Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seasonal Factors Influencing Copepod Abundance in the Maryland Coastal Bays

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maryland Coastal Bays differ in hydrography from river-dominated estuaries because of limited freshwater inflow from tributary creeks and more marine influence. Consequently, the copepod community structure may be different from that of the coastal ocean and river-dominated estuaries in the mid-Atlantic region. A 2-year study was conducted to describe copepod species composition and seasonal patterns in abundance and factors influencing the community structure. Seven copepod genera, Acartia, Centropages, Pseudodiaptomus, Parvocalanus, Eurytemora, Oithona, and Temora, in addition to harpacticoids were found. The copepod community was dominated by Acartia spp. (64%), followed by Centropages spp. (30%), unlike in river-dominated estuaries in the region where the copepod community is usually dominated by Acartia spp. followed by Eurytemora affinis. Acartia tonsa was the most abundant in summer and fall whereas Centropages spp., Temora sp., Oithona similis, E. affinis, and harpacticoids were most abundant in winter and early spring. Parvocalanus crassirostris and Pseudodiaptomus pelagicus were present in fall and winter but at relatively low densities. The highest mean density of copepods occurred in winter 2012 (36,437 m−3) and the lowest in spring 2013 (347 m−3). Low densities occurred through early summer (614 m−3) coinciding with peak spawning by bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli). Bottom-up control via low phytoplankton biomass coupled with top-down control by ctenophores (Mnemiopsis sp.), mysids (Neomysis americana), and bay anchovy was probably responsible for the low copepod densities in spring and early summer. Temperature and salinity were also important factors that influenced the seasonal patterns of copepod species occurrence. The observed seasonal differences in the abundance of copepods have important implications for planktivorous fishes as they may experience lower growth rates and survival due to food limitation in spring/early summer when copepod densities are relatively low than in late summer/fall when copepod abundance is higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaser, H.F., E. Jeppensen, and M. Sondergaard. 1995. Seasonal dynamics of the mysid Neomysis integer and its predation on copepod Eurytemora affinis in a shallow hypertrophic brackish lake. Marine Ecology Progress Series 127: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W.R., J.D. Hagy, L. Murray, C. Stokes, and W.M. Kemp. 1996. A comparative analysis of eutrophication patterns in a temperate coastal lagoon. Estuaries 19: 408–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B.P. (1991). Distribution of copepods in coastal zone waters: seasonal succession in Chesapeake Bay. Bulletin of the Plankton Society of Japan. Spec. Vol.: 129–131.

  • Burrell, V.G., Jr. (1968). The ecological significance of a ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi (A. Agassiz) in a fish nursery ground. M. S Thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 61p.

  • Burrell, V.G., Jr., and W.A. Van Engel. 1976. Predation by and distribution of a ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, in the York River estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 4 (3): 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buskey, E.J., and C.J. Hyatt. 1995. Effects of the Texas (USA) “brown tide” alga on planktonic grazers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J. and S. Doctor. 2004. Status of finfish populations in the Maryland Coastal Bays: ecosystem health assessment: monitoring Maryland’s coastal bays. Maryland Department of Natural Resources document number DNR-12-1202-0009.

  • Castel, J., and A. Feurtet. 1989. Dynamics of the copepod Eurytemora affinis hirundoides in the Gironde estuary: origin and fate of its production. In J. D. Ros (Ed.), Topics in marine biology, Scientia Marina, 53(2–3):577–584.

  • Castellani, C., and I.A.N. Lucas. 2003. Seasonal variation in egg morphology and hatching success in the calanoid copepods Temora longicornis, Acartia clausi and Centropages hamatus. Journal of Plankton Research 25: 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, L.E., J.D. Daiber, and E.M. Hulbert. 1962. Quantitative seasonal aspects of zooplankton in the Delaware River estuary. Chesapeake Science 3: 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, V., B. Sautour, R. Galois, and P. Chaddy. 2006. The paradox high zooplankton biomass–low vegetal particulate organic matter in high turbidity zones: what way for energy transfer? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 333: 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.S. 1987. Zooplankton life cycles. In Georges Bank, ed. R.A. Bakus and D.W. Bourne, 256–267. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.N., and H.G. Marshall. 1998. Mesozooplankton distribution and abundance in the Pagan River: a nutrient enriched sub-estuary of the James River, Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science 49 (3): 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deevey, G.B. 1956. Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. V. Zooplankton. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection 15: 113–155.

