Abstract
Smallholder farmers in the Venezuelan Andes have observed that native Solanum tuberosum ssp. Andigenum (Andigena) potato varieties are less susceptible to damage from the invasive pest, Tecia solanivora P. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) than improved varieties. Surprisingly, the value of using Andigena varieties in the management of T. solanivora remains unexplored. Field trials were established in Misinta, Venezuela, to assess T. solanivora damage on potatoes from an Andigena variety, ‘Imilla negra’, and two improved varieties, ‘Andinita’ and ‘Unica’. The influence of intercropped Imilla negra varieties on T. solanivora damage and marketable yield in neighboring improved potato varieties was also assessed. While Imilla negra had significantly less T. solanivora damage per plant (percentage of damaged tubers) and per tuber (number of larval exit perforations) than Andinita and Unica in monoculture trials, intercropped Imilla negra did not reduce T. solanivora damage or increase undamaged tuber yield of improved varieties in polycultures. The results support Andean farmer knowledge on Andigena potato varieties and suggest that the proper incorporation of these varieties into potato cropping systems might be a promising strategy in managing T. solanivora. Nevertheless, further evaluation extending beyond a single growing season is needed to validate the findings of this study over time, as year to year variability in environmental conditions can alter host plant preference in herbivorous insects.
Resumen
Los agricultores minifundistas en los Andes venezolanos han observado que las variedades nativas de papa Solanum tuberosum ssp. andígenum (Andígena) son menos susceptibles al daño por la plaga invasiva Tecia solanivora P. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) que las variedades mejoradas. Sorpresivamente, el valor del uso de las variedades Andígena en el manejo de T. solanivora permanece inexplorado. Se establecieron experimentos de campo en Misinta, Venezuela, para analizar el daño por T. solanivora en papas de la variedad Andígena “Imilla negra”, y dos variedades mejoradas, “Andinita” y “Unica”. También se evaluó la influencia de las variedades Imilla negra intercultivadas sobre el daño por T. solanivora y sobre el rendimiento comercial en variedades de papa mejoradas vecinas. Mientras que Imilla negra tuvo significativamente menos daño por T. solanivora por planta (porcentaje de tubérculos dañados) y por tubérculo (número de perforaciones de salida de las larvas) que Andinita y Unica en ensayos de monocultivo, Imilla negra intercalada no redujo el daño por T. solanívora o aumentó el rendimiento de tubérculo no dañado de las variedades mejoradas en policultivos. Los resultados respaldan el conocimiento del agricultor Andino respecto a las variedades Andígenas de papa, y sugieren que la correcta incorporación de estas variedades en los sistemas de cultivo de la papa pudiera ser una estrategia prometedora en el manejo de T. solanivora. No obstante, se requiere de evaluación posterior que se extienda más allá de un solo ciclo de cultivo, para validar lo que se encontró en este estudio sobre el tiempo, como la variabilidad de año a año en las condiciones ambientales que puedan alterar la preferencia de planta hospedante en insectos herbívoros.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altieri, M.A. 2004. Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 35–42.
Banks, J.E. 1998. The scale of landscape fragmentation affects herbivore response to vegetation heterogeneity. Oecologia 117: 239–246.
Barbosa, P., J. Hines, I. Kaplan, H. Martinson, A. Szczepaniec, and Z. Szendrei. 2009. Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 1–20.
Bottrell, D.G., P. Barbosa, and F. Gould. 1998. Manipulating natural enemies by plant variety selection and modification: a realistic strategy? Annual Review of Entomology 43: 347–367.
Brush, S.B., H.J. Carney, and Z. Humán. 1981. Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Economic Botany 35: 70–88.
Brush, S.B., J.E. Taylor, and M.R. Bellon. 1992. Technology adoption and biological diversity in Andean potato agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 39: 365–387.
Cantelo, W., and L. Sanford. 1984. Insect population response to mixed and uniform plantings of resistant and susceptible plant material. Environmental Entomology 13: 1443–1445.
Classen, A., M.K. Peters, S.W. Ferger, M. Helbig-Bonitz, J.M. Schmack, G. Maassen, M. Schleuning, E.K. Kalko, K. Böhning-Gaese, and I. Steffan-Dewenter. 2014. Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(20): 133–148.
Cole, C., and H. Howard. 1962. The effect of growing resistant potatoes on a potato-root eelworm population—a microplot experiment. The Annals of Applied Biology 50: 121–127.
Dangles, O., V. Mesías, V. Crespo-Perez, and J. Silvain. 2009. Crop damage increases with pest species diversity: evidence from potato tuber moths in the tropical Andes. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1115–1121.
Dias, M.C., I.L. Conceição, I. Abrantes, and M.J. Cunha. 2012. Solanum sisymbriifolium-a new approach for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes. European Journal of Plant Pathology 133: 171–179.
Fischl, G. 1991. Differences in susceptibility of some potato varieties to Phoma exigua var. foveata foist in laboratory test. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 26: 295–301.
Foster, S.P., and M.O. Harris. 1997. Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest-management. Annual Review of Entomology 42(1): 123–146.
