Abstract
The benefits of total arterial (TAR) versus conventional (CR) revascularization are controversial in the higher-risk cohort of elderly patients. Taking for granted its benefit on long-term survival, we evaluated the effect of TAR on safety (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) of patients undergoing CABG. Between 2000 and 2009, 487 patients >75 years underwent isolated CABG at our institution (150 TAR and 337 CR). Patients with arterial free-grafts were excluded. After propensity matching, the outcomes of 131 TAR and 127 CR patients were compared. TAR patients had lower incidence of post-operative myocardial infarction (p = 0.025) and stroke (p = 0.005). They also experienced shorter intensive care unit (p = 0.046) and ward stay (p = 0.028), lower output of TnI (p = 0.035), and less wound complications (leg included) (p = 0.0001), while mortality was comparable (p = 0.57). In our cohort of elderly patients with multivessel disease, TAR was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and shorter hospital stay.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CABG:
-
Coronary artery bypass grafting
- CCS:
-
Canadian Coronary Score
- CR:
-
Conventional revascularization
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- IABP:
-
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- ITA:
-
Internal thoracic artery
- LM:
-
Left main
- MACCE:
-
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
- NYHA:
-
New York Heart Association
- PCI:
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- QoL:
-
Quality of life
- TAR:
-
Total arterial revascularization
References
Harskamp, R. E., Puskas, J. D., Tijssen, J. G., Walker, P. F., Liberman, H. A., Lopes, R. D., Vassiliades, T. A., Peterson, E. D., & Halkos, M. E. (2014). Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients ≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 114, 224–9.
Sabzi, F., Kazerani, H., Jalali, A., Samadi, M., & Ghasemi, F. (2013). Coronary arteries bypass grafting in elderly patients. Journal of Tehran University Heart Center, 8, 76–88.
Yusuf, S., Zucker, D., Peduzzi, P., Fisher, L. D., Takaro, T., Kennedy, J. W., Davis, K., Killip, T., Passamani, E., & Norris, R. (1994). Effect of coronary artery by-pass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery By-pass Surgery Trialist Collaboration. Lancet, 344, 563–70.
Fitzgibbon, G. M., Kafka, H. P., Leach, A. J., Keon, W. J., Hooper, G. D., & Burton, J. R. (1996). Coronary by-pass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients during 25 years. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 28, 616–26.
Loop, F. D., Lytle, B. W., Cosgrove, D. M., Stewart, R. W., Goormastic, M., Williams, G. W., Golding, L. A., Gill, C. C., Taylor, P. C., & Sheldon, W. C. (1986). Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10 year survival and other cardiac events. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1–6.
Taggart, D. P., D’Amico, R., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet, 358, 870–5.
Medalion, B., Mohr, R., Ben-Gal, Y., Nesher, N., Kramer, A., Eliyahu, S., & Pevni, D. (2015). Arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in elderly patients. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 150, 607–12.
Buxton, B. F., Raman, J. S., Ruengsakulrach, P., Gordon, I., Rosalion, A., Bellomo, R., Horrigan, M., & Hare, D. L. (2003). Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five years interim results of a randomized trial. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 125, 1363–70.
Muneretto, C., Bisleri, G., Negri, A., Manfredi, J., Carone, E., Morgan, J. A., Metra, M., & Dei Cas, L. (2004). Left internal thoracic artery radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 127, 179–84.
Myers, W. O., Berg, R., Ray, J. F., Douglas-Jones, J. W. E., Maki, H. S., Ulmer, R. H., Chaitman, B. R., & Reinhart, R. A. (2000). All artery multigraft coronary artery by-pass grafting with only internal thoracic arteries possible and safe: a randomized trial. Surgery, 128, 650–9.
Fukui, T., Tabata, M., Matsuyama, S., & Takanashi, S. (2011). Graft selection in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 59, 786–792.
Bottio, T., Tarzia, V., Rizzoli, G., & Gerosa, G. (2009). Total arterial revascularization, conventional coronary artery bypass surgery, and age cut-off for the loss of benefit from bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 35, 191.
