Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay in Pulmonary Resection Patients With and Without Autologous Fibrin Sealant: a Retrospective Descriptive Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prolonged air leak and excessive pleural fluid drainage are important factors affecting morbidity and mortality following pulmonary resection. This study investigated the effects of autologous fibrin sealant on length of hospital stay in patients who underwent pulmonary resection. A total of 90 patients who underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy in our center were included in the study. Thirty-seven of the patients were treated with autologous fibrin sealant after resection, while the other 53 patients were not (control group). The patients’ records were retrospectively examined to compare demographic, surgical, and postoperative data between the groups. There were no significant differences between the autologous fibrin sealant group and the control group in terms of age, sex, type of operation, indications for surgery, or preexisting comorbidities (p > 0.05). Mean time to drain removal and mean postoperative time to hospital discharge were significantly shorter in the autologous fibrin sealant group (p = 0.0001). Our results indicate that using autologous fibrin sealant decreases the time to drain removal as well as length of postoperative hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Waele M, Agzarian J, Hanna WC, Schieman C, Finley CJ, Macri J et al (2017) Does the usage of digital chest drainage systems reduce pleural inflammation and volume of pleural effusion following oncologic pulmonary resection?-a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Dis. 9:1598–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbert S, McGuire AL, Maghera S, Sundaresan SR, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Villeneuve PJ (2015) Randomized trial of digital versus analog pleural drainage in patients with or without a pulmonary air leak after lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:1243–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Korasidis S, Andreetti C, D'Andrilli A, Ibrahim M, Ciccone A, Poggi C et al (2010) Management of residual pleural space and air leaks after major pulmonary resection. Interact Cardio Vasc Thorac Surg 10:923–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burt BM, Shrager JB (2015) The prevention and management of air leaks following pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin 25:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kılıç B, Erşen E, Demirkaya A, Kara HV, Alizade N, İşcan M, Kaynak K, Turna A (2017) A prospective randomized trial comparing homologous and autologous fibrin sealants for the control of alveolar air leak. J Thorac Dis 9:2915–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Milenkovic B, Janjic SD, Popevic S (2018) Review of lung sealant technologies for lung volume reduction in pulmonary disease. Med Devices (Auckl) 11:225–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, Hogarth DK (2017) Management of persistent air leaks. Chest. 152:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belcher E, Dusmet M, Jordan S, Ladas G, Lim E, Goldstraw P (2010) A prospective, randomized trial comparing Bio Glue and Vivostat for the control of alveolar air leak. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moser C, Opitz I, Zhai W, Rousson V, Russi EW, Weder W, Lardinois D (2008) Autologous fibrin sealant reduces the incidence of prolonged air leak and duration of chest tube drainage after lung volume reduction surgery: a prospective randomized blinded study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:843–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Göttgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC (2011) Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39:575–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang H, Wang J, Yuan DF, Fang JW, Li Z (2015) Feasibility and safety of early chest tube removal after complete video-assisted thoracic lobectomy. Indian J Cancer 51(Suppl 2):e60–e62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B (2015) A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21:200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang R, Wu Y, Yao L, Xu J, Zhang S, Du C et al (2019) Risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications after minimally invasive anatomic resection for lung cancer. Ther Clin Risk Manag 15:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT (2007) American College of Chest Physicians. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced- based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, Ljungqvist O, Petersen RH, Popescu WM, Slinger PD, Naidu B (2019) Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 55:91–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belboul A, Dernevik L, Aljassim O, Skrbic B, Rådberg G, Roberts D (2004) The effect of autologous fibrin sealant (Vivostat) on morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective randomized, blinded study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:1187–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Bellanova C, Chiarugi M, Mingoli A, Olivero G et al (2018) A systematic review on the use of topical hemostats in trauma and emergency surgery. BMC Surg 18:68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moggia E, Rouse B, Simillis C, Li T, Vaughan J, Davidson BR et al (2016) Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD010683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bou Monsef J, Buckup J, Waldstein W, Cornell C, Boettner F (2014) Fibrin sealants or cell saver eliminate the need for autologous blood donation in anemic patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gidaro S, Cindolo L, Lipsky K, Zigeuner R, Schips L (2009) Efficacy and safety of the haemostasis achieved by Vivostat system during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 81:223–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carter G, Goss AN, Lloyd J, Tocchetti R (2003) Local haemostasis with autologous fibrin glue following surgical enucleation of a large cystic lesion in a therapeutically anticoagulated patient. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:275–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Belda-Sanchís J, Serra-Mitjans M, Iglesias Sentis M, Rami R (2010) Surgical sealant for preventing air leaks after pulmonary resections in patients with lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD003051

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Ersöz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ersöz, H., Şanlı, A., Karaçam, V. et al. Comparison of Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay in Pulmonary Resection Patients With and Without Autologous Fibrin Sealant: a Retrospective Descriptive Study. Indian J Surg 82, 264–270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02139-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-020-02139-5

Keywords

Navigation