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostein M, Caron JR, Littmann B (2014). Measuring soiling losses at utility-scale PV power plants. In: Proceedings of IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami DY, Kreith F, Kreider JF (2000). Principles of Solar Engineering. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green MA, Emery K, Hishikawa Y, Warta W (2010). Solar cell efficiency tables (version 36). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 18: 346–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grineski SE, Collins TW (2018). Geographic and social disparities in exposure to air neurotoxicants at US public schools. Environmental Research, 161: 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui N, Li J, Dong Y, Qiu Z, Jia Q, Gui W, Geert D (2017). BIM-based PV system optimization and deployment. Energy and Buildings, 150: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guittet D, Freeman JM (2018). Validation of photovoltaic modeling tool helioscope against measured data. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/72155.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MF (2018). Photon application in the design of sustainable buildings to console global energy and environment. Applied Thermal Engineering, 141: 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacira M, Simsek M, Babur Y, Demirkol S (2004). Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Renewable Energy, 29: 1265–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinesis (2018). Deakin University organisational sustainability reporting platform. Available at https://kinesis.org/case-studies/deakin-university

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HX, Gül M, Yu H, Awad H, Al-Hussein M (2016). An energy performance monitoring, analysis and modelling framework for NetZero Energy Homes (NZEHs). Energy and Buildings, 126: 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HX, Chen Y, Gül M, Yu H, Al-Hussein M (2018). Energy performance and the discrepancy of multiple NetZero Energy Homes (NZEHs) in cold regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo T (2014). Helioscope: An Integrated Photovoltaic Design Tool. Available at https://www.engineering.com/ElectronicsDesign/ ElectronicsDesignArticles/ArticleID/7045/Heli%20oscope-An-Integrated-Photovoltaic-design-Tool.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenhiser PG, Manz H, Felsmann C, Strachan PA, Frank T, Maxwell GM (2007). Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation. Solar Energy, 81: 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukac N, Seme S, Žlaus D, Štumberger G, Žalik B (2014). Buildings roofs photovoltaic potential assessment based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data. Energy, 66: 598–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Moreno F, Muñoz J, Lorenzo E (2010). Experimental model to estimate shading losses on PV arrays. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 94: 2298–2303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meteonorm (2017). Meteonorm data and program. Compared to version 7.1, version 7.2 includes updated meteorological and turbidity data and additional features. Available at http://files.pvsyst.com/help/meteo_source_meteonorm.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohajeri N, Assouline D, Guiboud B, Scartezzini, JL (2016). Does roof shape matter? Solar photovoltaic (PV) integration on building roofs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (SBE) Regional Conference. Expanding Boundaries: Systems Thinking for the Built Environment, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohajeri N, Assouline D, Guiboud B, Bill A, Gudmundsson A, Scartezzini JL (2018). A city-scale roof shape classification using machine learning for solar energy applications. Renewable Energy, 121: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberto C, Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Matsumoto Y (2016). Systematic analysis of factors affecting solar PV deployment. Journal of Energy Storage, 6: 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacca S, Sivaraman D, Keoleian GA (2007). Parameters affecting the life cycle performance of PV technologies and systems. Energy Policy, 35: 3316–3326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaschning V, Hanitsch R (1995). Shade calculations in photovoltaic systems. In: Proceedings of ISES Solar World Conference, Harare, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramabadran R, Mathur B (2009). Effect of shading on series and parallel connected solar PV modules. Modern Applied Science, 3(10): 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandia National Laboratories, (2018). Extraterrestrial radiation. Available at https://pvpmc.sandia.gov/modeling-steps/1-weather-design-inputs/irradiance-and-insolation-2/extraterrestrial-radiation. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma DK, Verma V, Singh AP (2014). Review and Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Softwares. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 4: 725–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triana MA, Lamberts R, Sassi P (2018). Should we consider climate change for Brazilian social housing? Assessment of energy efficiency adaptation measures. Energy and Buildings, 158: 1379–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy P (2000). A History of European Housing in Australia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsos T, Frantzeskaki N, Gekas V (2005). Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy, 33: 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi VV, Rahim NAA, Rahim NA, Selvaraj JA (2013). Progress in solar PV technology: Research and achievement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20: 443–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umar N, Bora B, Banerjee C, Panwar BS (2013). Comparison of different PV power simulation softwares: Case study on performance analysis of 1 MW grid-connected PV solar power plant. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 7(7): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiginton LK, Nguyen HT, Pearce JM (2010). Quantifying rooftop solar photovoltaic potential for regional renewable energy policy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34: 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woiceshyn J, Daellenbach U (2018). Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in management studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 13: 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woro AW, Ecometriks LLC (2009). System and method for identifying the solar potential of rooftops. U.S. Patent 7,500,391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski L, Lassue S, Duthoit B, Butez M (2002). Study of solar walls—Validating a simulation model. Building and Environment, 37: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, McCoy AP, Agee P, Mo Y, Reichard G, Paige F (2018). Time effects of green buildings on energy use for low-income households: A longitudinal study in the United States. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40: 559–568.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia

    Hong Xian Li, Yitao Zhang & M. Reza Hosseini

  2. School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Millennium Point, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK

    David Edwards

  3. Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    David Edwards

Authors
  1. Hong Xian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yitao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Reza Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Xian Li.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H.X., Zhang, Y., Edwards, D. et al. Improving the energy production of roof-top solar PV systems through roof design. Build. Simul. 13, 475–487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0585-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0585-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation