Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploration of microbial communities in the guts and casts of Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus, and Eisenia fetida

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthworms and their casts have been widely used for organic waste degradation and plant growth promotion. The microbial communities that reside in the guts and casts of earthworms markedly influence both applications. In the present study, next-generation sequencing was applied to identify the microbial communities in the guts and casts of three epigeic earthworm species, Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus, and Eisenia fetida, reared under two different feeding conditions. A total of 580 genera belonging to 43 phyla were identified. By comparing bacterial diversity among samples divided into groups based on the earthworm species, sample types, and conditions, the beta diversity analysis supported the impact of the sample type and suggested that there was significant dissimilarity of the bacterial diversity between the gut and cast. Besides, bacterial Phylum compositions within the group were compared. The result showed that the top three high relative frequency phyla found in the casts were the same regardless of earthworm species, while those found in the gut depended on both the condition and earthworm species. Focusing on the cellulolytic and plant growth-promoting bacteria, certain cellulolytic bacteria, Paenibacillus, Comamonas, and Cytophaga, were found only in the cast. Citrobacter and Streptomyces aculeolatus were detected only in the guts of earthworms reared in the bedding containing vegetables and bedding alone, respectively. Besides, Actinomadura and Burkholderia were detected only in the gut of E. eugeniae and E. fetida, respectively. The results proved that the microbial composition was affected by sample type, condition, and earthworm species. In addition, the proportion of these beneficial bacteria was also influenced by these factors. Hence, the information from this study can be used as a guide for selecting earthworm species or their casts for more efficient organic waste decomposition and plant growth promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamidele JA, Idowu AB, Ademolu KO, Atayese AO (2014) Microbial diversity and digestive enzyme activities in the gut of earthworms found in sawmill industries in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Rev Biol Trop 62:1241–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Knight R, Huttley GA, Caporaso JG (2018) Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR et al (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brito-Vega H, Espinosa-Victoria D (2009) Bacterial diversity in the digestive tract of earthworms (Oligochaeta). J Biol Sci 9:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byzov BA, Nechitaylo T, Bumazhkin BK, Kurakov AV, Golyshin PN, Zvyagintsev DG (2009) Culturable microorganisms from the earthworm digestive tract. Microbiology 78:360–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M et al (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan A, Kumar S, Singh AP, Gupta M (2010) Vermicomposting of vegetable wastes with cowdung using three earthworm species Eisenia foetida, Eudrilus eugeniae and Perionyx excavatus. Nat Sci 8:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez J, Gómez-Brandón M (2012) Vermicomposting: composting with earthworms to recycle organic wastes In: Dr. Sunil Kumar (Ed) Management of Organic Waste, InTech, London, pp 2–20

  • Gómez-Brandón M, Lores M, Domĭnguez J (2012) Species-specific effects of epigeic earthworms on microbial community structure during first stages of decomposition of organic matter. PLoS ONE 7:e31895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grdiša M, Grsic K, Grdisa M (2013) Earthworms — role in soil fertility to the use in medicine and as a food. Invertebr Surviv J 10:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang K, Li F, Wei Y, Chen X, Fu X (2013) Changes of bacterial and fungal community compositions during vermicomposting of vegetable wastes by Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 150:235–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katheem KS, Jessy RS, Ibrahim MH (2014) Earthworm’s gut as reactor in vermicomposting process: a mini review. Int J Sci Res Publ 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monroy F, Aira M, Domínguez J (2009) Reduction of total coliform numbers during vermicomposting is caused by short-term direct effects of earthworms on microorganisms and depend on the dose of application of pig slurry. Sci Total Environ 407:5411–5416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton JT, Sanders J, Quinn RA et al (2017) Balance trees reveal microbial niche differentiation. Msystems 2:e00162-e1116. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00162-16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Munnoli PM, Teixeira da Silva JA, Bhosle S (2010) Dynamics of the soil-earthworm-plant relationship: a review. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 4:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan N, Gajendran M (2014) Vermiconversion of paper mill sludge for recycling the nutrients using earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 8:6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechitaylo TY, Yakimov MM, Godinho M, Timmis KN, Belogolova E, Byzov BA, Kurakov AV, Jones DL, Golyshin PN (2010) Effect of the earthworms Lumbricus terrestris and Aporrectodea caliginosa on bacterial diversity in soil. Microb Ecol 59:574–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nozaki M, Miura C, Tozawa Y, Miura T (2009) The contribution of endogenous cellulase to the cellulose digestion in the gut of earthworm (Pheretima hilgendorfi: Megascolecidae). Soil Biol Biochem 41:762–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi K, Jayanthi L, Soniya MA, Sekar J, Basha SA (2014) Efficiency of Perionyx excavatus (perrier) in litter (Anacardium occidium L.) decomposition and nutrient mineralization. Int J Mod Res Rev 2:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi K, Ranganathan LS, Anandi V, Zeyer J (2007) Diversity of microflora in the gut and casts of tropical composting earthworms reared on different substrates. J Environ Biol 28:87–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pathma J, Sakthivel N (2012) Microbial diversity of vermicompost bacteria that exhibit useful agricultural traits and waste management potential. Springer plus 1:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP (2010) FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5:e9490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: www.R-project.org

  • Shamseldin A (2013) The role of different genes involved in symbiotic nitrogen fixation — review. Global J Biotechnol Biochem 8:84–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springer plus 2:587. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shweta M (2012) Cellulolysis: a transient property of earthworm or symbiotic/ingested microorganisms? Int J Sci Res Publ 2:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Surat W, Mhuantong W, Sangsrakru D, Chareonviriyaphap T, Arunyawat U, Kubera A, Sittivicharpinyo T, Siripan O, Pootakham W (2016) Gut bacterial diversity in Plasmodium-infected and Plasmodium-uninfected Anopheles minimus. Chiang Mai J Sci 43:427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar B, Shanmugasundaram P, Menaga SV, Sujatha R, Anandhi VA (2009) Study on isolation and characterization of earthworm gut flora of Perionyx excavatus. Biomed Pharmacol J 2:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CM, Shyu CL, Ho SP, Chiou SH (2008) Characterization of a novel thermophilic, cellulose-degrading bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B39. Lett App Microbiol 47:46–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Lewis J, Hoffmann C, Chen Y-Y, Knight R, Bittinger K, Hwang J, Chen J, Berkowsky R, Nessel L, Li H, Bushman FD (2010) Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags. BMC Microbiol 10:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yuvaraj A, Thangaraj R, Maheswaran R (2019) Decomposition of poultry litter through vermicomposting using earthworm Drawida sulcata and its effect on plant growth. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:7241–7254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Assoc. Professor Somchai Chantsavang for providing all earthworm samples and suggesting how to rear and identify these earthworm species.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (ว-ท(ด)112.58).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

    Passorn Wonnapinij, Ajaraporn Sriboonlert & Wunrada Surat

  2. Omics Center for Agriculture, Bioresources, Food and Health, Kasetsart University (OmiKU), Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

    Passorn Wonnapinij

Authors
  1. Passorn Wonnapinij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ajaraporn Sriboonlert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wunrada Surat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wunrada Surat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 67 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wonnapinij, P., Sriboonlert, A. & Surat, W. Exploration of microbial communities in the guts and casts of Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus, and Eisenia fetida. Folia Microbiol 67, 329–337 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-00948-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-00948-7

Search

Navigation