  • Deevey, G.B. 1960. The zooplankton of the surface waters of the Delaware Bay region. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection 17 (2): 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deonarine, S.N., C.J. Gobler, D.J. Lonsdale, and D.A. Caron. 2006. Role of zooplankton in the onset and demise of harmful brown tide blooms (Aureococcus anophagefferens) in US mid-Atlantic estuaries. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 44: 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, E.G., and M.C. Casas. 2006. Abundance and spatial distribution of copepods on Georges Bank during winter/spring period. Deep-Sea Research II 53: 2537–2569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, E., and J. Kane. 2007. Seasonal and spatial dynamics of Centropages typicus and C. hamatus in the western North Atlantic. Progress in Oceanography 72: 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, D.T., and K.W. Tang. 2011. Spatial and temporal distributions of live and dead copepods in the Lower Chesapeake Bay (Virginia, USA). Estuaries and Coasts 34: 1039–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, R.S. 1982. Preliminary results of an experimental study of the effects of mysid predation on estuarine zooplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia 93: 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, R.S. 1983. Interactive effects of temperature and predation on an estuarine zooplankton community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 72: 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastrich, M., and C.E. Wazniak. 2002. A brown tide bloom index based on the potential harmful effects of the brown tide alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens. Aquatic and Ecosystem Health Management 5: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P.M., C.E. Wazniak, M.R. Hall, and B. Sturgis. 2007. Seasonal and inter-annual trends in nitrogen and brown tide in Maryland’s Coastal Bays. Ecological Applications 17 (5): S79–S87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P.M., D.C. Hinkle, B. Sturgis, and R.V. Jesien. 2014. Eutrophication of a Maryland/Virginia coastal lagoon: a tipping point, ecosystem changes, and potential causes. Estuaries and Coasts 37 (suppl): S128–S146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gongalez, C.R., and B.P. Bradley. 1994. Salinity stress proteins in Eurytemora affinis. Hydrobiologia 292 (293): 461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, K.J., J. Howell, and J.A. Sweka. 2004. Diet and daily ration of bay anchovy in the Hudson River, New York. American Fisheries Society 133: 762–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J. 1997. Persistent spatial and temporal abundance patterns for late-stage copepodites of Centropages hamatus (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the U.S. northeast continental shelf ecosystem. Fishery Bulletin 95 (1): 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J. 2011. Interdecadal variability of zooplankton abundance in the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 43: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J., and J. Prezioso. 2008. Distribution and multi-annual abundance trends of the copepod Temora longicornis in the US northeast shelf ecosystem. Journal of Plankton Research 30 (5): 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. W., Bartleson, R., S. Blumenshine, J. D. Hagey, & Boynton, W. R. 2000. Ecosystem models of the Chesapeake Bay relating nutrient loadings, environmental conditions, and living resources Technical Report. pp. 102–122.

  • Kimmel, D.G., and B.P. Bradley. 2001. Specific protein responses in the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880) to salinity and temperature variation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 266: 135–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, D.G., and M. Roman. 2004. Long-term trends in mesozooplankton abundance in Chesapeake Bay, USA: influence of freshwater input. Marine Ecology Progress Series 267: 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, D.G., M.R. Roman, and X. Zhang. 2006. Spatial and temporal variability in factors affecting mesozooplankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay: evidence from biomass size spectra. Limnology and Oceanography 51 (1): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, D.G., W.R. Boynton, and M.R. Roman. 2012. Long-term decline in the calanoid Acartia tonsa in central Chesapeake Bay, USA: an indirect effect of eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science 101: 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klebasko, M. J. (1991). Feeding ecology and daily ration of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) in the mid-Chesapeake Bay. M.S. Thesis University of Maryland, College Park, 103 pp.

  • Knatz, G. 1978. Succession of copepod species in a middle Atlantic estuary. Estuaries 1: 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D., I. Valiela, and G. Tomasky. 2004. Estuarine calanoid copepod abundance in relation to season, salinity, and land-derived nitrogen loading, Waquoit Bay, MA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 61: 547–557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., and S. Brandt. 1993. Bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchelli) production and consumption in mid-Chesapeake Bay based on a bioenergetics model and acoustic measures of fish abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 98 (3): 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M.A. 1991. Zooplankton abundance and community structure in a mesohaline North Carolina estuary. Estuaries 14 (4): 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, N.H. 1989. Abundance in bottom sediments and hatching requirements of eggs of Centropages hamatus (Copepoda: Calanoida) from Alligator Harbor region, Florida. Biological Bulletin 176: 142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, E.D. (2015). Population dynamics of mysids and their role in the trophic ecology of fishes in Maryland Coastal Bays. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 199pp.

  • Murphy, R.F., and D.H. Secor. 2005. Fish and blue crab assemblage structure in a U.S. mid-Atlantic coastal lagoon complex. Estuaries and Coasts 29 (6B): 1121–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oseji, O.F. (2015). The influence of environmental factors and land use type on phytoplankton dynamics in Maryland Coastal Bays and Chesapeake Bay tributaries. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, 200pp.

