Skip to main content
Log in

The practical optimisation of complex architectural forms

  • Research Article
  • Architecture and Human Behavior
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The energy consumption of a building and its internal conditions are intimately related to its shape. There have been various attempts to use computer-based optimisation within a thermal simulation environment to produce designs with minimal energy consumption. Most of these studies have looked at optimising parameters such as U-values and glazing ratios, but a small number have looked into the form of the building, but in a way that does not naturally fit with the human-led design process. In this paper, the first practical methodology for optimising complex building facades and internal layouts is presented. The method allows for a free exploration of new, non-preconceived, design solutions in a way that complements the natural design process. The method has been tested on a design with eight facades. The rapid convergence of glazing ratios for all runs indicates their significance in the energy performance of a building. The solutions display a high degree of variability of floor shape without a compromise in performance, which indicates that human judgment can still be used as a filter even within an optimising framework. Typical solutions produced by the method show an annual total energy demand of 56 kWh/m2, 51% lower than typical for the region in which the building was sited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AIA (2011). Defining the Architect’s Basic Services. Available at http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/ek_members/documents/pdf/aiap026834.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchlaghem N (2000). Optimising the design of building envelopes for thermal performance. Automation in Construction, 10: 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas GL, Norford KL (2002). A design optimisation tool based on a genetic algorithm. Automation in Construction, 11: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouchoulas O (2003). Shape evolution: An algorithmic method for conceptual architectural design combining shape grammars and genetic algorithms. PhD Thesis, University of Bath, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronis A, Turner A, Tsigkari M (2011). Generative fluid dynamics: Integration of fast fluid dynamics and genetic algorithms for wind loading optimisation of a free form surface. In: Proceedings of 2011 Symposium on Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley DA, Winters D (1997). Genetic algorithm search efficacy in aesthetic product spaces. Complexity, 3: 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley DA (1999). An Introduction to Genetic Algorithm for Scientists and Engineers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coley DA, Schukat S (2002). Low-energy design: Combining computer-based optimisation and human judgement. Building and Environment, 37: 1241–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, Buhl WF, Huang YJ, Pedersen CO, Strand RK, Liesen RJ, Fisher DE, Witte MJ, Glazer J (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33: 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elezkurtaj T, Franck G (2001). Evolutionary Algorithms in Urban Planning. In: Proceedings of CORP 2001, Vienna, Austria, pp. 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry B, Reas C (2012). Overview: A Short Introduction to the Processing Software and Projects from the Community. Available at http://processing.org/about. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianni Botsford Architects (2005). Light House. Available at http://www.giannibotsford.com/project/light-house. Accessed 19 Apr 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading, UK: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland J (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Arbor, USA: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst JN (2003). Using whole building simulation models and optimizing procedures to optimise building envelope design with respect to energy consumption and indoor environment. In: Proceedings of 8th International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakita G (2008). Environmental optimisation methods in sustainable design process: In combination with evolution-based digital technology. Master Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen J (1999). A Brief Comparison of Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm Approaches. Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarevic B (2000). Digital morphogenesis and computational architectures. In: Proceedings of 4th SiGRaDi Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • LBNL (2010). Input Output Reference: The Encyclopedic Reference to EnergyPlus Input and Output. Enrest Orlando Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks W (1997). Multicriteria optimisation of shape of energy-saving buildings. Building and Environment, 32: 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1998). An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peippo K, Lund PD, Vartiainen E (1999). Multivariate optimisation of design trade-offs for solar low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 29: 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramallo-González, AP, Coley DA (2014). Using self-adaptive optimisation methods to perform sequential optimisation for low-energy building design. Energy and Buildings, 81: 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman MA, Gero J (1999). Evolving Designs by Generating Useful Complex Gene Structures. In: Bentley P (ed), Evolutionary Design by Computers. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel A (2012). controlP5: A GUI (Graphical User Interface) Library for Processing. Available at http://www.sojamo.de/libraries/controlP5. Accessed 16 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny G, Gips J (1972). Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In: Freiman VC (ed), Proceedings of IFIP Congress 71, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhus-Dubrow D, Krarti M (2010). Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 45: 1574–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrin M, Buelow P, Stouffs R (2011). Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modelling and genetic algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25: 656–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2012). Weather Data. Available at http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/cfm/weather_data3.cfm/region=2_asia_wmo_region_2/country=CHN/cname=China. Accessed 8 Jun 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Rivard H, Zmeureanu, R (2006). Floor shape optimisation for green building design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20: 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (2000). The IIIrd Generation of THE INDUCTION CITIES/INDUCTION DESIGN: Web Frame/Program Generated Architecture. Available at http://www.makoto-architect.com/idc2000/index2.htm. Accessed 15 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetter M, Wright J (2004). A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimisation algorithms for nonsmooth simulation-based optimisation. Building and Environment, 39: 989–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetter M (2005). BuildOpt-A new building energy simulation program that is built on smooth models. Building and Environment, 40: 1085–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Mourshed M (2009). Geometric optimisation of fenestration. In: Proceedings of 11th International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie D, Zhang G, Zhou J, Zhang Q (2007). Analysis of building energy efficiency strategies for the hot sumber and cold winter zone in China. In: Proceedings of 10th International IBPSA Conference, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Ihm P, Krarti M, Liu S, Henze GP (2003). Integration of an internal optimisation module within EnergyPlus. In: Proceedings of 8th International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso P. Ramallo-González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weng, Z., Ramallo-González, A.P. & Coley, D.A. The practical optimisation of complex architectural forms. Build. Simul. 8, 307–322 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-014-0208-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-014-0208-1

Keywords

Navigation