Abstract
We compared the effects of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/5 mg versus rosuvastatin 20 mg on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation measured by 18FDG PET/CT. Fifty patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomly assigned to the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/5 mg and rosuvastatin 20 mg groups. The primary outcome was the percent change in the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of the index vessel in the most diseased segment (MDS), as assessed by 18FDG PET/CT at baseline and at 6 months. Forty-eight patients completed follow-up PET/CT. MDS TBR was − 6.2 ± 13.9% for patients in the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin group and − 10.8 ± 17.7% for those in the rosuvastatin group (difference, 4.6 percentage points; upper limitation of one-sided confidence interval = 13.8; p = 0.60 for noninferiority). In conclusion, combination therapy with ezetimibe 10 mg and rosuvastatin 5 mg compared with rosuvastatin 20 mg did not meet the criterion for non-inferiority for primary outcome, and the present study was not conclusive on whether the former was non-inferior to the latter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 18FDG:
-
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
- ACEI:
-
Angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor
- ACS:
-
Acute coronary syndrome
- ARB:
-
Angiotensin receptor blocker
- ASCVD:
-
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- HDL:
-
High-density lipoprotein
- NSTE-ACS:
-
Non-ST segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome
- PCI:
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- LDL:
-
Low-density lipoprotein
- MDS:
-
Most diseased segment
- PET/CT:
-
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography
- STEMI:
-
ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
- SUV:
-
Standardized uptake value
- TBR:
-
Target-to-background ratio
References
Unit, E. S. (2005). Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet, 366(9493), 1267–1278.
Ference, B. A., Ginsberg, H. N., Graham, I., Ray, K. K., Packard, C. J., Bruckert, E., et al. (2017). Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. European Heart Journal, 38(32), 2459–2472.
Trialists, C. T. (2010). Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. The Lancet, 376(9753), 1670–1681.
Rodriguez, F., Maron, D. J., Knowles, J. W., Virani, S. S., Lin, S., & Heidenreich, P. A. (2017). Association between intensity of statin therapy and mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiology, 2(1), 47–54.
Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Beam, C., Birtcher, K. K., Blumenthal, R. S., et al. (2019). 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(24), 3168–3209.
Catapano, A. L., Graham, I., De Backer, G., Wiklund, O., Chapman, M. J., Drexel, H., et al. (2016). ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. European Heart Journal, 37(39), 2999–3058.
Pokharel, Y., Tang, F., Jones, P. G., Nambi, V., Bittner, V. A., Hira, R. S., et al. (2017). Adoption of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol management guideline in cardiology practices nationwide. JAMA Cardiology, 2(4), 361–369.
Rodriguez, F., Lin, S., Maron, D. J., Knowles, J. W., Virani, S. S., & Heidenreich, P. A. (2016). Use of high-intensity statins for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the Veterans Affairs Health System: practice impact of the new cholesterol guidelines. American Heart Journal, 182, 97–102.
Rosenson, R. S., Kent, S. T., Brown, T. M., Farkouh, M. E., Levitan, E. B., Yun, H., et al. (2015). Underutilization of high-intensity statin therapy after hospitalization for coronary heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(3), 270–277.
Kim, M. C., Ahn, Y., Cho, J. Y., Lee, K. H., Sim, D. S., Yoon, N. S., et al. (2019). Benefit of early statin initiation within 48 hours after admission in statin-naïve patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean circulation journal, 49(5), 419–433.
Riphagen, I. J., van der Veer, E., Muskiet, F. A., & DeJongste, M. J. (2012). Myopathy during statin therapy in the daily practice of an outpatient cardiology clinic: prevalence, predictors and relation with vitamin D. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 28(7), 1247–1252.
Bruckert, E., Hayem, G., Dejager, S., Yau, C., & Bégaud, B. (2005). Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients—the PRIMO study. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 19(6), 403–414.
Armitage, J. (2007). The safety of statins in clinical practice. The Lancet, 370(9601), 1781–1790.
