Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Extractum Cepae, Heparin Sodium, and Allantoin in Experimental Peritoneal Adhesion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of extractum cepae (EC), heparin sodium (HS), and allantoin (AA) on postoperative peritoneal adhesion (PPA) prevention. Forty-eight rats were allocated into six groups (n = 8). PPA was performed by Harris method. In group 1, no additional procedure was done. Abdominal cavity was washed with normal saline in group 2, EC in group 3, HS in group 4, AA in group 5, and EC-HS-AA mixture (EHA-m) in group 6. On the 21st postoperative day, PPA was scored with Nair adhesion score and examined for fibrosis histopathologically and hydroxy-proline levels (OHP) biochemically. Macroscopically, PPA was decreased in groups 2, 4, and 6 compared to groups 1, 3, and 5 (p < 0.05) and decreased in group 2 compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Histopathologically, fibrosis was decreased in groups 2, 4, and 6 compared to other groups and decreased in group 2 compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Tissue OHP level was decreased in groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 compared to groups 1 and 6 (p < 0.05). Tissue OHP level was decreased in group 6 compared to group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant. PPA formation decreases with normal saline, HS and EHA-m, whereas increases with EC and AA both macroscopically and microscopically. Although HS and EHA-m seem to have adhesion prevention effect, washing the intestines with saline seems to be more effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ (2009) Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005080

  2. Chen MJ, Chen TY, Cheng YM, Hsu YC (2012) The effect of postoperative hyperbaric oxygen treatment on intra-abdominal adhesions in rats. Int J Mol Sci 13:12224–12231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CN, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, Tapprich C, Krämer B, Wallwiener C, Hierlemann H, Zehbe R, Planck H, Kirkpatrick CJ (2012) Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1256–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broek RPG, Kok-Krant N, Bakkum EA, Bleichrodt RP, Goor H (2013) Different surgical techniques to reduce post-operative adhesion formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 19:12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duron JJ, Silva NJ, Montcel ST, Berger A, Muscari F, Hennet H et al (2006) Adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction: incidence and risk factors of recurrence after surgical treatment. Ann Surg 244:750–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dogramaci Y, Kalacı A, Atik E, Esen E, Altuğ ME, Onel E et al (2010) Effects of a single application of extractum cepae on the peritendinous adhesion. Ann Plast Surg 64:338–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arikan S, Adas G, Barut G, Toklu AS, Kocakusak A, Uzun H, Kemik O, Daduk Y, Aydin S, Purisa S (2005) An evaluation of low molecular weight heparin and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions and wound healing. Am J Surg 189:155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Araujo LU, Grabe-Guimaraes A, Mosqueira VCF, Carneiro CM, Silva-Barcellos NM (2010) Profile of wound healing process induced by allantoin. Acta Cir Bras 25:460–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris ES, Morgan RF, Rodeheaver GT (1995) Analysis of the kinetics of peritoneal adhesion formation in the rat and evaluation of potential antiadhesive agents. Surgery 117:663–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomson M, Alnaqeeb MA, Bordia T, Al-Hassan JM, Afzal M, Ali M (1998) Effects of aqueous extract of onion on the liver and lung of rats. J Ethnopharmacol 61:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nair SK, Bhat IK, Aurora AR (1974) Role of proteolytic enzymes in the prevention of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. Arch Surg 108:849–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aysan E, Bektas H, Ersoz F, Sari S, Huq G (2010) Effects of contractubex on the prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion. J Surg Res 164:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Wilson A, Hennessy MM, Athanasiou A, Beal EW, Argyrou C, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM (2017) Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in prevention and management. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1713–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allegre L, Teuff I, Leprince S, Warembourg S, Taillades H, Garric X et al (2018) A new bioabsorbable polymer film to prevent peritoneal adhesions validated in a post-surgical animal model. PLoS One 13:e0202285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Almamar A, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA (2018) The systemic effect and the absorption rate of aerosolized intra-peritoneal heparin with or without hyaluronic acid in the prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. Surg Endosc 33:2517–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6540-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Panahi F, Sadraie SH, Khoshmohabat H, Shahram E, Kaka G, Hosseinalipour M (2012) Macroscopic and pathological assessment of methylene blue and normal saline on postoperative adhesion formation in a rat cecum model. Int J Surg 10:537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang CL, Jayne DG, Seow-Choen F, Ng YY, Eu KW, Mustapha N (2006) A randomized controlled trial of 0.5% ferric hyaluronate gel (Intergel) in the prevention of adhesions following abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 243:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavallari N, Polistena A, Cavallaro A (2000) Inability of University of Wisconsin solution to reduce postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rats. Eur J Surg 166:650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsa H, Saravani H, Sameei-Rad F, Nasiri M, Farahaninik Z, Rahmani A (2017) Comparing lavage of the peritoneal cavity with lidocaine, bupivacaine and normal saline to reduce the formation of abdominal adhesion bands in rats. Malays J Med Sci 24:26–32

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Makarchian HR, Kasraianfard A, Ghaderzadeh P, Javadi SMR, Ghorbanpoor M (2017) The effectiveness of heparin, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and silver nanoparticles on prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation in rats. Acta Cir Bras 32:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was accepted as the master thesis of Ismail Ozmen, M.D. (Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Medicine, and Department of Pediatric Surgery). The thesis advisors are Boybeyi-Turer O and Gunal YD.

This study was presented as an oral presentation in the 33rd Congress of National Pediatric Surgery Association, Antalya, Turkey, 2015.

Funding

This study was supported by Kırıkkale University Scientific Research Council (2014/81) for only purchasing laboratory animal and other materials stated in the methods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed to the study as follows: (i) conception and design: I Ozmen and O Boybeyi-Turer; (ii) materials and experiments: I Ozmen and Y Dere Gunal; (iii) analysis and interpretation: P Atasoy, U Kısa, and S Yörübulut; (iv) writer and supervision: O Boybeyi-Turer; and (v) critical review: Y Dere Gunal and O Boybeyi-Turer.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozlem Boybeyi-Turer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All experiments were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted (Kirikkale Local Ethical Committee, Date and Number of Permission: 30/01/2014–14/02-22).

Conflict of Interest

The authors, Ozmen I, Dere Gunal Y, Atasoy P, Kisa U, Yorubulut S, Aslan MK, and Boybeyi-Turer, declare that they have no any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozmen, I., Gunal, Y.D., Atasoy, P. et al. The Effect of Extractum Cepae, Heparin Sodium, and Allantoin in Experimental Peritoneal Adhesion. Indian J Surg 82, 892–898 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02176-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02176-0

Keywords

Navigation