Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mothproofing Protection of Wool Fabric Against A. verbasci Using Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Pinus brutia Extracts Through Pentagonal Design

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodegradable materials of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Pinus brutia were applied in this research to protect wool fabrics against Anthrenus verbasci. To do so, alcoholic extraction of the aforementioned compounds was first carried out and then, preventive protection and optimization of wool fabric mothproofing property, using pentagonal design and response surface method, was conducted; up to now, such a process was not reported and presented. Vicinity time and concentrations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Pinus brutia extracts were considered as independent variables, and efficiency of mothproofing property through wool destruction amounts was assumed as the dependent variable. Quadratic statistical models and optimized conditions of wool protection against A. verbasci were obtained and meticulously examined. The results revealed that alcoholic extraction is an efficient method to extract the effective materials of Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Pinus brutia, which are environmentally-friendly compounds, and that Eucalyptus camaldulensis is an excellent protection against A. verbasci, more so than the other compounds utilized in this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Jose, S. Nachimuthu, S. Das, and A. Kumar, J. Text. Inst., 109, 225 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. W. S. Hearle, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 27, 123 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. D. Cox and D. B. Pinniger, J. Stored Prod. Res., 43, 2 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. F. Coleman, J. Chem. Educ., 82, 1324 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Y. Ki, J. H. Kim, S. C. Kwon, and S. H. Jeong, J. Mater. Sci., 42, 8020 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Kumar, P. K. Pareek, V. V. Kadam, and D. B. Shakyawar, Indian J. Tradit. Knowl., 15, 272 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. B. Shakyawar, A. S. M. Raja, A. Kumar, and P. K. Pareek, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 40, 200 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Shinohara, K. Ono, and M. Gamo, Indoor Air, 18, 63 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Haji, S. Ashraf, M. Nasiriboroumand, and C. Lievens, Fiber. Polym., 21, 743 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Singh, P. Mathur, N. Singh, and J. Sheikh, Sustain. Chem. Pharm., 14, 100184 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Karabulut and R. Atav, Fiber. Polym., 21, 1773 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Yu, H. He, J. Liu, Y. Li, X. Lin, C. Zhang, and M. Li, Cellulose, 27, 1829 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Y. Wang and C. W. Kan, Cellulose, 27, 9045 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. E. Musa, B. Madhan, S. V. Kanth, J. R. Rao, B. Chandrasekaran, and G. A. Gasmelseed, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 12, 381 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Goulart, L. J. J. Nieves, A. G. Dal Bó, and A. M. Bernardin, Dyes Pigm., 182, 108654 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Yusuf, A. Ahmad, M. Shahid, M. I. Khan, S. A. Khan, N. Manzoor, and F. Mohammad, J. Clean. Prod., 27, 42 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Nazari, M. Montazer, and M. Dehghani-Zahedani, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 16, 1675 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Nazari, J. Text. Inst., 108, 755 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. B. Shakyawar, A. S. M. Raja, A. Kumar, and P. K. Pareek, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 40, 220 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. A. Popovici, D. Vaduva, I. Pinzaru, C. A. Dehelean, C. G. Farcas, D. Coricovac, C. Danciu, I. Popescu, E. Alexa, V. Lazureanu, and H. T. Stanca, Exp. Ther. Med., 18, 932 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Abdi, M. Mahdavi-Ourtakand, and S. Honarmand-Jahromy, Iran J. Med. Microbiol., 13, 220 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. R. Obead, Plant Archives, 19, 1850 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Kato, T. Hata, and M. Tsukada, Jpn. Agric. Res. Q., 38, 241 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Nazari, M. Montazer, and M. Dehghani-Zahedani, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 1365 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Nazari, M. Montazer, F. Jafari, and M. Dehghani-Zahedani, J. Text. Inst., 105, 74 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Nazari, M. Montazer, and M. Dehghani-Zahedani, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20, 4207 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O. Joharchi, A. Nazari, B. Halliday, and H. Ostovan, Persian J. Acarol., 4, 329 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Dehghani-Zahedani, A. Nazari, and A. Sarafrazi, J. Entomol. Res., 42, 5 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Ben Abdelmalek, I. Essid, S. Smeti, and N. Atti, Small Rumin. Res., 168, 87 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Bendif, M. Boudjeniba, M. D. Miara, L. Biqiku, M. Bramucci, G. Caprioli, G. Lupidi, L. Quassinti, G. Sagratini, L. A. Vitali, S. Vittori, and F. Maggi, Food Chem., 218, 78 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Selmi, K. Rtibi, D. Grami, H. Sebai, and L. Marzouki, Pathophysiology, 24, 297 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Tai, S. Cheung, M. Wu, and D. Hasman, Phytomedicine, 19, 436 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. B. Bozin, N. Mimica-Dukic, I. Samojlik, and E. Jovin, J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 7879 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Munné-Bosch and L. Alegre, Plant Physiol., 125, 1094 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. D. R. Batish, H. P. Singh, and R. K. Kohli, and S. Kaur, For. Ecol. Manag., 256, 2166 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. R. G. Bachir and M. Benali, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 2, 739 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. L. Harkat-Madouri, B. Asma, K. Madani, Z. B. O. S. Said, P. Rigou, D. Grenier, H. Allalou, H. Remini, A. Adjaoud, and L. Boulekbache-Makhlouf, Ind. Crops Prod., 78, 148 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. D. J. Bhuyan, Q. V. Vuong, A. C. Chalmers, I. A. Van Altena, M. C. Bowyer, and C. J. Scarlett, S. Afr. J. Bot., 112, 180 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. H. Chograni, L. Riahi, S. Dhahri, O. Ezzine, H. Chakroun, and C. Messaoud, J. Complement. Integr. Med., doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2019-0159 (2020).

