Skip to main content
Log in

Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over PrasugreL: a MUlticenter Randomized Open-label Trial in PatientS with ST-elevation Myocardial InFarction Referred for PrimAry PercutaneouS InTERvention (FABOLUS FASTER) Trial: Design and Rationale

The FABOLUS FASTER Trial

  • Methods Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antithrombotic therapy is a critical component of the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Rapid and profound inhibition of platelet reactivity has been shown to mitigate the ischemic risks and improve myocardial salvage. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) has been reported up to 4 or 6 h after loading dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor; therefore, multiple alternative strategies, including crushed or chewed oral tables or intravenous agents, have been investigated to provide a more rapid and sustained inhibition of platelet function and bridge the initial treatment gap. The FABOLUS FASTER is the first investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomized study to directly compare the pharmacodynamics effects of cangrelor, tirofiban, chewed or integer prasugrel. This study will add new insights in the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI and might be hypothesis-generating for future clinical trials in this field. The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02978040, and EudraCT 2017-001065-24.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAR:

Area at risk

AUC:

Area under the curve

ACS:

Acute coronary syndrome

ACT:

Activated clotting time

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

cMRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

HPRP:

High residual platelet reactivity

IPA:

Inhibition of platelet activity

LTA:

Light transmittance aggregometry

MS:

Myocardial salvage

MSI:

Myocardial salvage index

MVO:

Microvascular obstruction

PAM:

Prasugrel active metabolite

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PD:

Pharmacodynamic

PK:

Pharmacokinetic

STEMI:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

UFH:

Unfractionated heparin

References

  1. Ibanez, B., James, S., Agewall, S., Antunes, M. J., Bucciarelli-Ducci, C., Bueno, H., et al. (2018). 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal, 39(2), 119–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumann, F. J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., et al. (2019). 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Heart Journal, 40(2), 87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Valgimigli, M., Bueno, H., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J. P., Costa, F., Jeppsson, A., et al. (2018). 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal, 39(3), 213–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., Bailey, S. R., Bittl, J. A., Cercek, B., et al. (2016). 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(10), 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davi, G., & Patrono, C. (2007). Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357(24), 2482–2494. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra071014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gargiulo, G., Moschovitis, A., Windecker, S., & Valgimigli, M. (2016). Developing drugs for use before, during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 17(6), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2016.1145666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexopoulos, D., Xanthopoulou, I., Gkizas, V., Kassimis, G., Theodoropoulos, K. C., Makris, G., et al. (2012). Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions, 5(6), 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parodi, G., Valenti, R., Bellandi, B., Migliorini, A., Marcucci, R., Comito, V., et al. (2013). Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (rapid activity of platelet inhibitor drugs) primary PCI study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61(15), 1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valgimigli, M., Tebaldi, M., Campo, G., Gambetti, S., Bristot, L., Monti, M., et al. (2012). Prasugrel versus tirofiban bolus with or without short post-bolus infusion with or without concomitant prasugrel administration in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary stenting: the FABOLUS PRO (Facilitation through Aggrastat By drOpping or shortening Infusion Line in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to or on top of PRasugrel given at loading dOse) trial. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 5(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexopoulos, D., Barampoutis, N., Gkizas, V., Vogiatzi, C., Tsigkas, G., Koutsogiannis, N., et al. (2016). Crushed versus integral tablets of ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a randomized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 55(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0320-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asher, E., Frydman, S., Katz, M., Regev, E., Sabbag, A., Mazin, I., et al. (2017). Chewing versus swallowing ticagrelor to accelerate platelet inhibition in acute coronary syndrome - the CHEERS study. For the PLATIS (platelets and thrombosis in Sheba) study group. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 117(4), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-09-0728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Asher, E., Tal, S., Mazin, I., Abu-Much, A., Sabbag, A., Katz, M., et al. (2017). Effect of chewing vs swallowing ticagrelor on platelet inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiology, 2(12), 1380–1384. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3868.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Parodi, G., Xanthopoulou, I., Bellandi, B., Gkizas, V., Valenti, R., Karanikas, S., et al. (2015). Ticagrelor crushed tablets administration in STEMI patients: the MOJITO study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(5), 511–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rollini, F., Franchi, F., Hu, J., Kureti, M., Aggarwal, N., Durairaj, A., et al. (2016). Crushed prasugrel tablets in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRUSH study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(17), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Serenelli, M., Pavasini, R., Vitali, F., Tonet, E., Bilotta, F., Parodi, G., et al. (2019). Efficacy and safety of alternative oral administrations of P2Y12-receptor inhibitors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 17(6), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venetsanos, D., Sederholm Lawesson, S., Swahn, E., & Alfredsson, J. (2017). Chewed ticagrelor tablets provide faster platelet inhibition compared to integral tablets: the inhibition of platelet aggregation after administration of three different ticagrelor formulations (IPAAD-Tica) study, a randomised controlled trial. Thrombosis Research, 149, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valgimigli, M., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Tebaldi, M., van’t Hof, A. W., Campo, G., Hamm, C., et al. (2010). Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. European Heart Journal, 31(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akers, W. S., Oh, J. J., Oestreich, J. H., Ferraris, S., Wethington, M., & Steinhubl, S. R. (2010). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a bolus and infusion of cangrelor: a direct, parenteral P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 50(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009344986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angiolillo, D. J., Schneider, D. J., Bhatt, D. L., French, W. J., Price, M. J., Saucedo, J. F., et al. (2012). Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor and clopidogrel: the platelet function substudy from the cangrelor versus standard therapy to achieve optimal management of platelet inhibition (CHAMPION) trials. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 34(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-012-0737-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Storey, R. F., Wilcox, R. G., & Heptinstall, S. (2002). Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of the platelet ADP receptor antagonists clopidogrel and AR-C69931MX in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Platelets, 13(7), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953710021000024402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Storey, R. F., Oldroyd, K. G., & Wilcox, R. G. (2001). Open multicentre study of the P2T receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX assessing safety, tolerability and activity in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 85(3), 401–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenbaum, A. B., Grines, C. L., Bittl, J. A., Becker, R. C., Kereiakes, D. J., Gilchrist, I. C., et al. (2006). Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial. American Heart Journal, 151(3), 689 e681–689 e610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.11.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhatt, D. L., Lincoff, A. M., Gibson, C. M., Stone, G. W., McNulty, S., Montalescot, G., et al. (2009). Intravenous platelet blockade with cangrelor during PCI. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361(24), 2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrington, R. A., Stone, G. W., McNulty, S., White, H. D., Lincoff, A. M., Gibson, C. M., et al. (2009). Platelet inhibition with cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361(24), 2318–2329. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Angiolillo, D. J., Rollini, F., Storey, R. F., Bhatt, D. L., James, S., Schneider, D. J., et al. (2017). International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies. Circulation, 136(20), 1955–1975. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Franchi, F., Rollini, F., Rivas, A., Wali, M., Briceno, M., Agarwal, M., et al. (2019). Platelet inhibition with cangrelor and crushed ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation, 139(14), 1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vaduganathan, M., Harrington, R. A., Stone, G. W., Deliargyris, E. N., Steg, P. G., Gibson, C. M., et al. (2017). Evaluation of ischemic and bleeding risks associated with 2 parenteral antiplatelet strategies comparing cangrelor with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: an exploratory analysis from the CHAMPION trials. JAMA Cardiology, 2(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sibbing, D., Aradi, D., Alexopoulos, D., Ten Berg, J., Bhatt, D. L., Bonello, L., et al. (2019). Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 12(16), 1521–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sibbing, D., Braun, S., Morath, T., Mehilli, J., Vogt, W., Schomig, A., et al. (2009). Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment assessed with point-of-care analysis and early drug-eluting stent thrombosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(10), 849–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Farid, N. A., McIntosh, M., Garofolo, F., Wong, E., Shwajch, A., Kennedy, M., et al. (2007). Determination of the active and inactive metabolites of prasugrel in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 21(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bulluck, H., Dharmakumar, R., Arai, A. E., Berry, C., & Hausenloy, D. J. (2018). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: recent advances, controversies, and future directions. Circulation, 137(18), 1949–1964. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibanez, B., Aletras, A. H., Arai, A. E., Arheden, H., Bax, J., Berry, C., et al. (2019). Cardiac MRI endpoints in myocardial infarction experimental and clinical trials: JACC scientific expert panel. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 74(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gragnano, F., Spedicato, V., Frigoli, E., Gargiulo, G., Di Maio, D., Fimiani, F., et al. (2019). ECG analysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management: rationale and design of the electrocardiography sub-study of the MATRIX trial. Journal of Electrocardiology, 57, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.08.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is an Investigator-Initiated Trial supported by a grant to the institution (Inselspital, University of Bern) from Medicure Inc., 2-1250 Waverley Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA R3T 6C6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Valgimigli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committees (“Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern (KEK)” for Bern, Switzerland; “Comitato Etico Università Federico II” for Naples and “Comitato Etico Area Vasta Emilia Centro - AVEC” for Ferrara, Italy) and the Italian Agency of the Drug (AIFA).

Human Subjects/Informed Consent Statement

All procedures followed are in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent is obtained from all patients previous to being included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

FG reports research grant support from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC Research grant).

SW reports research and educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, CSL Behring, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Polares and Sinomed, outside the submitted work.

MV reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, Alvimedica, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb SA, Coreflow, Daiichi Sankyo, Vifor, Idorsia, Terumo, iVascular and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work.

Other authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Associate Editor Emanuele Barbato oversaw the review of this article

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gargiulo, G., Esposito, G., Cirillo, P. et al. Facilitation Through Aggrastat or Cangrelor Bolus and Infusion Over PrasugreL: a MUlticenter Randomized Open-label Trial in PatientS with ST-elevation Myocardial InFarction Referred for PrimAry PercutaneouS InTERvention (FABOLUS FASTER) Trial: Design and Rationale. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 14, 110–119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-09969-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-09969-4

Keywords

Navigation