Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the Effects of Different Intraabdominal Pressures on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has deleterious effects on intracranial pressure. In this study, we intended to investigate the effects of intraabdominal pressure values on intracranial pressure (ICP) measured by ultrasound-assisted optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement in patients who underwent major surgery. Observational study. All patients’ age, gender, weight, types of surgeries, comorbidities, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, operation time, and amount of fluid administered during the operation were all recorded. Intraabdominal pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter measurements were measured. The patients were separated into 3 groups: group I, intraabdominal pressure 0–11 mmHg; group II, intraabdominal pressure 12–19 mmHg; and group III, intraabdominal pressure 20 mmHg and above. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay and prognosis were all recorded. Intraabdominal pressure, left optic nerve sheath diameter, right optic nerve sheath diameter, and heart rate (HR) measurements were meaningfully higher in group II and group III compared to group I (p < 0.001 for each), and group III was significantly higher compared to group I (p < 0.001). In patients with high intraabdominal pressure, optic nerve sheath diameter follow-up with ultrasonography gains great importance. We recommend that attention should be paid to this situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J et al (2013) Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intens Care Med 39:1190–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Laet IE, Malbrain MLNG, De Waele JJ (2020) A clinician’s guide to management of intraabdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill patients. Crit Care 24:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vidal MG, Weisser JR, Gonzalez F, Toro MA, Loudet C, Balasini C, Canales H et al (2008) Incidence and clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 36:1823–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dip F, Nguyen D, Rosales A, Sasson M, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2016) Impact of controlled intraabdominal pressure on the optic nerve sheath diameter during laparasopic procedures. Surg Endosc 30:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Haim M, Mandeli J, Friedman RL, Rosenthal RJ (2000) Mechanisms of systemic hypertension during acute elevation of intraabdominal pressure. J Surg Res 91:101–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vegar-Brozovic V, Brezak J, Brozovic I (2008) Intra-abdominal hypertension: pulmonary and cerebral complications. Transpl Proc 40:1190–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenthal RJ, Friedman RL, Kahn AM, Martz J, Thiagarajah S, Cohen D, Shi Q et al (1998) Reasons for intracranial hypertension and hemodynamic instability during acute elevations of intraabdominal pressure: observations in a large animal model. J Gastrointest Surg 2:415–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moretti R, Pizzi B, Cassini F, Vivaldi N (2009) Reliability of optic nerve ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 11:406–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim EJ, Kool BN, Choi SH, Park K, Kim MS (2018) Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter for predicting elevated intracranial pressure during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosin D, Brasesco O, Varela J, Saber AA, You S, Rosenthal RJ, Cohn SM (2002) Low-pressure laparoscopy may ameliorate intracranial hypertension and renal hypoperfusion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 12:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dip F, Nguyen D, Rosales A, Sasson M, Lo Menzo E, Stomstein S, Rosenthal R (2016) Impact of controlled intraabdominal pressure on the optic nerve sheath diameter during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 30:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugrue M, Buist MD, Hourihan F, Deane S, Bauman A, Hillman K (1995) Prospective study of intra-abdominal hypertension and renal function after laparotomy. BJS 82(2):235–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dushyant I, Scott D’A, Anders A (2014) Intra-abdominal hypertension in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Resusc 16:214–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biancofiore G, Bindi ML, Romanelli AM, Boldrini A, Consani G, Bisa M, Filipponi F et al (2003) Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in liver transplant recipients: a prospective study. Intens Care Med 29:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vatankhah S, Sheikhi RA, Heidari M, Moradimajd P (2018) The relationship between fluid resuscitation and intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 8:149–153

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. He L, Yi C, Hou Z, Hak DJ (2019) Intraabdominal hypertension/abdominal compartment syndrome after pelvic fractures: How they occur and what can be done? Injury 50:919–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bloomfield GL, Blocher CR, Fakhry IF, Sugerman HJ (1997) Elevated intraabdominal pressure increases plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels. J Trauma 42:997–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal R, Friedman R, Phillips E (1998) Intraabdominal pressure, intracranial pressure and hemodynamics: a central nervous system regulated response. Pathophysiol pneumoperitoneum 10:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hargreaves DM (1990) Hypercapnia and raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Anesthesia 45:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mokri B (2001) The Monro-Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology 56:1746–1748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL (2011) Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 15:506–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, Vigue’ B, Duranteau J (2008) Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intensive Care Med 34:2062–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ballantyne SA, O’Neill G, Hamilton R, Hollman AS (2002) Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in normal adults. Eur J Ultrasound 15:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Malbrain MLNG, De Waele JJ, De Keulenaer BL (2015) What every ICU clinician needs to know about the cardiovascular effects caused by abdominal hypertension. Anaesthesiol Intens Care 47:388–399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Turan Inal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inal, M., Memis, D., Demir, E. et al. Investigation of the Effects of Different Intraabdominal Pressures on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery. Indian J Surg 84, 1051–1061 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03212-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03212-3

Keywords

Navigation