Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduced Port Thoracoscopic Surgery for Mediastinal and Pleural Disease: Experiences in a Single Institution

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present our current experience with reduced port thoracoscopic surgery (RPTS) for the treatment of mediastinal and pleural disease and thereafter discuss its indications and technical challenges. A total of 11 patients underwent surgery by the RPTS approach for the following conditions: thymoma (n = 2), bronchogenic cyst (n = 2), metastatic pleural tumor, thymic cyst, solitary fibrous tumor, pulmonary sequestration, pericardial cyst, neurinoma, and malignant lymphoma (n = 1). An Endo Relief forceps (Hope Denshi Co, Ltd, Chiba, Japan) was used for three of the surgical procedures. The elements of the data set consisted of gender, age, duration of operation, drain placement, hospital stay, mass location, and mass size. The median surgical time was 45 min (range, 40–78 min). There were no intraoperative complications and no need for a second surgery to open additional ports. The duration until chest tube removal was 1 day for all the cases. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3–6 days). The median mass size was 2.2 cm (range, 1.2–4.2 cm). The median length of skin incision was 2.0 cm (range, 2.0–3.5 cm). In conclusion, RPTS for mediastinal and pleural disease may be a possible alternative approach to conventional multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Although it is technically plausible and feasible for selected cases, the issues of patient acceptability and cosmetic and oncological results remain to be determined in the future with randomized-controlled trials and long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shigemura N, Akashi A, Nakagiri T, Ohta M, Matsuda H (2004) Complete versus assisted thoracoscopic approach: a prospective randomized trial comparing a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques. Surg Endosc 18:1492–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N (2001) Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 72:362–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, Dowling RD, Burke D, Gavlick J et al (1993) Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:1285–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A et al (2008) Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7:63–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E (2004) Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 77:726–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G (2005) Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlanga L, Gigirey O (2011) Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port: a feasible and safe procedure. Surg Endosc 25:2044–2047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen PR, Chen CK, Lin YS, Huang HC, Tsai JS, Chen CY et al (2011) Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Cardiothorac Surg 21(6):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishii M, Nishiyama T, Naganuma H, Kaneshiro M, Nakui M, Ozawa S et al (2012) Development of new small diameter forceps for reduced-port surgery. J Jpn Soc Endoscopic Surg 17(2):267–71

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez D, de la Torre M, Paradela M, Fernandez R, Delgado M, Garcia J et al (2011) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: 3-year initial experience with 200 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen YB, Wu YW, Yang WT, Shi L, Guo XF, Xu ZH et al (2009) Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J 122(13):1525–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CH, Lee SY, Chang H, Liu HC, Chen CH, Huang WC (2012) Technical aspects of single-port thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy. J Cardiothorac Surg 7:50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahn HY, Cho JS, Kim YD, Hoseok I, Lee J (2013) Single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for benign mediastinal disease: experiences in single institution. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46(5):388–90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Singhal S, Kaiser LR (2003) Comparison of stages I-II thymoma treated by complete resection with or without adjuvant radiation. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1635–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murakawa T, Nakajima J, Kohno T, Tanaka M, Matsumoto J, Takeuchi E et al (2000) Results from surgical treatment for thymoma. 43 years of experience. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 48:89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salati M, Brunelli A, Rocco G (2008) Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for diagnosis and treatment of intrathoracic conditions. Thorac Surg Clin 18(3):305–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Hashizume Y (2013) Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 12(8):153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaya Tamura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamura, M., Shimizu, Y. & Hashizume, Y. Reduced Port Thoracoscopic Surgery for Mediastinal and Pleural Disease: Experiences in a Single Institution. Indian J Surg 78, 173–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1333-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1333-5

Keywords

Navigation