Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients: Insights from a Comparative Analysis of Total Arterial and Conventional Revascularization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The benefits of total arterial (TAR) versus conventional (CR) revascularization are controversial in the higher-risk cohort of elderly patients. Taking for granted its benefit on long-term survival, we evaluated the effect of TAR on safety (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) of patients undergoing CABG. Between 2000 and 2009, 487 patients >75 years underwent isolated CABG at our institution (150 TAR and 337 CR). Patients with arterial free-grafts were excluded. After propensity matching, the outcomes of 131 TAR and 127 CR patients were compared. TAR patients had lower incidence of post-operative myocardial infarction (p = 0.025) and stroke (p = 0.005). They also experienced shorter intensive care unit (p = 0.046) and ward stay (p = 0.028), lower output of TnI (p = 0.035), and less wound complications (leg included) (p = 0.0001), while mortality was comparable (p = 0.57). In our cohort of elderly patients with multivessel disease, TAR was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and shorter hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CCS:

Canadian Coronary Score

CR:

Conventional revascularization

CT:

Computed tomography

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ITA:

Internal thoracic artery

LM:

Left main

MACCE:

Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

QoL:

Quality of life

TAR:

Total arterial revascularization

References

  1. Harskamp, R. E., Puskas, J. D., Tijssen, J. G., Walker, P. F., Liberman, H. A., Lopes, R. D., Vassiliades, T. A., Peterson, E. D., & Halkos, M. E. (2014). Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients ≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 114, 224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabzi, F., Kazerani, H., Jalali, A., Samadi, M., & Ghasemi, F. (2013). Coronary arteries bypass grafting in elderly patients. Journal of Tehran University Heart Center, 8, 76–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf, S., Zucker, D., Peduzzi, P., Fisher, L. D., Takaro, T., Kennedy, J. W., Davis, K., Killip, T., Passamani, E., & Norris, R. (1994). Effect of coronary artery by-pass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery By-pass Surgery Trialist Collaboration. Lancet, 344, 563–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbon, G. M., Kafka, H. P., Leach, A. J., Keon, W. J., Hooper, G. D., & Burton, J. R. (1996). Coronary by-pass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1388 patients during 25 years. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 28, 616–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Loop, F. D., Lytle, B. W., Cosgrove, D. M., Stewart, R. W., Goormastic, M., Williams, G. W., Golding, L. A., Gill, C. C., Taylor, P. C., & Sheldon, W. C. (1986). Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10 year survival and other cardiac events. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taggart, D. P., D’Amico, R., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet, 358, 870–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Medalion, B., Mohr, R., Ben-Gal, Y., Nesher, N., Kramer, A., Eliyahu, S., & Pevni, D. (2015). Arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in elderly patients. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 150, 607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buxton, B. F., Raman, J. S., Ruengsakulrach, P., Gordon, I., Rosalion, A., Bellomo, R., Horrigan, M., & Hare, D. L. (2003). Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five years interim results of a randomized trial. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 125, 1363–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muneretto, C., Bisleri, G., Negri, A., Manfredi, J., Carone, E., Morgan, J. A., Metra, M., & Dei Cas, L. (2004). Left internal thoracic artery radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 127, 179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, W. O., Berg, R., Ray, J. F., Douglas-Jones, J. W. E., Maki, H. S., Ulmer, R. H., Chaitman, B. R., & Reinhart, R. A. (2000). All artery multigraft coronary artery by-pass grafting with only internal thoracic arteries possible and safe: a randomized trial. Surgery, 128, 650–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukui, T., Tabata, M., Matsuyama, S., & Takanashi, S. (2011). Graft selection in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 59, 786–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bottio, T., Tarzia, V., Rizzoli, G., & Gerosa, G. (2009). Total arterial revascularization, conventional coronary artery bypass surgery, and age cut-off for the loss of benefit from bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 35, 191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Habib, R. H., Abou-Arraj, N. E., & Schwann, T. A. (2013). Radial artery as a second arterial graft in the elderly and both sexes. Annals of Cardiothorac Surgery, 2, 453–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burfeind, W. R., Glower, D. D., Wechsler, A. S., Tuttle, R. H., Shaw, L. K., Harrell, F. E., & Rankin, J. S. (2004). Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass. 15-year follow-up of a clinical practice trial. Circulation, 110(Suppl II), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desai, N. D., Naylor, C. D., Kiss, A., Cohen, E. A., Feder-Elituv, R., Miwa, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Dubbin, J., Schwartz, L., & Fremes, S. E. (2007). Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency. Insight from a randomized trial. Circulation, 115, 684–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paletta, C. E., Huang, D. B., Fiore, A. C., Swartz, M. T., Rilloraza, F. L., & Gardner, J. E. (2000). Major leg wound complications after saphenous vein harvest for coronary revascularization. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 70, 492–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zafar, M., John, A., Khan, Z., Allen, S. M., Marchbank, A. J., Lewis, C. T., Dalrymple-Hay, M. J., Kuo, J., & Unsworth-White, J. (2005). Single-layer versus multiple-layer closure of leg wounds after long saphenous vein harvest: a prospective randomized trial. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 80, 2162–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hannan, E. L., Racz, M. J., Walford, G., Jones, R. H., Ryan, T. J., Bennett, E., Culliford, A. T., Isom, O. W., Gold, J. P., & Rose, E. A. (2005). Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 2174–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hannan, E. L., Wu, C., Walford, G., Culliford, A. T., Gold, J. P., Smith, C. R., Higgins, R. S., Carlson, R. E., & Jones, R. H. (2008). Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Serruys, P. W., Morice, M. C., Kappetein, A. P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D. R., Mack, M. J., Ståhle, E., Feldman, T. E., van den Brand, M., Bass, E. J., Van Dyck, N., Leadley, K., Dawkins, K. D., Mohr, F. W., & SYNTAX Investigators. (2009). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 961–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Calafiore, A. M., Di Mauro, M., Teodori, G., Di Giammarco, G., Cirmeni, S., Contini, M., Iacò, A. L., & Pano, M. (2002). Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after surgical myocardial revascularization. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73, 1387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapetanakis, E. I., Stamou, S. C., Dullum, M. K., Hill, P. C., Haile, E., Boyce, S. W., Bafi, A. S., Petro, K. R., & Corso, P. J. (2004). The impact of aortic manipulation on neurological outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery: a risk-adjusted study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 78, 1564–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Daniel, W. T., 3rd, Kilgo, P., Puskas, J. D., Thourani, V. H., Lattouf, O. M., Guyton, R. A., & Halkos, M. E. (2014). Trends in aortic clamp use during coronary artery bypass surgery: effect of aortic clamping strategies on neurologic outcomes. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147, 652–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lev-Ran, O., Loberman, D., Matsa, M., Pevni, D., Nesher, N., Mohr, R., & Uretzky, G. (2004). Reduced strokes in the elderly: the benefits of untouched aorta off-pump coronary surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77, 102–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bak, E., & Marcisz, C. (2014). Quality of life in elderly patients following coronary artery bypass grafting. Patient Prefer Adherence, 8, 289–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Giulio Rizzoli, MD, for his help with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomaso Bottio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors received no funding for the present study and have no conflict of interest to declare.

Human Subjects/Informed Consent Statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Editor-in-Chief Jennifer L. Hall oversaw the review of this article

Clinical Relevance

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of elderly patients with multivessel disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamping. After propensity matching, single-clamp, total arterial revascularization was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and shorter hospital stay with respect to the conventional technique.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table 3

(DOC 81.5 kb)

Table 4

(DOC 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bortolussi, G., Bejko, J., Gallo, M. et al. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients: Insights from a Comparative Analysis of Total Arterial and Conventional Revascularization. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 9, 223–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-016-9688-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-016-9688-y

Keywords

Navigation