Gómez Jiménez, M.I., and K. Poveda. 2009. Synergistic effects of repellents and attractants in potato tuber moth control. Basic and Applied Ecology 10: 763–769.
Harmon, J.P., E.E. Hladilek, J.L. Hinton, T.J. Stodola, and D. Andow. 2003. Herbivore response to vegetational diversity: spatial interaction of resources and natural enemies. Population Ecology 45: 75–81.
Hilje, L. 1994. Characterization of the damage by the potato moths Tecia solanivora and Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: gelechiidae) in Cartago, Costa Rica. Manejo Integrado Plagas 31: 43–46.
Jezorek, H., P. Stiling, and J. Carpenter. 2011. Ant predation on an invasive herbivore: can an extrafloral nectar-producing plant provide associational resistance to opuntia individuals? Biological Invasions 13: 2261–2273.
Jiménez, M., A. Rossi, and N. Sammán. 2009. Phenotypic, agronomic and nutritional characteristics of seven varieties of Andean potatoes. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 22: 613–616.
Johnson, M.T. 2008. Bottom-up effects of plant genotype on aphids, ants, and predators. Ecology 89: 145–154.
Karlsson, M.F., G. Birgersson, A.M. Cotes Prado, F. Bosa, M. Bengtsson, and P. Witzgall. 2009. Plant odor analysis of potato: response of Guatemalan moth to above-and belowground potato volatiles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 5903–5909.
Khan, Z.R., and J.A. Pickett. 2004. The “push-pull”strategy for stemborer management: a case study in exploiting biodiversity and chemical ecology. Ecological Engineering for Pest Management Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods 155–164.
Legrand, A., and P. Barbosa. 2003. Plant morphological complexity impacts foraging efficiency of adult Coccinella septempunctata L. (coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 32: 1219–1226.
Mohammed, A., D. Douches, W. Pett, E. Grafius, J. Coombs, J. Liswidowati, W. Li, and M. Madkour. 2000. Evaluation of potato tuber moth (Lepidoptera: gelechiidae) resistance in tubers of Bt-cry5 transgenic potato lines. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 472–476.
Molet, R.T. 2012. CPHST pest datasheet for tecia solanivora. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST.
European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Agency. 2005. Data sheets on quarantine pests: tecia solanivora. bull. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 35: 399–401.
Osypchuk, A., B. Taktaev, D. Sigareva, and L. Pylypenko. 2002. Breeding for resistance to the potato cyst nematode in Ukraine. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 38: 158–159.
Poveda, K., M.I.G. Jiménez, and A. Kessler. 2010. The enemy as ally: herbivore-induced increase in crop yield. Ecological Applications 20: 1787–1793.
Ratnadass, A., P. Fernandes, J. Avelino, and R. Habib. 2012. Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32: 273–303.
Rivera, M.J., and H.J. Burrack. 2012. Host utilization is mediated by movement of pre-feeding Phthorimaea operculella larvae in the Nicotiana tabacum agroecosystem. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 145: 153–161.
Romero, L., and M. Monasterio. 2005. Papas negras, papas de páramo. Bol. Antropológico 23(64): 107–138.
Salas, J., and W. Franco. 2003. Plan nacional de semilla de papa 2003–2006. instituto Nacional de investigaciones Agrícolas. Venezuela: Mérida.
SAS Institute. 2007. SAS 9.3 help and documentation, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2004.
Shelton, A., and F. Badenes-Perez. 2006. Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 285–308.
Tahvanainen, J.O., and R.B. Root. 1972. The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (coleoptera: chrysomelidae). Oecologia 10: 321–346.
Thiele, G. 1999. Informal potato seed systems in the Andes: why are they important and what should we do with them? World Development 27: 83–99.
Tooker, J.F., and S.D. Frank. 2012. Genotypically diverse cultivar mixtures for insect pest management and increased crop yields. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 974–985.
Toxopeus, H., and C. Huijsman. 1952. Genotypical background of resistance to Heterodera rostochiensis in Solanum tuberosum, var. andigenum. Nature 170: 1016.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Onias Rivera of Misintá, Venezuela, for his support, assistance, and input in the development of our experimental potato plots. We thank Ilka Dominguez of the Institute of Agricultural Research at the University of the Andes in Mérida for her help in obtaining T. solanivora larvae. A many thanks to Moises Escalona, Adrian Gonzalez, and Rafael Pacheco for their assistance in the field and lab. We also thank D. Letourneau, S. Philpott, P. Barbosa, E. Velazquez, T. Cornelisse, E. Olimpi, M. Cely Santos, E. Jimenez, and H. Cohen for their many helpful comments and suggestions on this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by grants from Annie’s Homegrown, Earthbound Farm Organic, and through the University of California President’s Dissertation Year Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moreno, C.R., London, M.S. & Gliessman, S.R. Influence of a Native Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigenum Potato Variety on Management of the Guatemalan Potato Moth in the Venezuelan Andes. Am. J. Potato Res. 93, 224–230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9498-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-016-9498-4