Skip to main content
Log in

Bile Duct Duplication, Choledocholithiasis, and Pancreaticobiliary maljunction

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Duplication of the common bile duct (DCBD) is a rare congenital anomaly, with no more than 100 published cases in the literature. The malignant rate of this condition may reach 25%. Besides, complicated morbidities could co-exist, which might put surgeons in a difficult situation. We report the case of a 36-year-old Vietnamese man, admitted due to epigastric pain and jaundice. The patient was then diagnosed with type II DCBD with comorbidities (choledocholithiasis, pancreaticobiliary maljunction). Cholecystectomy, lithotripsy, and accessory bile duct removal were performed. The patient was discharged uneventfully 1 week later. To conclude, we would like to emphasize the importance of basic knowledge in complicated hepatobiliary cases, for example, DBCD, to provide the optimal approach for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benson EA, Page RE (1976) A practical reappraisal of the anatomy of the extrahepatic bile ducts and arteries. Br J Surg 63(11):853–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knisely AS (2003) Biliary tract malformations. Am J Med Genet A 122A(4):343–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura K, Mitsubuchi H, Miyayama H, Yatsunami K, Ishimatsu J, Yamamoto T et al (2003) Complete absence of bile and pancreatic ducts in a newborn: a new entity of congenital anomaly in hepato-pancreatic development. J Hum Genet 48(7):380–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta V, Chandra A (2012) Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct. Congenit Anom 52(3):176–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan X, He L, Khadaroo PA, Zhou D, Lin H (2018) Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct: a case report and review of the literatures. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(8):e9953–e10053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goor DA, Ebert PA (1972) Anomalies of the biliary tree. Report of a repair of an accessory bile duct and review of the literature. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 104(3):302–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saito N, Nakano A, Arase M, Hiraoka T (1988) A case of duplication of the common bile duct with anomaly of the intrahepatic bile duct. Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi 89(8):1296–1301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi E, Byun JH, Park BJ, Lee MG (2007) Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct with anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system revealed by MR cholangiopancreatography. Br J Radiol 80(955):e150–e154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen G, Wang H, Zhang L, Li Z, Bie P (2014) Double common bile duct with choledochal cyst and cholelithiasis: report of a case. Surg Today 44(4):778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SW, Park DH, Shin HC, Kim IY, Park SH, Jung EJ et al (2008) Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct in association with choledocholithiasis as depicted by MDCT. Korean J Radiol 9(6):550–554

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyden EA (1932) The problem of the double ductus choledochus (an interpretation of an accessory bile duct found attached to the pars superior of the duodenum). Anat Rec 55(1):71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita K, Oka Y, Urakami A, Iwamoto S, Tsunoda T, Eto T (2002) Double common bile duct: a case report and a review of the Japanese literature. Surgery 131(6):676–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamisawa T, Honda G (2019) Pancreaticobiliary maljunction: markedly high risk for biliary cancer. Digestion 99(2):123–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamisawa T, Ando H, Suyama M, Shimada M, Morine Y, Shimada H (2012) Japanese clinical practice guidelines for pancreaticobiliary maljunction. J Gastroenterol 47(7):731–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohuchida J, Chijiiwa K, Hiyoshi M, Kobayashi K, Konomi H, Tanaka M (2006) Long-term results of treatment for pancreaticobiliary maljunction without bile duct dilatation. Arch Surg 141(11):1066–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang J, Jang JY, Kang MJ, Jung W, Shin YC, Kim SW (2016) Clinicopathologic differences in patients with gallbladder cancer according to the presence of anomalous biliopancreatic junction. World J Surg 40(5):1211–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ha STM, Ngan VK (2019) Double common bile duct: report of a case. Vietnam J Radiol. 34(05):81–84

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arora A, Sureka B, Kasana V, Patidar Y, Bansal K (2015) Common bile duct duplication: the more the murkier. Saudi J Gastroenterol 21(1):51–54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Hepatobiliary surgery, VietDuc University hospital, Hanoi for their great support.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Thi Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. The study was approved by our research committee, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, L.T., Do, D.H., Thai, A.D. et al. Bile Duct Duplication, Choledocholithiasis, and Pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Indian J Surg 85, 158–161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03340-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03340-4

Keywords

Navigation