Habib, R. H., Abou-Arraj, N. E., & Schwann, T. A. (2013). Radial artery as a second arterial graft in the elderly and both sexes. Annals of Cardiothorac Surgery, 2, 453–7.
Burfeind, W. R., Glower, D. D., Wechsler, A. S., Tuttle, R. H., Shaw, L. K., Harrell, F. E., & Rankin, J. S. (2004). Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass. 15-year follow-up of a clinical practice trial. Circulation, 110(Suppl II), 27–35.
Desai, N. D., Naylor, C. D., Kiss, A., Cohen, E. A., Feder-Elituv, R., Miwa, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Dubbin, J., Schwartz, L., & Fremes, S. E. (2007). Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency. Insight from a randomized trial. Circulation, 115, 684–691.
Paletta, C. E., Huang, D. B., Fiore, A. C., Swartz, M. T., Rilloraza, F. L., & Gardner, J. E. (2000). Major leg wound complications after saphenous vein harvest for coronary revascularization. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 70, 492–7.
Zafar, M., John, A., Khan, Z., Allen, S. M., Marchbank, A. J., Lewis, C. T., Dalrymple-Hay, M. J., Kuo, J., & Unsworth-White, J. (2005). Single-layer versus multiple-layer closure of leg wounds after long saphenous vein harvest: a prospective randomized trial. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 80, 2162–5.
Hannan, E. L., Racz, M. J., Walford, G., Jones, R. H., Ryan, T. J., Bennett, E., Culliford, A. T., Isom, O. W., Gold, J. P., & Rose, E. A. (2005). Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 2174–83.
Hannan, E. L., Wu, C., Walford, G., Culliford, A. T., Gold, J. P., Smith, C. R., Higgins, R. S., Carlson, R. E., & Jones, R. H. (2008). Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 331–41.
Serruys, P. W., Morice, M. C., Kappetein, A. P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D. R., Mack, M. J., Ståhle, E., Feldman, T. E., van den Brand, M., Bass, E. J., Van Dyck, N., Leadley, K., Dawkins, K. D., Mohr, F. W., & SYNTAX Investigators. (2009). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 961–72.
Calafiore, A. M., Di Mauro, M., Teodori, G., Di Giammarco, G., Cirmeni, S., Contini, M., Iacò, A. L., & Pano, M. (2002). Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73, 1387–93.
Kapetanakis, E. I., Stamou, S. C., Dullum, M. K., Hill, P. C., Haile, E., Boyce, S. W., Bafi, A. S., Petro, K. R., & Corso, P. J. (2004). The impact of aortic manipulation on neurological outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: a risk-adjusted study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 78, 1564–71.
Daniel, W. T., 3rd, Kilgo, P., Puskas, J. D., Thourani, V. H., Lattouf, O. M., Guyton, R. A., & Halkos, M. E. (2014). Trends in aortic clamp use during coronary artery bypass surgery: effect of aortic clamping strategies on neurologic outcomes. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147, 652–7.
Lev-Ran, O., Loberman, D., Matsa, M., Pevni, D., Nesher, N., Mohr, R., & Uretzky, G. (2004). Reduced strokes in the elderly: the benefits of untouched aorta off-pump coronary surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77, 102–7.
Bak, E., & Marcisz, C. (2014). Quality of life in elderly patients following coronary artery bypass grafting. Patient Prefer Adherence, 8, 289–99.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Giulio Rizzoli, MD, for his help with the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors received no funding for the present study and have no conflict of interest to declare.
Human Subjects/Informed Consent Statement
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Editor-in-Chief Jennifer L. Hall oversaw the review of this article
Clinical Relevance
We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of elderly patients with multivessel disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamping. After propensity matching, single-clamp, total arterial revascularization was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and shorter hospital stay with respect to the conventional technique.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bortolussi, G., Bejko, J., Gallo, M. et al. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients: Insights from a Comparative Analysis of Total Arterial and Conventional Revascularization. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 9, 223–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-016-9688-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-016-9688-y