Nguyen, K. A., Li, L., Lu, D., Yazdanparast, A., Wang, L., Kreutz, R. P., et al. (2018). A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of risk factors for statin-induced myopathy. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74(9), 1099–1109.
Morrone, D., Weintraub, W. S., Toth, P. P., Hanson, M. E., Lowe, R. S., Lin, J., et al. (2012). Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe plus statin and statin monotherapy and identification of factors associated with treatment response: A pooled analysis of over 21,000 subjects from 27 clinical trials. Atherosclerosis, 223(2), 251–261.
Yang, Y.-J., Lee, S.-H., Kim, B. S., Cho, Y.-K., Cho, H.-J., Im Cho, K., et al. (2017). Combination therapy of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in patients with high cardiovascular risk. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(1), 107–117.
Rudd, J. H., Myers, K. S., Bansilal, S., Machac, J., Rafique, A., Farkouh, M., et al. (2007). 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is highly reproducible: implications for atherosclerosis therapy trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 50(9), 892–896.
Tawakol, A., Fayad, Z. A., Mogg, R., Alon, A., Klimas, M. T., Dansky, H., et al. (2013). Intensification of statin therapy results in a rapid reduction in atherosclerotic inflammation: results of a multicenter fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography feasibility study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62(10), 909–917.
Libby, P. (2012). Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 32(9), 2045–2051.
Proctor, S. D., Vine, D. F., & Mamo, J. C. (2002). Arterial retention of apolipoprotein B48-and B100-containing lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Current Opinion in Lipidology, 13(5), 461–470.
Miller, Y. I., Choi, S.-H., Wiesner, P., Fang, L., Harkewicz, R., Hartvigsen, K., et al. (2011). Oxidation-specific epitopes are danger-associated molecular patterns recognized by pattern recognition receptors of innate immunity. Circulation Research, 108(2), 235–248.
Tahara, N., Kai, H., Ishibashi, M., Nakaura, H., Kaida, H., Baba, K., et al. (2006). Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation: evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 48(9), 1825–1831.
Puri, R., Nissen, S. E., Ballantyne, C. M., Barter, P. J., Chapman, M. J., Erbel, R., et al. (2013). Factors underlying regression of coronary atheroma with potent statin therapy. European Heart Journal, 34(24), 1818–1825.
Moutzouri, E., Liberopoulos, E. N., Tellis, C. C., Milionis, H. J., Tselepis, A. D., & Elisaf, M. S. (2013). Comparison of the effect of simvastatin versus simvastatin/ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin on markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis, 231(1), 8–14.
Oh, M., Kim, H., Shin, E. W., Sung, C., Kim, D.-H., Moon, D. H., et al. (2019). Effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/10 mg versus Rosuvastatin 10 mg on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 19(1), 201.
Baigent, C. (2005). Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators: Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet, 366, 1267–1278.
Trialists, C. T. (2015). Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174 000 participants in 27 randomised trials. The Lancet, 385(9976), 1397–1405.
Ference, B. A., Majeed, F., Penumetcha, R., Flack, J. M., & Brook, R. D. (2015). Effect of naturally random allocation to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the risk of coronary heart disease mediated by polymorphisms in NPC1L1, HMGCR, or both: a 2× 2 factorial Mendelian randomization study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(15), 1552–1561.
Ference, B. A., Cannon, C. P., Landmesser, U., Lüscher, T. F., Catapano, A. L., & Ray, K. K. (2017). Reduction of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and cardiovascular events with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and statins: an analysis of FOURIER, SPIRE, and the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration. European Heart Journal, 39(27), 2540–2545.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Minyoung Oh, Hyunji Kim, Eon Woo Shin, Changhwan Sung, Do-Hoon Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon, Nayoung Kim, Jae Seon Eo, Jin Won Kim, and Cheol Whan Lee declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Human Subjects/Informed Consent Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the principles of the1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Asan Medical Center and Korea University Guro Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Associate Editor Emanuele Barbato oversaw the review of this article
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, M., Kim, H., Shin, E.W. et al. Comparison of High-Dose Rosuvastatin Versus Low-Dose Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 13, 900–907 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10009-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10009-4