Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Correlation and MRI Finding in the Management of Fistula in Ano

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fistula is considered to be any abnormal passage which connects two epithelial surfaces. Parks fistula classification demonstrates the biggest practical significance and divides fistulae into inter-sphincteric, trans-sphincteric, supra-sphincteric, and extra-sphincteric. Diagnostic method options are retrograde (RTG) fistulography, computed tomography (CT) fistulography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pelvic organs. The purpose of the study is to correlate clinical examination and operative findings with the findings of MRI and to draw efficacy of MRI as a preoperative diagnostic tool in the management of fistula in ano. This study was performed at the Surgery Department and MRI unit of the Radiology Department of JLNH and RC, Bhilai, from January 2014 to July 2015. Patients with perianal fistulae were included in our prospective study. All patients underwent high-spatial resolution MR imaging. MR imaging findings were correlated with the intraoperative surgical finding. MR imaging shows 7 fistulous patients with side branching and 16 with abscess cavity which was 100% intraoperatively correlated. Fifty-six patients out of 60 completely correlated with MRI for primary track which was clinically significant. MRI had 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for primary tract and internal opening and 100% sensitivity and specificity for abscess and multiple tracks. MRI is useful in successful treatment of perianal fistulae by providing more accurate anatomical information about the amount of sphincter above the track and the position and level of the internal opening, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful surgical treatment. So, MRI is the very important preoperative investigation tool for fistula in ano.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waniczek D, Adamczyk T, Arendt J, Kluczewska E, Kozińska-Marek E (2011) Usefulness assessment of preoperative MRI fistulography in patients with perianal fistulas. Pol J Radiol 76(4):40

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. George U, Sahota A, Rathore S (2011) MRI in evaluation of perianal fistula. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology 55(4):391–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management 1. Radiographics 20(3):623–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz DA, Pemberton JH, Sandborn WJ (2001) Diagnosis and treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn disease. Ann Intern Med 135(10):906–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhaya AK, Kumar N (2007) MRI with MR fistulogram for perianal fistula: a successful combination. Clin Gastrointest Magnetom 1(1):56–59

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khera PS, Badawi HA, Afifi AH (2010) MRI in perianal fistulae. The Indian journal of radiology & imaging 20(1):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63(1):1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. PHILLIPS R.K (2001) Anal fistula evaluation and management in: colorectal surgery, vol 12, 2nd edn. W.B. Saunders, Company limited, Philadelphia, pp 305–307

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yildirim N, Gökalp G, Öztürk E, Zorluoglu A, Yilmazlar T, Ercan I, Savci G (2012) Ideal combination of MRI sequences for perianal fistula classification and the evaluation of additional findings for readers with varying levels of experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 18(1):11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Miguel CJ, del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LF, Velasco LG, de las Vacas MI, Marco Sanz AG, Paradela MM, Moreno EF (2011) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32(1):175–194

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Malley RB, Al-Hawary MM, Kaza RK, Wasnik AP, Liu PS, Hussain HK (2012) Rectal imaging: part 2, perianal fistula evaluation on pelvic MRI??? What the radiologist needs to know. Am J Roentgenol 199(1):W43–W53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lima CM, Junqueira FP, Rodrigues MC, Gutierrez CA, Domingues RC, Coutinho Junior AC (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: iconographic essay. Radiol Bras 43(5):330–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Bartram CI, Cottam KS, Phillips RK (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 37(7):708–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Regina AM, Sainio P, Ward H (2001) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population: incidence and epidemiological aspects. Acta Chir Gynaecol 73:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scholefield JH, Berry DP, Armitage NC, Wastie ML (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula in ano. Int J Color Dis 12(5):276–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Halligan S, Stoker J (2006) Imaging of fistula in ano 1. Radiology 239(1):18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor AC, Ambrose NS (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 171(2):403–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Torkzad MR, Karlbom U (2010) MRI for assessment of anal fistula. Insights into imaging 1(2):62–71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Alaat El Essawy MT (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of anorectal fistulae and its role in management. J Gastroint Dig Syst 3(3):139

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, Kessels AG, Vliegen RF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? 1. Radiology 218(1):75–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasan DI, Ismail AA, Mohamed FF (2012) Value of magnetic resonance imaging in the surgical management of perianal fistulas. Med J Cairo Univ 80(1):895–901

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, J.L.N. Hospital and Research Centre, Sector 9 Dist.Durg, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, 490009, India

    Surajkumar Suresh Jajoo, Parag Gupta, K H Ramesh & R P Singh

Authors
  1. Surajkumar Suresh Jajoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parag Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K H Ramesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R P Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surajkumar Suresh Jajoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jajoo, S.S., Gupta, P., Ramesh, K.H. et al. Clinical Correlation and MRI Finding in the Management of Fistula in Ano. Indian J Surg 80, 347–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1607-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1607-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation