Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of the influence of heat emitters on the local thermal comfort in a room

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a numerical analysis of the effect of heat emitter characteristics on the local indoor thermal comfort condition in a room is presented. A dynamic model, able to evaluate the 3D distribution of the mean radiant temperature in the whole volume of a thermal zone is developed. The model allows a fast evaluation, in terms of computational time, of the view factors associated to the inner points of a room thanks to the use of the MATLAB Contour Double Integral Formula (CDIF) routine. The new tool has been used in order to obtain, by means of a series of dynamic yearly simulations, a comparison among different heat emitters (i.e. in-slab radiant floor, in-slab radiant ceiling, lightweight radiant ceiling, radiator, radiant vertical wall and all-air systems) in terms of 3D distribution of the local operative temperature in a room. The knowledge of the 3D distribution of the operative temperature enables the local analysis of the indoor thermal comfort conditions established in the room during the year. The local Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) distribution within the room is calculated for each considered configuration. The results allow to quantify how the reduction of the maximum surface temperature of the emitters, which can be experienced when the envelope thermal insulation is increased, can create more uniform indoor thermal conditions by reducing the differences existing among the heat emitters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASHRAE (2013). ASHRAE STANDARD 55. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating and Air Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2017). Handbook Fundamentals. Atlanta: American Society of Heating and Air Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awbi HB, Hatton A (1999). Natural convection from heated room surfaces. Energy and Buildings, 30: 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baehr HD, Stephan K (2006). Heat and Mass Transfer, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bojić M, Cvetković D, Miletić M, Malešević J, Boyer H (2012). Energy, cost, and CO2 emission comparison between radiant wall panel systems and radiator systems. Energy and Buildings, 54: 496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojić M, Cvetković D, Bojić L (2015). Decreasing energy use and influence to environment by radiant panel heating using different energy sources. Applied Energy, 138: 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana JP, Magni M, Dongellini M, Morini GL (2017). The benchmark of a new SIMULINK library for thermal dynamic simulation of buildings. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation Applications (BSA 2017), Bolzano, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comitato Termotecnico Italiano (2018). Test Reference Year. Available at https://try.cti2000.it. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMSOL (2017). COMSOLMultiphysics Reference Manual, version 5.3", COMSOL, Inc. Available at http://www.comsol.com. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN (2006). EN ISO 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment—Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN (2008). EN ISO 6946—Annex A.1. Building components and building elements—Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance—Calculation method. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN (2014). EN 442–. Radiators and convectors: Test methods and rating. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanger PO (1972). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judkoff R, Neymark J (1995). International Energy Agency building energy simulation test (BESTEST) and diagnostic method, No. NREL/TP-472-6231. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karmann C, Schiavon S, Bauman F (2017). Thermal comfort in buildings using radiant vs. all-air systems: A critical literature review. Building and Environment, 111: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W (1936). Das geographische System der Klimate.Handbuch der Klimatologie, vol. 1. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzier N, Rousse D (2017). MATLAB function that calculates view factors between two planar surfaces. Available at https: //it.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/5664-view-factors. Accessed 22 Sept 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Wang Z, Sun H, Zhu Y, Ouyang Q (2016). Evaluation and comparison of thermal comfort of convective and radiant heating terminals in office buildings. Building and Environment, 106: 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megri AC, Haghighat F (2007). Zonal modeling for simulating indoor environment of buildings: Review, recent developments and applications. HVAC & Research, 13: 887–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustakallio P, Kosonen R, Korinkova A (2017). Full-scale test and CFD-simulation of radiant panel integrated with exposed chilled beam in heating mode. Building Simulation, 10: 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning B, Schiavon S, Bauman FS (2017). A novel classification scheme for design and control of radiant system based on thermal response time. Energy and Buildings, 137: 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs F, Magni M, Bianchi M, Siegele D (2017). Steady state and transient simulation of a radiant heating system. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation Applications (BSA 2017), Bolzano, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsthoorn D, Haghighat F, Moreau A, Lacroix G (2017). Abilities and limitations of thermal mass activation for thermal comfort, peak shifting and shaving: A review. Building and Environment, 118: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Physibel (2010). TRISCO, version 13.0w [Software]. Maldegem, Belgium: Physibel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee KN, Kim KW (2015). A 50 year review of basic and applied research in radiant heating and cooling systems for the built environment. Building and Environment, 91: 166–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee KN, Olesen BW, Kim KW (2017). Ten questions about radiant heating and cooling systems. Building and Environment, 112: 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang F (1994). Thermische Gebäudesimulation: kritische Prüfung unterschiedlicher Modellansätze. Heidelberg: Verlag C.F. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Heiselberg PK, Chen Q, Pomianowski M (2017). Numerical analysis of diffuse ceiling ventilation and its integration with a radiant ceiling system. Building Simulation, 10: 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research has received funding in the frame of the Emilia- Romagna Regional development fund POR-FESR 2014–2020 Programme under the NANOFANCOIL project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Luca Morini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magni, M., Campana, J.P., Ochs, F. et al. Numerical investigation of the influence of heat emitters on the local thermal comfort in a room. Build. Simul. 12, 395–410 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0506-8

Keywords

Navigation