Summary
This paper clarifies the typification of three Caucasian species of Pyrus. Lectotypes are designated here for Pyrus georgica, P. demetrii and P. fedorovii described by Schuschana Kuthatheladze from Georgia. A brief explanation of the reasoning behind the choice of specimen is given for each typification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Browicz, K. (1993). Conspect and chorology of the genus Pyrus L. Arbor. Kornickie 38: 17 – 33.
Ketskovelli, N. (1980). Pyrus. In: A. Kharadze & R. Gagnidze (eds), Flora of Georgia, 6: 38 (in Georgian).
Kuthatheladze, S. (1939). Generis pyri E Georgia orientali species nova. Zametki Sist. Geogr. Rast. 8: 13 – 21.
____ (1947). Generis pyri species novae (Sect. Xeropyrenia A. Fed.) E Georgia oriental. Zametki Sist. Geogr. Rast 13: 23 – 30.
Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species plantarum, vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm.
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, D. L., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud'Homme Van Reine, W. F., Smith, J. F. & Wiersema, J. H. (eds) (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) (Turkish version: Menemen, Y., Dönmez, A. A. 2015), Regnum Veg. 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) (Project No: 111 T 850) for financial support. The authors also express their gratitude to the curators of the herbaria mentioned and Nikoloz Lachashrili and Dr Tinatin Barblishvili for kind help and Erik Emanuelsson of UPS for providing images of Pyrus georgica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aydın, Z.U., Dönmez, A.A. Lectotypification of three names in Pyrus (Rosaceae). Kew Bull 71, 37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-016-9647-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-016-9647-4