Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Compatibility of Preoperative MRCP and Intraoperative Cholangiography in Imaging of the Bile Ducts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the compatibility of preoperative 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (3D MRCP) and intraoperative cholangiographies (IOC) of donors using Huang classification in living donor liver transplantation. Thirty-six consecutive right donor hepatectomy cases were retrospectively analyzed with preoperative MRCP and intraoperative cholangiography. Biliary variants were determined according to the Huang classification. Compatibility in MRCP and IOC was evaluated. 3D MRCP accurately determined the biliary anatomy in 32 of 36 cases (88.88%). The IOC of the 36 donors showed 25 normal bifurcations and 11 biliary variants. For detecting normal and variant anatomy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 96.0%, 72.7%, 88.9%, and 88.9.0%, respectively. There was a substantial inter-rater agreement between IOC and MRCP in determining normal and variant anatomy (κ = 0.724, p < 0.001). 3D MRCP is a non-invasive useful method to evaluate non-dilated bile ducts preoperatively in living donor liver transplantation. The eligibility criteria determined according to preoperative MRCP images should also be confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gamal GH (2017) Minimizing the postoperative biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation, by utility of preoperative non-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Radtke A, Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos G, Molmenti E, Nadalin S, Schroeder T et al (2009) Vascular and biliary anatomy of the right hilar window: its impact on recipient morbidity and mortality for right graft live donor liver transplantation. World J Surg 33:1941–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawarada Y, Das BC, Taoka H (2000) Anatomy of the hepatic hilar area: the plate system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:580–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kashyap R, Bozorgzadeh A, Abt P, Tsoulfas G, Maloo M, Sharma R et al (2008) Stratifying risk of biliary complications in adult living donor liver transplantation by magnetic resonance cholangiography. Transplantation 85:1569–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B, Qayyum A, Roberts JP, Coakley FV (2004) Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography—initial experience. Radiology 230:645–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ragab A, Lopez-Soler RI, Oto A, Testa G (2013) Correlation between 3D-MRCP and intra-operative findings in right liver donors. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2:7–13

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman J, Florman S, Varotti G, Gondolesi GE, Gerning A, Fishbein T et al (2003) Noninvasive preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in right-lobe living donors with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography. Transplant Proc 35:1421–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. El Hariri M, Riad MM (2019) Intrahepatic bile duct variation: MR cholangiography and implication in hepatobiliary surgery. Egypt j radiol nucl med 50:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Catalano OA, Singh AH, Uppot RN, Hahn PF, Ferrone CR, Sahani DV (2008) Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: implications for liver surgery. Radiographics 28:359–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu X, Wei X, Ling Q, Wang K, Bao H, Xie H et al (2012) Inaccurate preoperative imaging assessment on biliary anatomy not increases biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation. Eur J Radiol 81:457–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yam BL, Siegelman ES (2014) MR imaging of the biliary system. Radiol Clin North Am 52:725–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohgi K, Furukawa T, Akiyama H, Kimura S, Uehara K, Murata K (1998) Basic principles and historical consideration of MR cholangiopancreatography (in Japanese with English abstract). Nihon Rinsho 56:2755–2759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Badger WR, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN (2017) Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: an institutional analysis and literature review. Am J Surg 214:251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hjartarson JH, Hannesson P, Sverrisson I, Blöndal S, Ívarsson B, Björnsson ES (2016) The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis. Scand J Gastroenterol 51:1249–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW, Lu DS (2004) The utility of MRCP in preoperative mapping of biliary anatomy in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim RD, Sakamoto S, Haider MA, Molinari M, Gallinger S, McGilvray ID et al (2005) Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in assessing biliary anatomy in right lobe living donors. Transplantation 79:1417–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ringe KI, Hartung D, von Falck C, Wacker F, Raatschen HJ (2014) 3D-MRCP for evaluation of intra-and extrahepatic bile ducts: comparison of different acquisition and reconstruction planes. BMC Med Imag 14:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffin N, Charles-Edwards G, Grant LA (2012) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights Imag 3:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Basaran C, Agildere AM, Donmez FY, Sevmis S, Budakoglu I, Karakayali H et al (2008) MR cholangiopancreatography with T2-weighted prospective acquisition correction turbo spin-echo sequence of the biliary anatomy of potential living liver transplant donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1527–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kinner S, Steinweg V, Maderwald S, Radtke A, Sotiropoulos G, Forsting M et al (2014) Comparison of different magnetic resonance cholangiography techniques in living liver donors ıncluding Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted sequences. PloS One. 9:e113882

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysegul Gormez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donmez, R., Gormez, A. Evaluation of the Compatibility of Preoperative MRCP and Intraoperative Cholangiography in Imaging of the Bile Ducts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Indian J Surg 84 (Suppl 2), 418–423 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03342-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03342-2

Keywords

Navigation