Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Pre-pectoral vs. Sub-pectoral—An Outcome Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the most common reconstructive procedure after mastectomy. In the last years pre-pectoral IBR gained popularity over the sub-pectoral technique but long-term outcomes are still unavailable. The aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of different approaches to IBR (direct-to-implant (DTI) and expander-to-implant (ETI), pre-pectoral and sub-pectoral techniques). A retrospective review of all patients undergoing immediate IBR from April 2011 to April 2019 under the care of a single plastic surgeon was performed. A total of 106 patients (138 breasts) underwent mastectomy and IBR. Although no significant statistical differences were identified, the incidence of skin necrosis was lower in ETI reconstructions. Pre-pectoral reconstructions had a shorter length of hospital stay. ETI sub-pectoral IBR confirms to be the safest option albeit requiring two surgical procedures. DTI pre-pectoral IBR seems to be related with a higher rate of implant loss if a complication happens. Conversely, in DTI sub-pectoral IBR complications can be more often managed conservatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vidya R, Berna G, Sbitany H et al (2019) Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a joint consensus guide from UK, European and USA breast and plastic reconstructive surgeons. Ecancermedicalscience. 13:927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vidya R, Iqbal FM, Becker H, Zhadan O (2019) Rippling associated with pre-pectoral implant based breast reconstruction: a new grading system. World J Plast Surg. 8(3):311–315

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber WP, Haug M, Kurzeder C, Bjelic-Radisic V, Koller R, Reitsamer R, Fitzal F, Biazus J, Brenelli F, Urban C, Paulinelli RR, Blohmer JU, Heil J, Hoffmann J, Matrai Z, Catanuto G, Galimberti V, Gentilini O, Barry M, Hadar T, Allweis TM, Olsha O, Cardoso MJ, Gouveia PF, Rubio IT, de Boniface J, Svensjö T, Bucher S, Dubsky P, Farhadi J, Fehr MK, Fulco I, Ganz-Blättler U, Günthert A, Harder Y, Hauser N, Kappos EA, Knauer M, Landin J, Mechera R, Meani F, Montagna G, Ritter M, Saccilotto R, Schwab FD, Steffens D, Tausch C, Zeindler J, Soysal SD, Lohsiriwat V, Kovacs T, Tansley A, Wyld L, Romics L, el-Tamer M, Pusic AL, Sacchini V, Gnant M (2018) Oncoplastic breast consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 172(3):523–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 96(5):1119–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sbitany H (2019) Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: a less invasive option. Gland Surg. 8(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovacs T, Charalampoulis P, Hout B et al (2017) Results from the BRIOS randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 18:e190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A, Macarios D, Parekh M, Wang F, Griffin L, Sigalove S (2018) Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: a literature review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 117(6):1119–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB et al (2017) Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(2):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasa DR, Garvey PB, Qi J, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Pusic AL, Kronowitz SJ, Wilkins EG, Butler CE, Clemens MW (2017) Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective, multicentre study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140:869–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pre-pectoral versus sub-pectoral implant placement in immediate breast reconstruction. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03959709. Accessed Feb 2021