  • Pincin, J., M.J. Wilberg, and L. Harris. 2014. Trends in abundance indices of fishes in Maryland’s Coastal Bays during 1972–2009. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 791–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plourde, S., J.J. Dodson, J.A. Runge, and J. Therriault. 2002. Spatial and temporal variation in copepod community structure in the lower St. Lawrence Estuary, Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 230: 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J.E., and J.H. Cowan Jr. 1995. Predation by the scyphomedusan Chrysaora quinquecirrha on Mnemiopsis leidyi ctenophores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 128: 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J.E., and M.B. Decker. 2005. Effects of climate on relative predation by scyphomedusae and ctenophores on copepods in Chesapeake Bay during 1987–2000. Limnology and Oceanography 50: 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, M.R., A.L. Guazens, W.K. Rhinehart, and J.R. White. 1993. Effects of low-oxygen waters on Chesapeake Bay zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 38: 1603–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, M., X. Zhang, C. McGilliard, and W. Boicourt. 2005. Seasonal and annual variability in the spatial patterns of plankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay. Limnology and Oceanography 50 (2): 480–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saba, G.K., D.K. Steinberg, D.A. Bronk, and A.R. Place. 2011. The effects of harmful algal species and food concentration on zooplankton grazer production of dissolved organic matter and inorganic nutrients. Harmful Algae 10: 291–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, L.E., and S.S. Herman. 1972. Zooplankton of the Sandy Hook Bay area, N. J. Chesapeake Science 13: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sautour, B., and J. Castel. 1995. Comparative spring distribution of zooplankton in three macrotidal European estuaries. Hydrobiologia 311: 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, F.J. 1964. Fishes of Isle of Wight and Assawoman bays near Ocean City, Maryland. Chesapeake Science 5: 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, P.A., and F.W. Steimle. 1995. Trends in copepod communities in Navesink and Shrewsbury Rivers, New Jersey: 1962–1992. Estuaries 18 (1B): 250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, K., W.G. Smith, J.R. Green, E.B. Cohen, M.S. Berman, K.A. Marti, and J.R. Goulet. 1987. Zooplankton production and the fisheries of the northeastern shelf. In Georges Bank, ed. R.A. Bakus and D.W. Bourne, 268–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiganova, T.A. 1998. Invasion of the black sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fisheries Oceanography 7: 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetaert, K., and P. Van Rijswijk. 1993. Spatial and temporal patterns of the zooplankton in the Westerschelde estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 97: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B.K., and L.T. McManus. 1986. Factors controlling seasonal succession of the copepods Acartia hudsonica and A. tonsa in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island: temperature and resting egg production. Marine Ecology Progress Series 28: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trice, T.M., P.M. Gilbert, and L. Van Heukelem. 2004. HPLC pigment records provide evidence of past blooms of Aureococcus anophagefferens in the coastal bays of Maryland and Virginia, USA. Harmful Algae 3: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.T. 1982. The annual cycle of zooplankton in a Long Island Estuary. Estuaries 5 (4): 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte, I., and F. Villate. 2004. Effects of pollution on zooplankton abundance and distribution in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay). Marine Pollution Bulletin 49: 220–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wazniak, C., and P.M. Glibert. 2004. Potential impacts of brown tide, Aureococcus anophagefferens, on juvenile hard clams, Mercenaria mercenaria, in the coastal bays of Maryland, USA. Harmful Algae 3: 321–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazi, I. 1966. Zooplankton communities of the Navesink and Shrewsbury Rivers and Sandy Hook Bay, New Jersey. Bur. Sport Fish. Wildlife Technical paper 2: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, M., F. Rodriguez, and J.L. Garrido. 2000. Separation of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton: a new HPLC method using a reversed phase C-8 column and pyridine-containing mobile phases. Marine Ecology Progress Series 195: 29–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by NSF grant # 103658 to CREST–Center for the Integrated Study of Coastal Ecosystem Processes and Dynamics in the Mid-Atlantic Region at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and in part by the NOAA Educational Partnership Program grant # NA11SEC4810002. We would like to thank Jamie Pierson for his valuable comments on the earlier draft of this work and Capt. Christopher Daniels (Boat captain), Andres Morales-Nunez, Kingsley Nkeng, Chinwe Otuya, Abena Okyere Acheampong, and Jessica Mazile for help with collection and enumeration of plankton samples. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. Mysid data were provided by Ejiroghene Mayor, and bay anchovy data were provided by Steve B. Doctor, Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulinus Chigbu.

Additional information

Communicated by David G. Kimmel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oghenekaro, E.U., Chigbu, P., Oseji, O.F. et al. Seasonal Factors Influencing Copepod Abundance in the Maryland Coastal Bays. Estuaries and Coasts 41, 495–506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0285-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0285-3

Keywords

Navigation