Skip to main content
Log in

Electrophotographic printing of fabrics: Investigating the effect of fabrics on color reproduction

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fabric printing systems are essentially needed nowadays and should meet the requirements of manufacturers. Digital electrophotographic (Xerographic) printing has the potential of meeting these requirements. Digital electrophotography printing is affected by several parameters, including printer and substrate type which determine the final printed color gamut and the quality of reproduction. To examine these effects, we performed different tests on a number of printed common fabrics. The gamut volume was generated by Eye-One spectrophotometer, ProfileMaker, and ColorThink software. The results indicated that all fabrics cannot be printed with electrophotography. Also, the gamut volume of the printed fabrics was low. Properties of different types of fabric were investigated by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, spectrophotometer, and fabrics-specific tests (fastness).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. H. Momin, Ph.D. Dissertation, RMIT University, Melburne, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. W. Carr, F. L. Cook, H. Yan, and P. H. Pfromm, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81, 2399 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. W. Carr, D. S. Sarma, L. Cook, S. Shi, L. Wang, and P. H. Pfromm, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 78, 2425 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Ohta and M. Rosen, “Color Desktop Printer Technology”, pp.157–195, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. F. Carlson, “Xerography, a New Industry”, p.10, Photographic Age, USA, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. W. Carr, F. L. Cook, W. R. Lanigan, M. E. Sikorski, and W. C. Tincher, Text. Chem. Color, 23, 33 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Leach and R. Pierce, “The Printing Ink Manual”, p.54, Springer, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Marshall, “Recent Progress in Toner Technology”, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Kipphan, “Handbook of Print Media: Technologies and Production Method”, pp.677–756, Springer, New York, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. W. W. Carr, D. S. Sarma, F. L. Cook, S. Shi, L. Wang, and P. H. Pfromm, J. Electrostat., 45, 249 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Park and W. W. Carr, Text. Res. J., 74, 797 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Knight, B.Sc. Dissertation, Art Conservation, Queen’s University, Kingston, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. I. Kim and S. M. Park, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 103, 893 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. W. M. Yuen, C. W. Kan, S. Q. Jiang, S. K. A. Ku, P. S. R. Choi, and K. Y. Wong, Fiber. Polym., 11, 229 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Park and K. Koo, Fiber. Polym., 15, 1701 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. W. C. Miles, “Textile Printing”, Society of Dyers and Colourists, Merrow Publishing Co. Ltd., London, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Ataeefard, Prog. Org. Coat., 77, 1376 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Ataeefard, Pigm. Resin Technol., 44, 232 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Ataeefard, Surface Eng., 30, 529 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Debeljak, D. Gregor-Svetec, R. Szentgyörgyvölgyi, and I. Znanstveni Clanak, Acta Graphica, 21, 17 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. A. Hubbe, J. J. Pawlak, and A. A. Koukoulas, Bio. Resources, 3, 627 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. S. Chen, Ms. C. Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Balasubramanian and E. Dalal, SPIE Proceedings, 3018, 110 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Pope, F. Hsu, and F. Sigg, “Color Gamut Quantified: A New Approach to Analyzing Color Gamut”, Rochester University of Technology, Rochester, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Farup, J. Y. Hardeberg, A. M. Bakke, S. Kopperud, and A. Rindal, “IS&T and SID’s 10th Color Imaging Conference: Color Science and Engineering: Systems”, pp.250–255, Technologies, Applications, Scottsdale, Arizona, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. M. Bakke, J. Y. Hardeberg, and I. Farup Gjovik, “Fourteenth Color Imaging Conference: Color Science and Engineering Systems”, p.141, Technologies, Applications, Scottsdale, Arizona, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Ataeefard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ataeefard, M. Electrophotographic printing of fabrics: Investigating the effect of fabrics on color reproduction. Fibers Polym 17, 1055–1061 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-5445-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-016-5445-8

Keywords

Navigation