  11. Harvey KL, Mills N, White P, on behalf of the Pre-BRA feasibility study steering group et al (2020) The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral breast reconstruction evaluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. BMJ Open 10:e033641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, Skillman J, Barnes NLP, Mylvaganam S, Teasdale E, Jain A, Gardiner MD, Blazeby JM, Holcombe C, Achuthan R, Adwan I, Aggarwal S, Ahmed M, Akelund M, Akolekar D, al-Jibury O, Amanita M, Appleton D, Archampong D, Asgiersson K, Athwal R, Augusti A, Ayaani S, Bains S, Baker B, Baker E, Baldota S, Banerjee D, Barker S, Barr L, Barry P, Basu N, Bathla S, Bishop N, Boland G, Branford OA, Bright-Thomas R, Brindle R, Brock L, Brown V, Bux F, Byrne G, Cain H, Caldon L, Callaghan M, Carbone A, Carpenter R, Cawthorn S, Chagla L, Challoner T, Chalmers C, Chalmers R, Chambers S, Chana M, Chand N, Chandran V, Chandrashekar M, Charfare H, Chatterjee J, Chatterjee S, Chattopadhyay R, Chaudry A, Chin K, Chong K, Chouhan A, Choy C, Christopoulos P, Clarke D, Clarke S, Clayton E, Clifford R, Cocker D, Collin T, Collis N, Conroy F, Constantinou C, Conway A, Cook J, Coombs N, Cox K, Critchley A, Dakka M, Dani M, Daoud R, Darragh L, Darvesh S, Dash I, Datta S, Davies E, Dawson S, de Sousa E, Debnath D, Deol H, Devalia H, di Micco R, Dicks JR, Dickson J, Dobner N, Dobson G, Dunne N, Egbeare D, el Sharief D, Elfadl D, Eltigani E, Enver D, Erel E, Evans A, Exarchos G, Fage E, Fatayer H, Fenn C, Ferguson D, Foulkes R, Franks J, Fung V, Galea M, Gandamihardja T, Gandhi A, Garnsey C, Gateley C, Gattuso J, Gawne S, Geerthan N, Ghattura A, Giaramadze A, Gill J, Godden AR, Goh S, Govindarajulu S, Goyal S, Graja T, Granger S, Green M, Grover K, Gui G, Gurung R, Gutteridge E, Hakim A, Halka A, Hamilton-Burke W, Hamo I, Harding-Mackean C, Hargreaves A, Harries S, Harris K, Harris P, Harrison S, Harvey J, Hashem M, Hassan U, Henderson J, Henton J, Hignett S, Hodgkins K, Horgan K, Horn S, Hu J, Hussain A, Iddon J, Iqbal A, Irri R, Irvine T, Irwin G, Iskender A, Ismail A, Ives C, James K, James R, Jiwa N, Jobson M, Joglekar S, Johnson L, Johnson R, Johnson R, Jones L, Ju Hwang M, Kalles V, Kanesalingam K, Karat I, Kaushik M, Kennedy K, Khalifa E, Khan H, Khanbhai M, Khawaja S, Khout H, Kiernan T, Kim B, Kirkpatrick K, Kiruparan P, Kirwan C, Kishore M, Kneeshaw P, Knight A, Kohlhardt S, Krupa J, Krupa K, Kuruvilla R, Laban C, Lai LM, Laidlaw I, Lambert K, Langlands F, Lansdown M, Laurence N, Laws S, Ledwidge S, Lefemine V, Lennon H, Linforth R, Little K, Luangsomboon A, Lund J, Maalo J, MacLennan L, Macmillan RD, MacNeil F, Mahapatra TK, Mallidis E, Mallon P, Manoloudakis N, Maraqa L, Marla S, Masood S, Massey J, Masudi T, Matey P, Mazari F, McCulley S, McEvoy K, Mcintosh J, McIntosh S, McKenzie S, McManus P, McNicholas J, Michalakis I, Mills N, Mitchell G, Monib S, Mullan M, Murphy C, Murphy G, Murphy J, Murthy B, Musa S, Nagra G, Nangalia R, Narayanan S, Nasr R, Navin C, Newton R, Nicholson S, Nuru N, O'Connell R, O'Donoghue J, Ogedegbe A, Olayinka OS, Olsen S, Osborn G, Osborne C, Osman H, Otieno C, Pakzad F, Park A, Parker S, Partlett P, Parvaiz A, Parvanta L, Patel G, Peel A, Peiris L, Pennick M, Peppe A, Perry D, Pilgrim S, Piper J, Poonawalla S, Popa E, Pope V, Pugh P, Rainsbury D, Ramsey K, Rasheed T, Rathinaezhil R, Rattay T, Ravichandran D, Reed M, Refsum S, Remoundos D, Rigby K, Robertson S, Robinson A, Robinson J, Roche N, Roy PJ, Runkel M, Rusby J, Saha S, Saidan Z, Salab M, Saleh M, Salem F, Sami A, Samlalsingh S, Sarfraz N, Shah R, Shaheed S, Sharaiha Y, Shetty G, Shotton R, Sircar T, Skene E, Sloan S, Smith B, Smith J, Soldanova L, Soliman F, Soumian S, Stevens J, Steventon C, Stewart-Parker E, Stringfellow T, Sutaria R, Sutton R, Sweetland H, Swiech B, Tadiparthi S, Tafazal H, Taheri N, Tait C, Tan M, Tang S, Tansley A, Tate S, Tayeh S, Taylor A, Taylor J, Thawdar P, Thomas C, Thomas S, Thomson S, Thorne A, Tillett R, Tolkien Z, Tomlins A, Topps A, Tsang F, Turner EJ, Turton P, Udayasankar S, Ugolini F, Vaughan Williams E, Vidya R, Vijaynagar B, Vinayagam R, Volleamere A, Voynov V, Waheed S, Walker T, Walsh U, Warner R, Waters R, Wilkins A, Williams K, Wilson G, Wiltsher M, Wooler B, Wright C, Wright M, Wyld L, Youssef M, Zabkiewicz C, Zammit C, Zeidan B, Zheng D (2019) Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 20(2):254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garreffa E, Agrawal A (2019) Cost-effectiveness of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a pilot comparative analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 72(10):1700–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Garreffa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval was not necessary for this retrospective study according to Italian law and ethical guidelines.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained by all individual patients included in the study. An additional consent was obtained by the individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garreffa, E., Brucchi, M., Sozio, A. et al. Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Pre-pectoral vs. Sub-pectoral—An Outcome Analysis. Indian J Surg 83 (Suppl 2), 491–497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02810-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02810-5

Keywords

Navigation