  40. B. Ben Fadhel, A. Aissi, N. Ladhari, M. Deghrigue, R. Chemli, and J.-P. Joly, J. Text. Inst., 103, 1197 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. P. B. Arcuri, M. L. Thonney, P. Schofield, and A. N. Nelson-Pell, Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 38, 1073 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. B. Ben Fadhel, A. Aissi, N. Ladhari, M. Deghrigue, R. Chemli, and J.-P. Joly, J. Text. Inst., 103, 1197 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. F. Erler, I. Ulug, and B. Yalcinkaya, Fitoterapia, 77, 491 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. A. Lucia, P. G. Audino, E. Seccacini, S. Licastro, E. Zerba, and H. Masuh, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 23, 299 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Negahban and S. Moharramipour, J. Appl. Entomol., 131, 256 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. S. Nathan, Bioresour. Technol., 98, 1856 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Rajendran and V. Sriranjini, J. Stored Prod. Res., 44, 126 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. X. Liu, Q. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Xie, and Z. Xu, Frontiers of Forestry in China, 3, 232 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. H. P. Singh, D. R. Batish, N. Setia, and R. K. Kohli, Ann. Appl. Biol., 146, 89 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Art & Architecture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, 8915813135, Iran

    Ali Nazari & Abolfazl Davodi-Roknabadi

  2. Department of Art & Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, 1131833116, Iran

    Azadeh Matin-Moghadam

  3. Department of Agriculture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, 8915813135, Iran

    Mehdi Dehghani-Zahedani

Authors
  1. Ali Nazari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abolfazl Davodi-Roknabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Azadeh Matin-Moghadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehdi Dehghani-Zahedani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ali Nazari or Abolfazl Davodi-Roknabadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazari, A., Davodi-Roknabadi, A., Matin-Moghadam, A. et al. Mothproofing Protection of Wool Fabric Against A. verbasci Using Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Pinus brutia Extracts Through Pentagonal Design. Fibers Polym 23, 136–147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0292-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0292-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation